An official website of the United States government
Abstract Efforts to catalog global biodiversity have often focused on aboveground taxonomic diversity, with limited consideration of belowground communities. However, diversity aboveground may influence the diversity of belowground communities and vice versa. In addition to taxonomic diversity, the structural diversity of plant communities may be related to the diversity of soil bacterial and fungal communities, which drive important ecosystem processes but are difficult to characterize across broad spatial scales. In forests, canopy structural diversity may influence soil microorganisms through its effects on ecosystem productivity and root architecture, and via associations between canopy structure, stand age, and species richness. Given that structural diversity is one of the few types of diversity that can be readily measured remotely (e.g., using light detection and ranging—LiDAR), establishing links between structural and microbial diversity could facilitate the detection of belowground biodiversity hotspots. We investigated the potential for using remotely sensed information about forest structural diversity as a predictor of soil microbial community richness and composition. We calculated LiDAR‐derived metrics of structural diversity as well as a suite of stand and soil properties from 38 forested plots across the central hardwoods region of Indiana, USA, to test whether forest canopy structure is linked with the community richness and diversity of four key soil microbial groups: bacteria, fungi, arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, and ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungi. We found that the density of canopy vegetation is positively associated with the taxonomic richness (alpha diversity) of EM fungi, independent of changes in plant taxonomic richness. Further, structural diversity metrics were significantly correlated with the overall community composition of bacteria, EM, and total fungal communities. However, soil properties were the strongest predictors of variation in the taxonomic richness and community composition of microbial communities in comparison with structural diversity and tree species diversity. As remote sensing tools and algorithms are rapidly advancing, these results may have important implications for the use of remote sensing of vegetation structural diversity for management and restoration practices aimed at preserving belowground biodiversity.
more »
« less
Why, when, and how microbes can benefit ecological restorations: current approaches and future directions
Summary The restoration of terrestrial ecosystems often requires the reestablishment of plant communities, but restorations often overlook microbial communities, which directly and indirectly structure plant diversity. Legacies of anthropogenic disturbance radically alter microbial diversity and, contrary to previous assumptions, the natural recovery of microbial communities is not guaranteed, even after decades. This necessitates established and novel forms of microbial restoration, such as the addition of key microbial taxa to boost plant diversity and ecosystem functioning. Here, we review why anthropogenically disturbed microbial communities need restoration, the positive outcomes of doing so for plant conservation, community dynamics, and ecosystem functioning, and best practices when taking these approaches. We also highlight knowledge gaps in this emerging field, such as the mechanisms underlying successful microbially based restoration of plant communities, how shifting climate conditions will impact global microbiomes, and the potential for off‐target effects. Our goal is to shift the perspective of microbes as passive measures of restoration success to the restoration of microbial communities as a major objective and driver of restoration outcomes.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1754287
- PAR ID:
- 10669019
- Publisher / Repository:
- New Phytologist Foundation
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- New Phytologist
- ISSN:
- 0028-646X
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
A primary goal of ecological restoration is to increase biodiversity in degraded ecosystems. However, the success of restoration ecology is often assessed by measuring the response of a single functional group or trophic level to restoration, without considering how restoration affects multitrophic interactions that shape biodiversity. An ecosystem-wide approach to restoration is therefore necessary to understand whether animal responses to restoration, such as changes in biodiversity, are facilitated by changes in plant communities (plant-driven effects) or disturbance and succession resulting from restoration activities (management-driven effects). Furthermore, most restoration ecology studies focus on how restoration alters taxonomic diversity, while less attention is paid to the response of functional and phylogenetic diversity in restored ecosystems. Here, we compared the strength of plant-driven and management-driven effects of restoration on four animal communities (ground beetles, dung beetles, snakes, and small mammals) in a chronosequence of restored tallgrass prairie, where sites varied in management history (prescribed fire and bison reintroduction). Our analyses indicate that management-driven effects on animal communities were six-times stronger than effects mediated through changes in plant biodiversity. Additionally, we demonstrate that restoration can simultaneously have positive and negative effects on biodiversity through different pathways, which may help reconcile variation in restoration outcomes. Furthermore, animal taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity responded differently to restoration, suggesting that restoration plans might benefit from considering multiple dimensions of animal biodiversity. We conclude that metrics of plant diversity alone may not be adequate to assess the success of restoration in reassembling functional ecosystems.more » « less
