More Like this

1. Decadal increases in carbon uptake offset by respiratory losses across northern permafrost ecosystems

   See, C (August 2024, Nature Climate Change)

   Tundra and boreal ecosystems encompass the northern circumpolar permafrost region and are experiencing rapid environmental change with important implications for the global carbon (C) budget. We analysed multi-decadal time series containing 302 annual estimates of carbon dioxide (CO2) flux across 70 permafrost and non permafrost ecosystems, and 672 estimates of summer CO2 flux across 181 ecosystems. We find an increase in the annual CO2 sink across non-permafrost ecosystems but not permafrost ecosystems, despite similar increases in summer uptake. Thus, recent non-growing-season CO2 losses have substantially impacted the CO2 balance of permafrost ecosystems. Furthermore, analysis of interannual variability reveals warmer summers amplify the C cycle (increase productivity and respiration) at putatively nitrogen-limited sites and at sites less reliant on summer precipitation for water use. Our findings suggest that water and nutrient availability will be important predictors of the C-cycle response of these ecosystems to future warming. 

   more » « less
2. Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF): Towards a Better Understanding of Vegetation Dynamics and Carbon Uptake in Arctic-Boreal Ecosystems

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-024-00194-8  

   Cheng, Rui (June 2024, Current Climate Change Reports)

   Abstract Purpose of ReviewTerrestrial ecosystems in the Arctic-Boreal region play a crucial role in the global carbon cycle as a carbon sink. However, rapid warming in this region induces uncertainties regarding the future net carbon exchange between land and the atmosphere, highlighting the need for better monitoring of the carbon fluxes. Solar-Induced chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF), a good proxy for vegetation CO$$^{2}$$ ${}^2$uptake, has been broadly utilized to assess vegetation dynamics and carbon uptake at the global scale. However, the full potential and limitations of SIF in the Arctic-Boreal region have not been explored. Therefore, this review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the latest insights into Arctic-Boreal carbon uptake through SIF analyses, underscoring the advances and challenges of SIF in solving emergent unknowns in this region. Additionally, this review proposes applications of SIF across scales in support of other observational and modeling platforms for better understanding Arctic-Boreal vegetation dynamics and carbon fluxes. Recent FindingsCross-scale SIF measurements complement each other, offering valuable perspectives on Arctic-Boreal ecosystems, such as vegetation phenology, carbon uptake, carbon-water coupling, and ecosystem responses to disturbances. By incorporating SIF into land surface modeling, the understanding of Arctic-Boreal changes and their climate drivers can be mechanistically enhanced, providing critical insights into the changes of Arctic-Boreal ecosystems under global warming. SummaryWhile SIF measurements are more abundant and with finer spatiotemporal resolutions, it is important to note that the coverage of these measurements is still limited and uneven in the Arctic-Boreal region. To address this limitation and further advance our understanding of the Arctic-Boreal carbon cycle, this review advocates for fostering a SIF network providing long-term and continuous measurements across spatial scales. Simultaneously measuring SIF and other environmental variables in the context of a multi-modal sensing system can help us comprehensively characterize Arctic-Boreal ecosystems with spatial details in land surface models, ultimately contributing to more robust climate projections. 

   more » « less
3. Evaluation of carbonyl sulfide biosphere exchange in the Simple Biosphere Model (SiB4)

   https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-6547-2021  

   Kooijmans, Linda M.; Cho, Ara; Ma, Jin; Kaushik, Aleya; Haynes, Katherine D.; Baker, Ian; Luijkx, Ingrid T.; Groenink, Mathijs; Peters, Wouter; Miller, John B.; et al (January 2021, Biogeosciences)

