An official website of the United States government
Abstract Tree diversity may play a role in buffering forest ecosystems against climate extremes. We asked how diverse tree communities could (1) influence local atmospheric water demand, and (2) how changes in microclimate could be linked to the productivity of trees within forest communities.To assess forest canopy characteristics and calculate above‐ground productivity, we measured plant fractional cover using UAV‐LiDAR and conducted growth inventories in 148 forest plots of a young temperate tree diversity experiment. We monitored the microclimate and tracked soil moisture in a subset of forest plots to understand the relative influence of above‐ground and below‐ground water status on tree growth. Gas exchange, spectral reflectance and leaf mass per area were measured on four tree species distributed throughout the experiment to assess the influence of microclimate on tree physiology.We found that fast‐growing, early successional tree species increased forest cover, which was linked to buffered daily amplitudes of vapour pressure deficits (VPD) within forest plots and increases in the annual wood production of slower‐growing, shade‐tolerant tree species. In assemblages with more buffered microclimates, several slower‐growing tree species showed increased leaf water content and reduced physiological stress. Plots with reduced amplitude in VPD exhibited greater complementarity and productivity relative to those with higher variability.Synthesis. Our findings show that tree diversity and the proportion of fast‐growing, early successional tree species can increase canopy cover and buffer the microclimates of young forests, benefiting the physiology and productivity of slower‐growing, shade tolerant tree species. We reason that a self‐reinforcing dynamic of tree growth and microclimate buffering is likely at play. In the context of a rapidly changing climate, our findings suggest that diverse forest communities can shape local microenvironments to support sustainable ecosystem functioning.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on March 5, 2027
Diversity affects microclimate temperature and humidity: an overview of the evidence and major unanswered questions
Summary Climate change is increasing global temperatures, increasing atmospheric drying, and driving more severe and frequent drought. Plants can cool and humidify microclimates through sensible and latent heat exchange. Higher diversity plant communities can modify microclimates more strongly than lower diversity plant communities, creating the potential for strong biodiversity–climate feedbacks. Here, we review the physical and physiological mechanisms that drive these diversity‐microclimate patterns, catalogue the magnitude of these trends across ecosystem types, and explore how microclimate feedbacks can explain the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. We identify key areas where more research is needed (e.g. the role of belowground traits that drive latent heat exchange). This research is essential for understanding how biodiversity and climate are linked at micro‐ and macroscales.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10674775
- Publisher / Repository:
- New Phytologist Foundation
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- New Phytologist
- ISSN:
- 0028-646X
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Most biodiversity dynamics and ecosystem processes on land take place in microclimates that are decoupled from the climate as measured by standardised weather stations in open, unshaded locations. As a result, microclimate monitoring is increasingly being integrated in many studies in ecology and evolution.Overviews of the protocols and measurement methods related to microclimate are needed, especially for those starting in the field and to achieve more generality and standardisation in microclimate studies.Here, we present 10 practical guidelines for ground‐based research of terrestrial microclimates, covering methods and best practices from initial conceptualisation of the study to data analyses.Our guidelines encompass the significance of microclimates; the specifics of what, where, when and how to measure them; the design of microclimate studies; and the optimal approaches for analysing and sharing data for future use and collaborations. The paper is structured as a chronological guide, leading the reader through each step necessary to conduct a comprehensive microclimate study. At the end, we also discuss further research avenues and development in this field.With these 10 guidelines for microclimate monitoring, we hope to stimulate and advance microclimate research in ecology and evolution, especially under the pressing need to account for buffering or amplifying abilities of contrasting microhabitats in the context of global climate change.more » « less
-
Abstract Biodiversity generally enhances ecosystem productivity, but whether such effects persist or intensify during climate extremes is unclear. Here we synthesized data from 75 biodiversity experiments across grasslands and forests to assess how aridity and soil nutrients modulate plant diversity effects under drought and heat extremes. Biodiversity most strongly enhanced productivity under extreme drought in more arid grasslands but had limited effects in forests under such conditions. More arid grasslands showed enhanced complementarity effects under extreme drought, whereas less arid grasslands favoured selection effects driven by productive species. Heat extremes did not produce comparable context-dependent changes in plant diversity effects across ecosystem types or aridity gradients. Soil nutrients did not have any detectable influence under either drought or heat extremes, suggesting that as climatic stress intensifies, hydric limitations override edaphic constraints. Our synthesis identifies when and where plant diversity most strongly enhances productivity, showing that its effects are the greatest under extreme drought in more arid grasslands.more » « less
-
Abstract As climate change advances, there is a need to examine climate conditions at scales that are ecologically relevant to species. While microclimates in forested systems have been extensively studied, microclimates in grasslands have received little attention despite the climate vulnerability of this endangered biome. We employed a novel combination of iButton temperature and humidity measurements, fine-scale spatial observations of vegetation and topography collected by unpiloted aircraft system, and gridded mesoclimate products to model microclimate anomalies in temperate grasslands. We found that grasslands harbored diverse microclimates and that primary productivity (as represented by normalized difference vegetation index), canopy height, and topography were strong spatial drivers of these anomalies. Microclimate heterogeneity is likely of ecological importance to grassland organisms seeking out climate change refugia, and thus there is a need to consider microclimate complexity in the management and conservation of grassland biodiversity.more » « less
-
IntroductionClimate change and plant biodiversity loss have large impacts on terrestrial ecosystem function, with the soil microbiome being primary mediators of these effects. The soil microbiome is a complex system, consisting of multiple functional groups with contrasting life histories. Most studies of climate forces and plant biodiversity effects on microbiome consider the perturbations and the microbial functional groups in isolation preventing us from understanding the full picture of the relative and differential impacts of perturbations on microbial functional groups. MethodsWe measured changes in multiple microbial communities with different functionality, including plant mutualists and pathogens, after three growing seasons in a full-factorial experiment manipulating precipitation (50%, 150% of ambient), plant diversity, and plant composition. Using amplicon sequencing to characterize the response of fungi, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, bacteria and oomycetes, and we found that composition of all microbial groups differentiated strongly between precipitation treatments. ResultsOomycete and bacterial diversity increased with 150% precipitation, while AM and saprotroph fungal diversity decreased. Microbial differentiation in response to plant family and plant species composition was stronger after the third growing season than observed after year one. However, microbial response to plant species richness was weaker in year three. Microbiome response to plant composition was largely independent of the response to precipitation, except for oomycetes, which had greater response to plant composition in high precipitation. DiscussionThese findings build upon prior findings that these microbial community members differentially respond to plant community compositional treatments, by measuring the response over 3 years and with the addition of precipitation treatments. We find that both changes in climate and plant composition can drive major differences in soil microbiome composition, which can feed back on plant community structure and alter ecosystem function.more » « less
