An official website of the United States government
ABSTRACT Scale‐Dependency of Native StatusClassifying populations as native or nonnative requires well‐defined range boundaries for species. While many studies define native status according to large biogeographic realms, natural dispersal barriers often limit species distributions at regional or smaller spatial extents. As such, native/nonnative definitions are inherently scale‐dependent and estimates of community invadedness thus depend on the spatial resolution at which native status is defined. For example, nonnative species can be introduced among realms, among regions within realms, and among ecological provinces within regions (hereafter, simply “provinces”). By explicitly considering the scale‐dependency of native/nonnative status definitions, we can more effectively compare results across studies, more comprehensively evaluate the degree of invasion levels, and more objectively communicate the native status of a species. Location30,034 stream segments, conterminous United States. Time Period2000–2023. Major Taxa StudiedFreshwater fishes. Quantifying Fish Community Invadedness Across<styled-content style='fixed-case'>US</styled-content>StreamsWe illustrate the importance of scale‐dependent native status definitions by quantifying nonnative species richness and relative abundance in stream fish communities across the United States, finding that provincially nonnative species are nearly four times as prevalent as extra‐realm nonnative species, and represented approximately 10% of all individuals in average community surveys. ImplicationsUnrealistically broad native status definitions underestimate community invadedness. Dismissing regionally and provincially nonnative species can have severe ecological consequences, including displacement and hybridisation with native species and the loss of unique communities through biotic homogenisation. These consequences may undermine efforts to maintain and protect distinct local biodiversity and conserve endemic species.
more »
« less
Cross‐scale interactions mediate local drivers of nonnative species richness
Many well‐supported hypotheses seek to explain drivers of nonnative species richness across spatial scales, but evidence for common patterns among regions and taxa remains inconclusive. This study investigates why consistent patterns are elusive by estimating and assessing cross‐scale interactions, wherein large‐scale factors contextualize patterns measured at smaller scales. We investigated whether local relationships of disturbance and native species richness with nonnative species richness are moderated by regional native gamma diversity. Regions with higher gamma diversity, we hypothesized, would be unfavorable to nonnative species due to high levels of competition and reduced niche availability, thus mediating local effects of native richness and disturbance on nonnative species richness. Using a fine resolution stream fish community dataset covering 159 regional watersheds in the conterminous United States during 2000–2023, we quantified cross‐scale interactions using a two‐level Bayesian hierarchical model. In the first level, we estimated the effects of disturbance and native richness on nonnative richness in local stream segments indexed by region. In the second level, we used this regional index to estimate cross‐scale interactions of native gamma diversity (regional‐level richness) on the first‐level relationships. Local nonnative richness was generally positively associated with native richness and disturbance. However, these relationships were reduced in regions with more diverse native stream fish assemblages. Thus, native gamma diversity provided an important mechanistic context for local nonnative richness relationships across regional watersheds through a negative cross‐scale interaction. As large spatial datasets become increasingly available, accounting for cross‐scale interactions in inter‐regional observational studies will be critical for understanding ecological relationships and may provide a predictive framework for studies with conflicting support for differing conceptual models.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10673394
- Publisher / Repository:
- Ecography
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Ecography
- ISSN:
- 0906-7590
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
ABSTRACT AimEmpirical tests of conceptual hypotheses describing species invasions often differ depending on the spatial scale (spatial resolution and extent of study area) at which they were conducted. Some of this disparity may arise from tradeoffs in data quality necessitating the use of different indices of community invadedness among scales. Local‐scale studies typically use fine‐resolution, descriptive measures of community invadedness (‘dominance’, the proportion nonnative individuals) at limited spatial extents, while macroscale studies often aggregate datasets to cover large spatial extents but use coarser spatial resolution and less descriptive indices (nonnative species richness). We investigated the consequences of using different indices to represent community invadedness at different spatial scales, and explored the implications for hypothesis testing when nonnative richness and dominance are not related. Location23,793 stream segments within 17 regional watersheds, conterminous United States. Time Period2000–2023. Major Taxa StudiedFreshwater fishes. MethodsUsing a large‐extent, fine‐resolution dataset, we evaluated the correlation between nonnative