-
Abstract Soil extracellular enzymes are produced and excreted by soil microbial organisms. They catalyze many of the biochemical reactions that support crucial ecosystem functions like decomposition, organic matter mineralization, nutrient cycling, and C sequestration. Microbial communities that produce these enzymes are shaped in part by plant diversity and composition, but the relationships between plant communities and enzyme activities are not well resolved. Diverse plant communities may provide a diversity of soil organic matter inputs that support high microbial diversity and function. This would predict positive relationships between enzyme activities and plant diversity, particularly plant functional trait diversity that more closely reflects the diversity of soil inputs. Alternatively, dominant plant functional groups may shape microbial communities and activities, such as legumes that add N‐rich resources to soil. These impacts might be seen in microbes by the relative acquisition of different resources, such as the activity ratio of C‐acquiring β‐glucosidase and N‐acquiring N‐acetyl‐β‐D‐glucosaminidase. We use soil enzyme and plant community data from four separate grassland studies—two experiments and two observational community studies—to ask how plant diversity and functional composition affect enzyme activities. There were relationships between enzyme activities and plants for the observational community studies, but not the experimental studies, so plant–soil enzyme relationships may take time to emerge. At one community site, activities for four hydrolytic enzymes declined with plant Shannon diversity, and β‐glucosidase activity increased with greater functional trait diversity. The ratio of C‐acquiring β‐glucosidase and N‐acquiring N‐acetyl‐β‐D‐glucosaminidase activities increased with plant diversity and cover of nitrogen‐fixers, or declined with graminoid cover, suggesting that microbes reduced their relative allocation of resources to N acquisition when plant inputs made N more accessible. If lower activities of enzymes targeting C‐rich compounds are indicators of higher potential for C sequestration, then grassland plant communities with high taxonomic diversity may promote C storage. This could provide strong justification for management and restoration strategies that sustain high plant biodiversity. However, the inconsistent results, with enzyme activity unrelated to plants in both experimental studies, imply that other environmental factors correlated with plant composition may be stronger determinants of soil enzymes in some grassland settings.more » « less
-
Abstract While the positive relationship between plant diversity and ecosystem functioning is frequently observed and often attributed to direct plant–plant interactions, it remains unclear whether and how the effects of plant diversity endure through soil legacy effects, particularly at the level of genotypic diversity. We manipulated the genotypic diversity ofScirpus mariqueterand tested its soil legacy effects on a conspecific phytometer under low‐ and high‐water availability conditions. We found that genotypic diversity enhanced phytometer productivity through soil legacies, with stronger effects under low‐water availability conditions, improving its resistance to water stress. Moreover, this effect was attributed to the association between asexual and sexual reproductive strategies by increasing ramet number to ensure plant survival under low‐water availability and promoting sexual reproduction to escape stress. The observed diversity effects were primarily associated with increased levels of microbial biomass in soils trained by populations with diverse genotypes. Our findings highlight the importance of plant genotypic diversity in modulating ecosystem functioning through soil legacies and call for management measures that promote genetic diversity to make ecosystems sustainable in the face of climate change.more » « less
-
Abstract Restoring ecosystems requires the re-establishment of diverse soil microbial communities that drive critical ecosystem functions. In grasslands, restoration and management require the application of disturbances like fire and grazing. Disturbances can shape microbial taxonomic composition and potentially functional composition as well. We characterized taxonomic and functional gene composition of soil communities using whole genome shotgun metagenomic sequencing to determine how restored soil communities differed from pre-restoration agricultural soils and original remnant soils, how management affects soil microbes, and whether restoration and management affect the number of microbial genes associated with carbohydrate degradation. We found distinct differences in both taxonomic and functional diversity and composition among restored, remnant, and agricultural soils. Remnant soils had low taxonomic and functional richness and diversity, as well as distinct composition, indicating that restoration of agricultural soils does not re-create soil microbial communities that match remnants. Prescribed fire management increased functional diversity, which also was higher in more recently planted restorations. Finally, restored and post-fire soils included high abundances of genes encoding cellulose-degrading enzymes, so restorations and their ongoing management can potentially support functions important in carbon cycling.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70995
