More Like this

1. Better Private Distribution Testing by Leveraging Unverified Auxiliary Data

   Aliakbarpour, Maryam; Burudgunte, Arnav; Canonne, Clement; Rubinfeld, Ronitt (June 2025, 38th Annual Conference on Learning Theory (COLT 2025))

   We extend the framework of augmented distribution testing (Aliakbarpour, Indyk, Rubinfeld, and Silwal, NeurIPS 2024) to the differentially private setting. This captures scenarios where a data ana- lyst must perform hypothesis testing tasks on sensitive data, but is able to leverage prior knowledge (public, but possibly erroneous or untrusted) about the data distribution. We design private algorithms in this augmented setting for three flagship distribution testing tasks, uniformity, identity, and closeness testing, whose sample complexity smoothly scales with the claimed quality of the auxiliary information. We complement our algorithms with information- theoretic lower bounds, showing that their sample complexity is optimal (up to logarithmic factors). Keywords: distribution testing, identity testing, closeness testing, differential privacy, learning- augmented algorithms 

   more » « less
2. Better Private Distribution Testing by Leveraging Unverified Auxiliary Data

   Aliakbarpour, Maryam; Burudgunte, Arnav; Canonne, Clement; Rubinfeld, Ronitt (June 2025, Theory and Practice of Differential Privacy (TPDP 2025))

   We extend the framework of augmented distribution testing (Aliakbarpour, Indyk, Rubinfeld, and Silwal, NeurIPS 2024) to the differentially private setting. This captures scenarios where a data analyst must perform hypothesis testing tasks on sensitive data, but is able to leverage prior knowledge (public, but possibly erroneous or untrusted) about the data distribution. We design private algorithms in this augmented setting for three flagship distribution testing tasks, uniformity, identity, and closeness testing, whose sample complexity smoothly scales with the claimed quality of the auxiliary information. We complement our algorithms with information-theoretic lower bounds, showing that their sample complexity is optimal (up to logarithmic factors). 

   more » « less
3. Better Private Distribution Testing by Leveraging Unverified Auxiliary Data,

   Aliakbarpour, Maryam; Burudgunte, Arnav; Canonne, Clement; Rubinfeld, Ronitt (June 2025, Theory and Practive of Differential Privacy (TPDP 2025))

   We extend the framework of augmented distribution testing (Aliakbarpour, Indyk, Rubinfeld, and Silwal, NeurIPS 2024) to the differentially private setting. This captures scenarios where a data analyst must perform hypothesis testing tasks on sensitive data, but is able to leverage prior knowledge (public, but possibly erroneous or untrusted) about the data distribution. We design private algorithms in this augmented setting for three flagship distribution testing tasks, uniformity, identity, and closeness testing, whose sample complexity smoothly scales with the claimed quality of the auxiliary information. We complement our algorithms with information-theoretic lower bounds, showing that their sample complexity is optimal (up to logarithmic factors). 

   more » « less
4. Private High-Dimensional Hypothesis Testing

   Narayanan, S. (January 2022, Conference on Learning Theory (COLT 2022))

   We provide improved differentially private algorithms for identity testing of high-dimensional distributions. Specifically, for d-dimensional Gaussian distributions with known covariance Σ, we can test whether the distribution comes from N(μ∗,Σ) for some fixed μ∗ or from some N(μ,Σ) with total variation distance at least α from N(μ∗,Σ) with (ε,0)-differential privacy, using only O~(d1/2α2+d1/3α4/3⋅ε2/3+1α⋅ε) samples if the algorithm is allowed to be computationally inefficient, and only O~(d1/2α2+d1/4α⋅ε) samples for a computationally efficient algorithm. We also provide a matching lower bound showing that our computationally inefficient algorithm has optimal sample complexity. We also extend our algorithms to various related problems, including mean testing of Gaussians with bounded but unknown covariance, uniformity testing of product distributions over {−1,1}d, and tolerant testing. Our results improve over the previous best work of Canonne et al.~\cite{CanonneKMUZ20} for both computationally efficient and inefficient algorithms, and even our computationally efficient algorithm matches the optimal \emph{non-private} sample complexity of O(d√α2) in many standard parameter settings. In addition, our results show that, surprisingly, private identity testing of d-dimensional Gaussians can be done with fewer samples than private identity testing of discrete distributions over a domain of size d \cite{AcharyaSZ18}, which refutes a conjectured lower bound of~\cite{CanonneKMUZ20}. 

   more » « less
5. Optimal Algorithms for Augmented Testing of Discrete Distributions

   Aliakbarpour, Maryam; Indyk, Piotr; Rubinfeld, Ronitt; Silwal, Sandeep (December 2024, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2024))

   We consider the problem of hypothesis testing for discrete distributions. In the standard model, where we have sample access to an underlying distribution p, extensive research has established optimal bounds for uniformity testing, identity testing (goodness of fit), and closeness testing (equivalence or two-sample testing). We explore these problems in a setting where a predicted data distribution, possibly derived from historical data or predictive machine learning models, is available. We demonstrate that such a predictor can indeed reduce the number of samples required for all three property testing tasks. The reduction in sample complexity depends directly on the predictor’s quality, measured by its total variation distance from p. A key advantage of our algorithms is their adaptability to the precision of the prediction. Specifically, our algorithms can self-adjust their sample complexity based on the accuracy of the available prediction, operating without any prior knowledge of the estimation’s accuracy (i.e. they are consistent). Additionally, we never use more samples than the standard approaches require, even if the predictions provide no meaningful information (i.e. they are also robust). We provide lower bounds to indicate that the improvements in sample complexity achieved by our algorithms are information-theoretically optimal. Furthermore, experimental results show that the performance of our algorithms on real data significantly exceeds our worst-case guarantees for sample complexity, demonstrating the practicality of our approach. 

   more » « less