species richness and dominance in communities, and compared empirical support for prominent invasion hypotheses (biotic resistance, disturbance facilitation) in identical Bayesian hierarchical models with community invadedness represented by each metric. ResultsNonnative richness and dominance were weakly correlated, allowing us to classify communities into four archetypes based on relationships between the two indices. Empirical support for both invasion hypotheses differed between the two indices of community invadedness both overall and within regional watersheds. Main ConclusionsNonnative species richness and dominance describe different facets of the invasion process and may under‐ or over‐represent community invadedness when considered alone. Empirical disparity between models estimating the two metrics may be an important source of scale‐dependent inference in invasion ecology. When assembling datasets for macroscale studies, retaining fine spatial resolution as much as possible will allow researchers opportunities to use more descriptive and potentially complementary indices of community invadedness.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Stream and lake fishes are important economic and recreational resources that respond to alterations in their surrounding watersheds and serve as indicators of ecological stressors on aquatic ecosystems. Research suggests that fish species diversity is largely influenced by surface water connectivity, or the lack thereof; however, few studies consider freshwater connections and their effect on both lake and stream fish communities across broad spatial extents. We used fish data from 559 lakes and 854 streams from the midwestern–northeastern United States to examine the role of surface water connectivity on fish species richness and community composition. We found that although lakes and streams share many species, connectivity had a positive effect on species richness across lakes and streams and helped explain species composition. Taking an integrated approach that includes both lake and stream fish communities and connectivity among freshwaters helps inform scientific understanding of what drives variation in fish species diversity at broad spatial scales and can help managers who are faced with planning for state-, regional-, or national-scale monitoring and restoration.more » « less
-
Biological invasions are profoundly altering Earth’s ecosystems, but generalities about the effects of nonnative species on the diversity and productivity of native communities have been elusive. This lack of generality may reflect the limited spatial and temporal extents of most previous studies. Using >5 million tree measurements across eastern US forests from 1995 to 2023, we quantified temporal trends in tree diversity and biomass. We then analyzed community-level changes in native tree diversity and biomass in relation to nonnative tree invasion and native species colonization. Across the entire eastern United States, native tree species richness decreased over time in plots where nonnatives occurred, whereas nonnative species richness and the biomass of both natives and nonnatives increased over time. At the community scale, native richness tended to decline following nonnative invasion, whereas native biomass and richness-independent measures of trait and phylogenetic diversity tended to remain stable. These patterns can be explained by the rarity of the displaced native species and their functional and phylogenetic similarity to native species that survived nonnative invasions. In contrast, native survivors tended to be functionally distinct from nonnative invaders, suggesting an important role for niche partitioning in community dynamics. Colonization by previously absent native species was associated with an increase in native richness (beyond the addition of native colonizers), which contrasts with declines in native richness that tended to follow nonnative invasion. These results suggest a causal role for nonnative species in the native richness decline of invaded communities.more » « less
-
Summary Though substantial effort has gone into predicting how global climate change will impact biodiversity patterns, the scarcity of taxon‐specific information has hampered the efficacy of these endeavors. Further, most studies analyzing spatiotemporal patterns of biodiversity focus narrowly on species richness. We apply machine learning approaches to a comprehensive vascular plant database for the United States and generate predictive models of regional plant taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity in response to a wide range of environmental variables. We demonstrate differences in predicted patterns and potential drivers of native vs nonnative biodiversity. In particular, native phylogenetic diversity is likely to decrease over the next half century despite increases in species richness. We also identify that patterns of taxonomic diversity can be incongruent with those of phylogenetic diversity. The combination of macro‐environmental factors that determine diversity likely varies at continental scales; thus, as climate change alters the combinations of these factors across the landscape, the collective effect on regional diversity will also vary. Our study represents one of the most comprehensive examinations of plant diversity patterns to date and demonstrates that our ability to predict future diversity may benefit tremendously from the application of machine learning.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.08379
