<?xml-model href='http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng' schematypens='http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0'?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
	<teiHeader>
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt><title level='a'>Importance of seasonality and watershed size on carbon dioxide evasion in Arctic streams</title></titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher>ADC</publisher>
				<date>12/08/2025</date>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<bibl> 
					<idno type="par_id">10689326</idno>
					<idno type="doi">10.1088/2752-664X/ae212d</idno>
					<title level='j'>Environmental Research: Ecology</title>
<idno>2752-664X</idno>
<biblScope unit="volume">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>					

					<author>Macall Hock</author><author>Anna K Liljedahl</author><author>Donatella Zona</author>
				</bibl>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<profileDesc>
			<abstract><ab><![CDATA[<title>Abstract</title> <p>Arctic headwater streams play a crucial role in the carbon cycle, contributing disproportionately to carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) evasion despite their small size and surface area. In this study, we examined how seasonal hydrologic patterns, such as spring snowmelt (freshet), mid-summer low-flows (baseflow) and the late summer period in August and early September (late-season), influence CO<sub>2</sub>evasion in Arctic headwater streams (1–9 km<sup>2</sup>basin size; 1–4 stream orders) near Utqiagvik, Alaska. During three summers, we measured key environmental parameters (CO<sub>2</sub>partial pressure, water temperature, discharge, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), gas transfer velocity) and CO<sub>2</sub>evasion using a floating chamber. CO<sub>2</sub>evasion followed distinct seasonal patterns with the highest evasion rates during freshet, followed by the late-season, and the lowest during baseflow. Despite its short duration (10 d), freshet accounted for 22% more total CO<sub>2</sub>evasion than the 36 d late-season period. The descending peakflow within freshet had the highest median evasion rate (2486 mg C–CO<sub>2</sub>m<sup>−2</sup>d<sup>−1</sup>) of the entire season, while the ascending portion of the peakflow had the lowest (448 mg C–CO<sub>2</sub>m<sup>−2</sup>d<sup>−1</sup>). These two freshet periods showed a statistically significant difference (<italic>p</italic>< 0.05). Water temperature, DOC, and<italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>explained 35%, 30% and 67% of freshet evasion variability, respectively. No measured parameters reliably predicted CO<sub>2</sub>evasion for the baseflow or late-season periods, suggesting increased hydrologic and biological complexity. The stream showed supply-limitation during freshet but transitioned to chemostatic behavior thereafter. By synthesizing our measurements with previously published data, we show that small streams (<1 km<sup>2</sup>watersheds) exhibit ∼10-times the CO<sub>2</sub>evasion rates than large waterways (>1000 km<sup>2</sup>). We also find that across the Arctic, only ∼15% of riverine CO<sub>2</sub>measurements capture the freshet period. Together, the omission of small streams and the underrepresentation of freshet likely lead to a systematic underestimation of CO<sub>2</sub>losses from Arctic surface waters to the atmosphere.</p>]]></ab></abstract>
		</profileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text><body><div/></body></text>
</TEI>