   Abstract. The uptake of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by terrestrial plants is linked tophotosynthetic uptake of CO2 as these gases partly share the sameuptake pathway. Applying COS as a photosynthesis tracer in models requires anaccurate representation of biosphere COS fluxes, but these models have notbeen extensively evaluated against field observations of COS fluxes. In thispaper, the COS flux as simulated by the Simple Biosphere Model, version 4(SiB4), is updated with the latest mechanistic insights and evaluated with siteobservations from different biomes: one evergreen needleleaf forest, twodeciduous broadleaf forests, three grasslands, and two crop fields spread overEurope and North America. We improved SiB4 in several ways to improve itsrepresentation of COS. To account for the effect of atmospheric COS molefractions on COS biosphere uptake, we replaced the fixed atmospheric COS molefraction boundary condition originally used in SiB4 with spatially andtemporally varying COS mole fraction fields. Seasonal amplitudes of COS molefractions are ∼50–200 ppt at the investigated sites with aminimum mole fraction in the late growing season. Incorporating seasonalvariability into the model reduces COS uptake rates in the late growingseason, allowing better agreement with observations. We also replaced theempirical soil COS uptake model in SiB4 with a mechanistic model thatrepresents both uptake and production of COS in soils, which improves thematch with observations over agricultural fields and fertilized grasslandsoils. The improved version of SiB4 was capable of simulating the diurnal andseasonal variation in COS fluxes in the boreal, temperate, and Mediterraneanregion. Nonetheless, the daytime vegetation COS flux is underestimated onaverage by 8±27 %, albeit with large variability across sites. On aglobal scale, our model modifications decreased the modeled COS terrestrialbiosphere sink from 922 Gg S yr−1 in the original SiB4 to753 Gg S yr−1 in the updated version. The largest decrease influxes was driven by lower atmospheric COS mole fractions over regions withhigh productivity, which highlights the importance of accounting forvariations in atmospheric COS mole fractions. The change to a different soilmodel, on the other hand, had a relatively small effect on the globalbiosphere COS sink. The secondary role of the modeled soil component in theglobal COS budget supports the use of COS as a global photosynthesis tracer. Amore accurate representation of COS uptake in SiB4 should allow for improvedapplication of atmospheric COS as a tracer of local- to global-scaleterrestrial photosynthesis. 

   more » « less
4. Decadal increases in carbon uptake offset by respiratory losses across northern permafrost ecosystems

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02057-4  

   See, Craig R; Virkkala, Anna-Maria; Natali, Susan M; Rogers, Brendan M; Mauritz, Marguerite; Biasi, Christina; Bokhorst, Stef; Boike, Julia; Bret-Harte, M Syndonia; Celis, Gerardo; et al (August 2024, Nature Climate Change)

   Abstract Tundra and boreal ecosystems encompass the northern circumpolar permafrost region and are experiencing rapid environmental change with important implications for the global carbon (C) budget. We analysed multi-decadal time series containing 302 annual estimates of carbon dioxide (CO₂) flux across 70 permafrost and non-permafrost ecosystems, and 672 estimates of summer CO₂flux across 181 ecosystems. We find an increase in the annual CO₂sink across non-permafrost ecosystems but not permafrost ecosystems, despite similar increases in summer uptake. Thus, recent non-growing-season CO₂losses have substantially impacted the CO₂balance of permafrost ecosystems. Furthermore, analysis of interannual variability reveals warmer summers amplify the C cycle (increase productivity and respiration) at putatively nitrogen-limited sites and at sites less reliant on summer precipitation for water use. Our findings suggest that water and nutrient availability will be important predictors of the C-cycle response of these ecosystems to future warming. 

   more » « less
5. Permafrost Carbon: Progress on Understanding Stocks and Fluxes Across Northern Terrestrial Ecosystems

   https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JG007638  

   Treat, Claire C; Virkkala, Anna‐Maria; Burke, Eleanor; Bruhwiler, Lori; Chatterjee, Abhishek; Fisher, Joshua B; Hashemi, Josh; Parmentier, Frans‐Jan W; Rogers, Brendan M; Westermann, Sebastian; et al (March 2024, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences)

   Abstract Significant progress in permafrost carbon science made over the past decades include the identification of vast permafrost carbon stocks, the development of new pan‐Arctic permafrost maps, an increase in terrestrial measurement sites for CO₂and methane fluxes, and important factors affecting carbon cycling, including vegetation changes, periods of soil freezing and thawing, wildfire, and other disturbance events. Process‐based modeling studies now include key elements of permafrost carbon cycling and advances in statistical modeling and inverse modeling enhance understanding of permafrost region C budgets. By combining existing data syntheses and model outputs, the permafrost region is likely a wetland methane source and small terrestrial ecosystem CO₂sink with lower net CO₂uptake toward higher latitudes, excluding wildfire emissions. For 2002–2014, the strongest CO₂sink was located in western Canada (median: −52 g C m⁻² y⁻¹) and smallest sinks in Alaska, Canadian tundra, and Siberian tundra (medians: −5 to −9 g C m⁻² y⁻¹). Eurasian regions had the largest median wetland methane fluxes (16–18 g CH₄m⁻² y⁻¹). Quantifying the regional scale carbon balance remains challenging because of high spatial and temporal variability and relatively low density of observations. More accurate permafrost region carbon fluxes require: (a) the development of better maps characterizing wetlands and dynamics of vegetation and disturbances, including abrupt permafrost thaw; (b) the establishment of new year‐round CO₂and methane flux sites in underrepresented areas; and (c) improved models that better represent important permafrost carbon cycle dynamics, including non‐growing season emissions and disturbance effects. 

   more » « less