An official website of the United States government
{"Abstract":["The "Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2) Tuned Sea Ice Albedo" experiments were run to investigate the impact of sea ice snow albedo tuning on Arctic mean state and global responses. These were configured the same as the standard CESM2-CMIP6 runs, but with adjusted r_snw = 1.5 and dt_mlt = 1.0 in the sea ice model (cice) namelist. The original simulations were run by David Bailey, and the results were written up in Kay et al. 2022. Additional CESM2 Tuned Sea Ice Albedo experiments were run by Alice DuVivier to extend the dataset and include more frequent (daily) output as well as some modifications to the external forcing to account for biomass burning impacts on Arctic sea ice trends."]}
more »
« less
CESM2 Tuned Sea Ice Albedo Experiments
{"Abstract":["The original "CESM2 Tuned Sea Ice Albedo" experiments were run to investigate the impact of sea ice snow albedo tuning on Arctic mean state and global responses. These simulations were run by David Bailey, and the results were written up in Kay et al. 2022 [https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002679]. These were configured the same as the standard CMIP6 runs, but with adjusted r_snw=1.5 and dt_mlt=1.0 in the sea ice model (cice) namelist. (For local disk access, these data are all in the main directory and are not separated by case name.)Original experimentsControl run: b.e21.B1850.f09_g17.CMIP6-piControl.001_branch2 * Data are generally available years 811-1350 * These runs are fully coupled * Monthly Ocean, Sea Ice, and Atmosphere variables are availableHistorical runs: b.e21.BHIST.f09_g17.CMIP6-historical.01? * There are four ensemble members * Ensemble number 012 started in 1850 and ran to 2015 * Ensemble numbers 013, 014, 015 start in 1920, branched from ensemble 012 with a pertlim, and go to 2015 * These runs are fully coupled * Monthly Ocean, Sea Ice, and Atmosphere variables are availableFuture runs: b.e21.BSSP370cmip6.f09_g17.CMIP6-SSP3-7.0.? * The first three SSP runs (012,013,014) were configured the same as the CMIP6 scenario runs, but there was a bug in the future forcing * New runs were then done with the updated forcing (112, 113, 114, 115, 116) * The runs use standard CMIP6 SSP370 standard forcing, start in 2015 and go through 2100 * These runs are fully coupled * Monthly Ocean, Sea Ice, and Atmosphere variables are availableThere are also some experiments that are not fully coupled experiments: * e.e21.E1850.f09_g17.CMIP6-piControl.* * d.e21.f09_g17.{001,002,003,004,005}Additional ExperimentsThe additional CESM2 Tuned Sea Ice Albedo experiments were run to extend the dataset and include more frequent (daily) output as well as some modifications to the external forcing. This was done as part of a NSF Navigating the New Arctic (NNA) project (NSF #1928119): NNA Track 1: Collaborative Research: Maritime transportation in a changing Arctic: Navigating climate and sea ice uncertainties. These simulations were run by Alice DuVivier, and the data will be used in various studies. (For local disk access, these data are all in the main directory and are separated by case name.)Historical runs: b.e21.BHISTsmbb.f09_g17.CMIP6-historical.1? * There are five ensemble members: 118, 119, 120, 121, 122 * These ensembles start in 1990 and run through 2015 * These use smoothed biomass burning forcing (smbb), which uses the smoothed biomass burning forcing starting the 1990s. Information about the smoothed biomass burning impacts can be found in DeRepentigny et al. 2022 [https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abo2405] * These runs are fully coupled * Daily and Monthly Ocean, Sea Ice, and Atmosphere variables are available * Restart files are also available upon request to co-authorsFuture runs: b.e21.BSSP370cmip6.f09_g17.CMIP6-SSP3-7.0.2? * There are five ensemble members: 218, 219, 220, 221, 222 * The runs use standard CMIP6 SSP370 standard forcing, start in 2015 and go through 2100. They are continued from the SMBB historical runs (above) * These runs are fully coupled * Daily and Monthly Ocean, Sea Ice, and Atmosphere variables are available * Restart files are also available upon request to co-authors * These runs were done on the Derecho supercomputer (instead of Cheyenne, which was used for all the above experiments)"]}
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1928119
- PAR ID:
- 10680123
- Publisher / Repository:
- Arctic Data Center: https://arcticdata.io/catalog/view/urn%3Auuid%3A9c55928f-95b5-44f8-91a3-f2d7fc5c5540
- Date Published:
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE > SEA LEVEL PRESSURE EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE > SURFACE TEMPERATURE EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE > UPPER AIR TEMPERATURE EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > ATMOSPHERIC WATER VAPOR > WATER VAPOR INDICATORS > HUMIDITY > SPECIFIC HUMIDITY EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > ATMOSPHERIC WINDS > SURFACE WINDS > U/V WIND COMPONENTS EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > ATMOSPHERIC WINDS > WIND DYNAMICS > VERTICAL WIND VELOCITY/SPEED EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > PRECIPITATION > LIQUID PRECIPITATION > RAIN EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > PRECIPITATION > PRECIPITATION PROFILES > LATENT HEAT FLUX
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Size: 10.043 Tbytes Other: NetCDF
- Size(s):
- 10.043 Tbytes
- Right(s):
- Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
- Institution:
- University Corporation For Atmospheric Research UCARNSF National Center for Atmospheric Research NSF NCARComputational and Information Systems Laboratory CISLInformation Services Division ISDData Engineering and Curation Section DECS
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
The High-resolution (6 kilometer (km)) Ice-Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System (HIOMAS) is used to simulate the evolution of sea ice for the Arctic Ocean and adjacent areas, including the Barents Sea, Norwegian Sea, Greenland Sea, Baffin Bay, and waters along Northwest Passage, over the period 2010 to 2069. The hindcast and future forcing over the period is from one of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) models, the CNRM-CM6-1-HR global climate model (GCM) run at the National Center for Meteorological Research, Météo-France and CNRS Laboratory (CNRM). Monthly mean sea ice thickness (meters (m)) is provided over 2010 to 2069 in NETCDF file format, with model grid information such as latitudes and longitudes of model grid cells included. I have archived future projection of monthly mean sea ice thickness files over 2010 to 2069 in https://pscfiles.apl.uw.edu/zhang/HIOMAS_6km/. The files are in netcdf format, which are created by running HIOMAS using the future projection forcing of the CNRM-CM6-1-HR GCM run conducted at the National Center for Meteorological Research, Météo-France and CNRS Laboratory (CNRM). Martin interpolated the forcing onto the new, expanded HIOMAS grid. There is a readme.txt file.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Abstract. The Arctic is warming 2 to 3 times faster than the global average, partly due to changes in short-lived climate forcers (SLCFs) including aerosols. In order to study the effects of atmospheric aerosols in this warming, recent past (1990–2014) and future (2015–2050) simulations have been carried out using the GISS-E2.1 Earth system model to study the aerosol burdens and their radiative and climate impacts over the Arctic (>60∘ N), using anthropogenic emissions from the Eclipse V6b and the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) databases, while global annual mean greenhouse gas concentrations were prescribed and kept fixed in all simulations. Results showed that the simulations have underestimated observed surface aerosol levels, in particular black carbon (BC) and sulfate (SO42-), by more than 50 %, with the smallest biases calculated for the atmosphere-only simulations, where winds are nudged to reanalysis data. CMIP6 simulations performed slightly better in reproducing the observed surface aerosol concentrations and climate parameters, compared to the Eclipse simulations. In addition, simulations where atmosphere and ocean are fully coupled had slightly smaller biases in aerosol levels compared to atmosphere-only simulations without nudging. Arctic BC, organic aerosol (OA), and SO42- burdens decrease significantly in all simulations by 10 %–60 % following the reductions of 7 %–78 % in emission projections, with the Eclipse ensemble showing larger reductions in Arctic aerosol burdens compared to the CMIP6 ensemble. For the 2030–2050 period, the Eclipse ensemble simulated a radiative forcing due to aerosol–radiation interactions (RFARI) of -0.39±0.01 W m−2, which is −0.08 W m−2 larger than the 1990–2010 mean forcing (−0.32 W m−2), of which -0.24±0.01 W m−2 was attributed to the anthropogenic aerosols. The CMIP6 ensemble simulated a RFARI of −0.35 to −0.40 W m−2 for the same period, which is −0.01 to −0.06 W m−2 larger than the 1990–2010 mean forcing of −0.35 W m−2. The scenarios with little to no mitigation (worst-case scenarios) led to very small changes in the RFARI, while scenarios with