An official website of the United States government
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest class of cell-surface receptor proteins with important functions in signal transduction and often serve as therapeutic drug targets. With the rapidly growing public data on three dimensional (3D) structures of GPCRs and GPCR-ligand interactions, computational prediction of GPCR ligand binding becomes a convincing option to high throughput screening and other experimental approaches during the beginning phases of ligand discovery. In this work, we set out to computationally uncover and understand the binding of a single ligand to GPCRs from several different families. Three-dimensional structural comparisons of the GPCRs that bind to the same ligand revealed local 3D structural similarities and often these regions overlap with locations of binding pockets. These pockets were found to be similar (based on backbone geometry and side-chain orientation using APoc), and they correlate positively with electrostatic properties of the pockets. Moreover, the more similar the pockets, the more likely a ligand binding to the pockets will interact with similar residues, have similar conformations, and produce similar binding affinities across the pockets. These findings can be exploited to improve protein function inference, drug repurposing and drug toxicity prediction, and accelerate the development of new drugs.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on January 1, 2027
Assessing the potential of deep learning for protein–ligand docking
Abstract The effects of ligand binding on protein structures and their in vivo functions carry numerous implications for modern biomedical research and biotechnology development efforts such as drug discovery. Although several deep learning (DL) methods and benchmarks designed for protein–ligand docking have recently been introduced, so far no previous works have systematically studied the behaviour of the latest docking and structure prediction methods within the broadly applicable context of: (1) using predicted (apo) protein structures for docking (for example, for applicability to new proteins); (2) binding multiple (cofactor) ligands concurrently to a given target protein (for example, for enzyme design); and (3) having no previous knowledge of binding pockets (for example, for generalization to unknown pockets). To enable a deeper understanding of the real-world utility of docking methods, we introduce PoseBench, a comprehensive benchmark for broadly applicable protein–ligand docking. PoseBench enables researchers to rigorously and systematically evaluate DL methods for apo-to-holo protein–ligand docking and protein–ligand structure prediction using both primary ligand and multiligand benchmark datasets, the latter of which we introduce to the DL community. Empirically, using PoseBench, we find that: (1) DL cofolding methods generally outperform comparable conventional and DL docking baseline algorithms, but popular methods such as AlphaFold 3 are still challenged by prediction targets with new protein–ligand binding poses; (2) certain DL cofolding methods are highly sensitive to their input multiple sequence alignments, whereas others are not; and (3) DL methods struggle to strike a balance between structural accuracy and chemical specificity when predicting new or multiligand protein targets.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2308699
- PAR ID:
- 10684354
- Publisher / Repository:
- Springer Nature
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Nature Machine Intelligence
- Volume:
- 8
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 2522-5839
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 32 to 41
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract While significant advances have been made in predicting static protein structures, the inherent dynamics of proteins, modulated by ligands, are crucial for understanding protein function and facilitating drug discovery. Traditional docking methods, frequently used in studying protein-ligand interactions, typically treat proteins as rigid. While molecular dynamics simulations can propose appropriate protein conformations, they’re computationally demanding due to rare transitions between biologically relevant equilibrium states. In this study, we present DynamicBind, a deep learning method that employs equivariant geometric diffusion networks to construct a smooth energy landscape, promoting efficient transitions between different equilibrium states. DynamicBind accurately recovers ligand-specific conformations from unbound protein structures without the need for holo-structures or extensive sampling. Remarkably, it demonstrates state-of-the-art performance in docking and virtual screening benchmarks. Our experiments reveal that DynamicBind can accommodate a wide range of large protein conformational changes and identify cryptic pockets in unseen protein targets. As a result, DynamicBind shows potential in accelerating the development of small molecules for previously undruggable targets and expanding the horizons of computational drug discovery.more » « less
-
Protein–protein docking is a cornerstone of computational structural biology, yet its reliability for large, multimeric assemblies remains uncertain. Standard workflows typically include geometry optimization or molecular dynamics equilibration to relieve local strains and improve input quality, but the extent to which these preparatory steps alter docking outcomes has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we address this question using the mitochondrial chaperonin Hsp60, a dynamic double-ring complex essential for protein folding, and MIX, a kinetoplastid-specific protein with unresolved function, as a stress test system. By comparing docking predictions across minimized, equilibrated, and ensemble-refined structures of Hsp60 in three conformational states (apo, ATP-bound, and ATP–Hsp10), we show that structural relaxation profoundly reshapes the docking landscape. Minimization alone often yielded favorable scores but localized binding, while longer MD trajectories exposed alternative sites, including central cavity, equatorial ATP pocket, and apical domain, each consistent with distinct regulatory hypotheses. These findings reveal that docking outcomes are highly sensitive to receptor preparation, especially in complexes undergoing large conformational transitions. More broadly, our study highlights an underappreciated vulnerability of docking pipelines and calls for ensemble-based and dynamics-aware approaches when predicting interactions in large biomolecular machines.more » « less
-
The Alchemical Transfer Method (ATM) is herein validated against the relative binding free energies of a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes. We employed a streamlined setup workflow, a bespoke force field, and the AToM-OpenMM software to compute the relative binding free energies (RBFE) of the benchmark set prepared by Schindler and collaborators at Merck KGaA. This benchmark set includes examples of standard small R-group ligand modifications as well as more challenging scenarios, such as large R-group changes, scaffold hopping, formal charge changes, and charge-shifting transformations. The novel coordinate perturbation scheme and a dual-topology approach of ATM address some of the challenges of single-topology alchemical relative binding free energy methods. Specifically, ATM eliminates the need for splitting electrostatic and Lennard-Jones interactions, atom mapping, defining ligand regions, and post-corrections for charge-changing perturbations. Thus, ATM is simpler and more broadly applicable than conventional alchemical methods, especially for scaffold-hopping and charge-changing transformations. Here, we performed well over 500 relative binding free energy calculations for eight protein targets and found that ATM achieves accuracy comparable to existing state-of-the-art methods, albeit with larger statistical fluctuations. We discuss insights into specific strengths and weaknesses of the ATM method that will inform future deployments. This study confirms that ATM is applicable as a production tool for relative binding free energy (RBFE) predictions across a wide range of perturbation types within a unified, open-source framework.more » « less
-
ABSTRACT Predicting the structure of ligands bound to proteins is a foundational problem in modern biotechnology and drug discovery, yet little is known about how to combine the predictions of protein‐ligand structure (poses) produced by the latest deep learning methods to identify the best poses and how to accurately estimate the binding affinity between a protein target and a list of ligand candidates. Further, a blind benchmarking and assessment of protein‐ligand structure and binding affinity prediction is necessary to ensure it generalizes well to new settings. Towards this end, we introduceMULTICOM_ligand, a deep learning‐based protein‐ligand structure and binding affinity prediction ensemble featuring structural consensus ranking for unsupervised pose ranking and a new deep generative flow matching model for joint structure and binding affinity prediction. Notably,MULTICOM_ligand ranked among the top‐5 ligand prediction methods in both protein‐ligand structure prediction and binding affinity prediction in the 16th Critical Assessment of Techniques for Structure Prediction (CASP16), demonstrating its efficacy and utility for real‐world drug discovery efforts. The source code for MULTICOM_ligand is freely available on GitHub.more » « less
