skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Water temperature and catchment characteristics drive variation in carbon dioxide and methane emissions from small ponds in a peatland‐rich, high‐altitude tropical ecosystem
Abstract Inland waters release significant amounts of carbon into the atmosphere, with small ponds acting as hot spots. High variability and limited research make emissions from small waterbodies a major source of uncertainty, especially in underrepresented tropical ecosystems where unique drivers remain poorly understood. We evaluated the magnitude and sources of variability in emissions from small waterbodies of the páramo—a tropical ecoregion in the Andes mountains, characterized by carbon‐rich soils. We measured partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2), methane (pCH4) and CO2emissions from small (< 5000 m2) waterbodies, 11 ponds and 1 wetland, 3 times in the wet season and returned to 8 sites in the dry season. Sites were always supersaturated inpCH4(1096 ± 1482μatm), but occasionally undersaturated inpCO2(1224 ± 1585μatm). Variability between ponds was high and primarily driven by elevation and water temperature. Catchment soil‐water connectivity was also predictive ofpCO2. Mean wet‐season emission rates were 0.34 ± 0.54 g CO2‐C m−2d−1and 0.012 ± 0.018 g CH4‐C m−2d−1and surface area fluctuations were a large source of seasonal variability in some ponds. Though an open‐water transect of the wetland site was similar to ponds, we measured very highpCH4(1678 ± 2629μatm) andpCO2(5162 ± 3207μatm) along the wetland perimeter. Our findings provide essential insights for incorporating a significant yet understudied tropical ecosystem into the global carbon budget by confirming previous observations that small ponds can emit a disproportionately large amount of carbon to the atmosphere, but also highlighting the importance of variables other than pond size in controlling emission hot spots.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1847331
PAR ID:
10677442
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Limnology and Oceanography
Volume:
70
Issue:
12
ISSN:
0024-3590
Page Range / eLocation ID:
3832 to 3849
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract In the Arctic waterbodies are abundant and rapid thaw of permafrost is destabilizing the carbon cycle and changing hydrology. It is particularly important to quantify and accurately scale aquatic carbon emissions in arctic ecosystems. Recently available high-resolution remote sensing datasets capture the physical characteristics of arctic landscapes at unprecedented spatial resolution. We demonstrate how machine learning models can capitalize on these spatial datasets to greatly improve accuracy when scaling waterbody CO2and CH4fluxes across the YK Delta of south-west AK. We found that waterbody size and contour were strong predictors for aquatic CO2emissions, attributing greater than two-thirds of the influence to the scaling model. Small ponds (<0.001 km2) were hotspots of emissions, contributing fluxes several times their relative area, but were less than 5% of the total carbon budget. Small to medium lakes (0.001–0.1 km2) contributed the majority of carbon emissions from waterbodies. Waterbody CH4emissions were predicted by a combination of wetland landcover and related drivers, as well as watershed hydrology, and waterbody surface reflectance related to chromophoric dissolved organic matter. When compared to our machine learning approach, traditional scaling methods that did not account for relevant landscape characteristics overestimated waterbody CO2and CH4emissions by 26%–79% and 8%–53% respectively. This study demonstrates the importance of an integrated terrestrial-aquatic approach to improving estimates and uncertainty when scaling C emissions in the arctic. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract Ponds influence global carbon (C) cycling due to high rates of organic C (OC) burial and carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) emissions. Here, we quantified OC burial rates and CO2and CH4concentrations and fluxes in two ponds that were similar in size and gross primary production, but differed in depth and dominant primary producers. The deeper (3.9 m) Texas Hollow Pond was phytoplankton dominated with stronger and longer (143 d) stratification compared to the shallower (2.7 m) macrophyte‐dominated Mud Pond (85 d). Both ponds exhibited high CO2and CH4emissions and high OC burial, yet C pathways differed. Strong stratification in Texas Hollow Pond led to anoxic bottom waters, benthic CO2and CH4accumulation, and limited OC decomposition, whereas Mud Pond remained oxygenated with similar gas concentrations across the water column. Texas Hollow Pond had 2.6 times higher CO2emissions than Mud Pond, perhaps related to greater wetland C inputs in Texas Hollow. Despite similar diffusive CH4emissions between ponds, the weakly stratified Mud Pond had twice as much CH4ebullition, likely due to warmer waters and macrophyte‐derived OC fueling methanogenesis. In summary, slight differences in depth and light attenuation can regulate stratification, plant communities, oxygen availability, and C processing in ponds. Given that ponds are hotspots for C cycling and are sensitive to climate‐driven changes in stratification, understanding the mechanisms behind C processing is critical for local management and predicting global C budgets. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract Beaver engineering in the Arctic tundra induces hydrologic and geomorphic changes that are favorable to methane (CH 4 ) production. Beaver-mediated methane emissions are driven by inundation of existing vegetation, conversion from lotic to lentic systems, accumulation of organic rich sediments, elevated water tables, anaerobic conditions, and thawing permafrost. Ground-based measurements of CH 4 emissions from beaver ponds in permafrost landscapes are scarce, but hyperspectral remote sensing data (AVIRIS-NG) permit mapping of ‘hotspots’ thought to represent locations of high CH 4 emission. We surveyed a 429.5 km 2 area in Northwestern Alaska using hyperspectral airborne imaging spectroscopy at ∼5 m pixel resolution (14.7 million observations) to examine spatial relationships between CH 4 hotspots and 118 beaver ponds. AVIRIS-NG CH 4 hotspots covered 0.539% (2.3 km 2 ) of the study area, and were concentrated within 30 m of waterbodies. Comparing beaver ponds to all non-beaver waterbodies (including waterbodies >450 m from beaver-affected water), we found significantly greater CH 4 hotspot occurrences around beaver ponds, extending to a distance of 60 m. We found a 51% greater CH 4 hotspot occurrence ratio around beaver ponds relative to nearby non-beaver waterbodies. Dammed lake outlets showed no significant differences in CH 4 hotspot ratios compared to non-beaver lakes, likely due to little change in inundation extent. The enhancement in AVIRIS-NG CH 4 hotspots adjacent to beaver ponds is an example of a new disturbance regime, wrought by an ecosystem engineer, accelerating the effects of climate change in the Arctic. As beavers continue to expand into the Arctic and reshape lowland ecosystems, we expect continued wetland creation, permafrost thaw and alteration of the Arctic carbon cycle, as well as myriad physical and biological changes. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract Inland waters play a major role in global greenhouse gas (GHG) budgets. The smallest of these systems (i.e., ponds) have a particularly large—but poorly constrained—emissions footprint at the global scale. Much of this uncertainty is due to a poor understanding of temporal variability in emissions. Here, we conducted high‐resolution temporal sampling to quantify GHG exchange between four temperate constructed ponds and the atmosphere on an annual basis. We show these ponds are a net source of GHGs to the atmosphere (564.4 g CO2‐eq m−2 yr−1), driven by highly temporally variable diffusive methane (CH4) emissions. Diffusive CH4release to the atmosphere was twice as high during periods when the ponds had a stratified water column than when it was mixed. Ebullitive CH4release was also higher during stratification. Building ponds to favor mixed conditions thus presents an opportunity to minimize the global GHG footprint of future pond construction. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract Significant progress in permafrost carbon science made over the past decades include the identification of vast permafrost carbon stocks, the development of new pan‐Arctic permafrost maps, an increase in terrestrial measurement sites for CO2and methane fluxes, and important factors affecting carbon cycling, including vegetation changes, periods of soil freezing and thawing, wildfire, and other disturbance events. Process‐based modeling studies now include key elements of permafrost carbon cycling and advances in statistical modeling and inverse modeling enhance understanding of permafrost region C budgets. By combining existing data syntheses and model outputs, the permafrost region is likely a wetland methane source and small terrestrial ecosystem CO2sink with lower net CO2uptake toward higher latitudes, excluding wildfire emissions. For 2002–2014, the strongest CO2sink was located in western Canada (median: −52 g C m−2 y−1) and smallest sinks in Alaska, Canadian tundra, and Siberian tundra (medians: −5 to −9 g C m−2 y−1). Eurasian regions had the largest median wetland methane fluxes (16–18 g CH4m−2 y−1). Quantifying the regional scale carbon balance remains challenging because of high spatial and temporal variability and relatively low density of observations. More accurate permafrost region carbon fluxes require: (a) the development of better maps characterizing wetlands and dynamics of vegetation and disturbances, including abrupt permafrost thaw; (b) the establishment of new year‐round CO2and methane flux sites in underrepresented areas; and (c) improved models that better represent important permafrost carbon cycle dynamics, including non‐growing season emissions and disturbance effects. 
    more » « less