An official website of the United States government
Abstract High alpine regions are threatened but understudied ecosystems that harbor diverse endemic species, making them an important biome for testing the role of environmental factors in driving functional trait‐mediated community assembly processes. We tested the hypothesis that plant community assembly along a climatic and elevation gradient is influenced by shifts in habitat suitability, which drive plant functional, phylogenetic, and spectral diversity. In a high mountain system (2400–3500 m) Región Metropolitana in the central Chilean Andes (33°S, 70°W). We surveyed vegetation and spectroscopic reflectance (400–2400 nm) to quantify taxonomic, phylogenetic, functional, and spectral diversity at five sites from 2400 to 3500 m elevation. We characterized soil attributes and processes by measuring water content, carbon and nitrogen, and net nitrogen mineralization rates. At high elevation, colder temperatures reduced available soil nitrogen, while at warmer, lower elevations, soil moisture was lower. Metrics of taxonomic, functional, and spectral alpha diversity peaked at mid‐elevations, while phylogenetic species richness was highest at low elevation. Leaf nitrogen increased with elevation at the community level and within individual species, consistent with global patterns of increasing leaf nitrogen with colder temperatures. The increase in leaf nitrogen, coupled with shifts in taxonomic and functional diversity associated with turnover in lineages, indicate that the ability to acquire and retain nitrogen in colder temperatures may be important in plant community assembly in this range. Such environmental filters have important implications for forecasting shifts in alpine plant communities under a warming climate.
more »
« less
Rare species do not disproportionately contribute to phylogenetic diversity in a subalpine plant community
Abstract PremiseWithin plant communities, few species are abundant, and most are locally rare. Worldwide, 36% of plant species are exceedingly rare and often face high extinction risk. However, the community phylogenetic impact of the loss of rare plants is largely unknown in many systems. We address this gap by investigating how rare species contribute to phylogenetic diversity, considering multiple metrics of rarity and multiple elevations in a subalpine plant community. MethodsWe collected abundance data at three sites near the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory (Colorado, USA). We calculated each species' range size from public occurrence data. We calculated phylogenetic signal for abundance and range size, compared community phylogenetic metrics weighted by range size and abundance to unweighted metrics, and quantified the change in phylogenetic diversity when removing single species and groups of species ranked by rarity. ResultsWe found phylogenetic signal for abundance, but not range size. There was no difference between rarity‐weighted and ‐unweighted phylogenetic diversity metrics. Finally, phylogenetic diversity did not decline more when we removed single rare species or groups of rare species than when we removed single common species and groups of common species. ConclusionsWe found that rare species, whether at low abundance or with a small range, do not disproportionately contribute to phylogenetic diversity in our subalpine plant community. These results were consistent across elevations. Instead, rare species might provide phylogenetic redundancy with common species. Deeper understanding of functional differentiation is needed to understand contributions of rare species to this system.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1750280
- PAR ID:
- 10663341
- Publisher / Repository:
- Botanical Society of America
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- American Journal of Botany
- Volume:
- 112
- Issue:
- 6
- ISSN:
- 0002-9122
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- e70061
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract PremiseEndophytic plant‐microbe interactions range from mutualistic relationships that confer important ecological and agricultural traits to neutral or quasi‐parasitic relationships. In contrast to root‐associated endophytes, the role of environmental and host‐related factors in the acquisition of leaf endophyte communities at broad spatial and phylogenetic scales remains sparsely studied. We assessed endofoliar diversity to test the hypothesis that membership in these microbial communities is driven primarily by abiotic environment and host phylogeny. MethodsWe used a broad geographic coverage of North America in the genusHeucheraL. (Saxifragaceae), representing 32 species and varieties across 161 populations. Bacterial and fungal communities were characterized using 16S and ITS amplicon sequencing, respectively, and standard diversity metrics were calculated. We assembled environmental predictors for microbial diversity at collection sites, including latitude, elevation, temperature, precipitation, and soil parameters. ResultsAssembly patterns differed between bacterial and fungal endophytes. Host phylogeny was significantly associated with bacteria, while geographic distance was the best predictor of fungal community composition. Species richness and phylogenetic diversity were consistent across sites and species, with only fungi showing a response to aridity and precipitation for some metrics. Unlike what has been observed with root‐associated microbial communities, in this system microbes show no relationship with pH or other soil factors. ConclusionsOverall, this work improves our understanding of the large‐scale patterns of diversity and community composition in leaf endophytes and highlights the relative significance of environmental and host‐related factors in driving different microbial communities within the leaf microbiome.more » « less