medium to large emission mitigations led to increases in the negative RFARI, mainly due to the decrease in the positive BC forcing and the decrease in the negative SO42- forcing. The anthropogenic aerosols accounted for −0.24 to −0.26 W m−2 of the net RFARI in 2030–2050 period, in Eclipse and CMIP6 ensembles, respectively. Finally, all simulations showed an increase in the Arctic surface air temperatures throughout the simulation period. By 2050, surface air temperatures are projected to increase by 2.4 to 2.6 ∘C in the Eclipse ensemble and 1.9 to 2.6 ∘C in the CMIP6 ensemble, compared to the 1990–2010 mean. Overall, results show that even the scenarios with largest emission reductions leads to similar impact on the future Arctic surface air temperatures and sea-ice extent compared to scenarios with smaller emission reductions, implying reductions of greenhouse emissions are still necessary to mitigate climate change.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)The Arctic has experienced a warming rate higher than the global mean in the past decades, but previous studies show that there are large uncertainties associated with future Arctic temperature projections. In this study, near- surface mean temperatures in the Arctic are analyzed from 22 models participating in phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). Compared with the ERA5 reanalysis, most CMIP6 models underestimate the observed mean temperature in the Arctic during 1979–2014. The largest cold biases are found over the Greenland Sea the Barents Sea, and the Kara Sea. Under the SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, the multimodel ensemble mean of 22 CMIP6 models exhibits significant Arctic warming in the future and the warming rate is more than twice that of the global/Northern Hemisphere mean. Model spread is the largest contributor to the overall uncertainty in projections, which accounts for 55.4% of the total uncertainty at the start of projections in 2015 and remains at 32.9% at the end of projections in 2095. Internal variability uncertainty accounts for 39.3% of the total uncertainty at the start of projections but decreases to 6.5% at the end of the twenty-first century, while scenario uncertainty rapidly increases from 5.3% to 60.7% over the period from 2015 to 2095. It is found that the largest model uncertainties are consistent cold bias in the oceanic regions in the models, which is connected with excessive sea ice area caused by the weak Atlantic poleward heat transport. These results suggest that large intermodel spread and uncertainties exist in the CMIP6 models’ simulation and projection of the Arctic near- surface temperature and that there are different responses over the ocean and land in the Arctic to greenhouse gas forcing. Future research needs to pay more attention to the different characteristics and mechanisms of Arctic Ocean and land warming to reduce the spread.more » « less
-
Abstract. The ice sheet model intercomparison project for CMIP6 (ISMIP6) effort brings together the ice sheet and climate modeling communities to gain understanding of the ice sheet contribution to sea level rise. ISMIP6 conducts stand-alone ice sheet experiments that use space- and time-varying forcing derived from atmosphere–ocean coupled global climate models (AOGCMs) to reflect plausible trajectories for climate projections. The goal of this study is to recommend a subset of CMIP5 AOGCMs (three core and three targeted) to produce forcing for ISMIP6 stand-alone ice sheet simulations, based on (i) their representation of current climate near Antarctica and Greenland relative to observations and (ii) their ability to sample a diversity of projected atmosphere and ocean changes over the 21st century. The selection is performed separately for Greenland and Antarctica. Model evaluation over the historical period focuses on variables used to generate ice sheet forcing. For stage (i), we combine metrics of atmosphere and surface ocean state (annual- and seasonal-mean variables over large spatial domains) with metrics of time-mean subsurface ocean temperature biases averaged over sectors of the continental shelf. For stage (ii), we maximize the diversity of climate projections among the best-performing models. Model selection is also constrained by technical limitations, such as availability of required data from RCP2.6 and RCP8.5 projections. The selected top three CMIP5 climate models are CCSM4, MIROC-ESM-CHEM, and NorESM1-M for Antarctica and HadGEM2-ES, MIROC5, and NorESM1-M for Greenland. This model selection was designed specifically for ISMIP6 but can be adapted for other applications.more » « less