-
Abstract AimEcological and anthropogenic factors shift the abundances of dominant and rare tree species within local forest communities, thus affecting species composition and ecosystem functioning. To inform forest and conservation management it is important to understand the drivers of dominance and rarity in local tree communities. We answer the following research questions: (1) What are the patterns of dominance and rarity in tree communities? (2) Which ecological and anthropogenic factors predict these patterns? And (3) what is the extinction risk of locally dominant and rare tree species? LocationGlobal. Time period1990–2017. Major taxa studiedTrees. MethodsWe used 1.2 million forest plots and quantified local tree dominance as the relative plot basal area of the single most dominant species and local rarity as the percentage of species that contribute together to the least 10% of plot basal area. We mapped global community dominance and rarity using machine learning models and evaluated the ecological and anthropogenic predictors with linear models. Extinction risk, for example threatened status, of geographically widespread dominant and rare species was evaluated. ResultsCommunity dominance and rarity show contrasting latitudinal trends, with boreal forests having high levels of dominance and tropical forests having high levels of rarity. Increasing annual precipitation reduces community dominance, probably because precipitation is related to an increase in tree density and richness. Additionally, stand age is positively related to community dominance, due to stem diameter increase of the most dominant species. Surprisingly, we find that locally dominant and rare species, which are geographically widespread in our data, have an equally high rate of elevated extinction due to declining populations through large‐scale land degradation. Main conclusionsBy linking patterns and predictors of community dominance and rarity to extinction risk, our results suggest that also widespread species should be considered in large‐scale management and conservation practices.more » « less
-
Species differ dramatically in their prevalence in the natural world, with many species characterized as rare due to restricted geographic distribution, low local abundance and/or habitat specialization. We investigated the ecoevolutionary causes and consequences of rarity with phylogenetically controlled metaanalyses of population genetic diversity, fitness and functional traits in rare and common congeneric plant species. Our syntheses included 252 rare species and 267 common congeners reported in 153 peer-reviewed articles published from 1978 to 2020 and one manuscript in press. Rare species have reduced population genetic diversity, depressed fitness and smaller reproductive structures than common congeners. Rare species also could suffer from inbreeding depression and reduced fertilization efficiency. By limiting their capacity to adapt and migrate, these characteristics could influence contemporary patterns of rarity and increase the susceptibility of rare species to rapid environmental change. We recommend that future studies present more nuanced data on the extent of rarity in focal species, expose rare and common species to ecologically relevant treatments, including reciprocal transplants, and conduct quantitative genetic and population genomic analyses across a greater array of systems. This research could elucidate the processes that contribute to rarity and generate robust predictions of extinction risks under global change.more » « less
-
Abstract Plants of the same species harbor shared enemies that can limit population growth and promote plant species coexistence, a phenomenon known as conspecific negative density dependence (CNDD). Host‐specific microbial pathogens are known drivers of CNDD, yet how these plant–microbe interactions vary with environmental context is less explored. Further, microbial pathogens and mutualists may jointly contribute to the relative strength of CNDD, yet most studies focus only on pathogens. We used ITS metabarcoding to characterize soil and foliar fungal functional groups for individual trees of three dominant conifers in forests where the strength of CNDD has been shown to be greater at lower elevations relative to higher elevations. We hypothesized that trees within mesic low elevation forests accumulate more host‐specific fungal pathogens compared to trees found in the more xeric high elevation forests. Conversely, we hypothesized that trees found in the high elevation forests accumulate more host‐specific mutualists compared to those found at low elevations. We tested these hypotheses with the fungal community sequencing data by evaluating three independent metrics of plant‐associated fungal functional groups—alpha diversity, community weighted mean (CWM), and host specificity—that together address the degree to which each functional group is associated with each focal tree. We found soil pathogen alpha diversity, CWM, and host specificity to all decline in climates associated with increasing elevation. We also found foliar fungal pathogen host specificity, but not diversity or CWM, to decline in climates associated with increasing elevation. In contrast, we found no significant relationships between any of our three metrics for ectomycorrhizal fungi and climate. Our results suggest that across a gradient known to negatively covary with CNDD strength, pathogen accumulation is most prevalent in the mesic, lower elevation climates. These results are consistent with pathogenic fungi contributing to observed landscape level variation in CNDD.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.70061
