The earthquake catalog includes high-precision hypocenter relocations for 390,334 earthquakes recorded during the 2016-2017 Amatrice (Central Italy) earthquake sequence. The relative locations were computed by double-difference inversion of a combination of INGV phase picks and cross-correlation differential times measured from correlated seismograms with correlation coefficients > 0.7. Planes of normal faults (idx=1-5) are derived from PCA analysis of 2 months of aftershock locations in the CAT4 catalog following large events. Surfaces of detachment faults (idx=7-10) are derived from mapping out the location of correlated earthquakes. Citation: Waldhauser, F., Michele, M., Chiaraluce, L., Di Stefano, R., & Schaff, D. P. (2021). Fault planes, fault zone structure and detachment fragmentation resolved with highprecision aftershock locations of the 2016-2017 central Italy sequence. Geophysical Research Letters, 48, e2021GL092918. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092918
more »
« less
Dataset for "Fault Network Geometry Modulates Earthquake Source Spectra Across Scales"
Abstract: The datasets provided here are from the paper “Lee, J., Tsai, V. C., Trugman, D. T., Hirth, G., & Chatterjee, A. (2025). Fault network geometry modulates earthquake source spectra across scales. Geophysical Research Letters, 52, e2025GL115592. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL115592". They include earthquake stress-drop and fault misalignment (Rm) measurements from Southern California (Shearer et al., 2022), Japan (Oth, 2013) and Italy (Kemna et al., 2021). The SCARDEC datasets provide estimated corner frequencies, moment-rate roughness (Radiated Energy Enhancement Factor; REEF) and mean Kagan angles computed within proximity of each event (count#). For more details, please refer to the paper. Kemna, K. B., Verdecchia, A., & Harrington, R. M. (2021). Spatio-temporal evolution of earthquake static stress drop values in the 2016–2017 central Italy seismic sequence. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126, e2021JB022566. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB0225 Oth, A. (2013). On the characteristics of earthquake stress release variations in Japan. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 377–378, 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.06.037 Shearer, P. M., Abercrombie, R. E., & Trugman, D. T. (2022). Improved stress drop estimates for M 1.5 to 4 earthquakes in southern California from 1996 to 2019. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 127, e2022JB024243. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB024243 Vallée, M., Charléty, J., Ferreira, A. M. G., Delouis, B., & Vergoz, J. (2011). SCARDEC: A new technique for the rapid determination of seismic moment magnitude, focal mechanism and source time functions for large earthquakes using body-wave deconvolution. Geophysical Journal International, 184(1), 338–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04836.x
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2146640
- PAR ID:
- 10693376
- Publisher / Repository:
- Zenodo
- Date Published:
- Edition / Version:
- 1.1.1
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Right(s):
- Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Earthquake source spectra provide unique insights into the earthquake rupture process. Motivated by previous research suggesting that complex fault geometries enhance high‐frequency seismic radiation, we study the influence of fault network geometry on earthquake source spectra using multiple independent observations. At regional scales, we examine correlations of stress drop measurements with surface fault trace misalignment in Southern California, Japan, and Central Italy. At a global scale, we examine correlations of moment‐rate function complexity of large earthquakes with focal mechanism variability, a proxy for local fault complexity. Despite significant scatter in the observations, we find overall consistent positive correlations. The concept that elastic interactions of discrete fault structures during the earthquake rupture process generates high‐frequency ground motions offers a coherent framework for interpreting our observations. These findings suggest that variations in fault complexity explain why some earthquakes produce stronger high‐frequency ground motions than others.more » « less
-
Abstract The timing and failure conditions of an earthquake are governed by the interplay between fault reloading and restrengthening. The moment‐recurrence time behavior of repeating earthquakes can give observational estimates of fault healing rates; however, it is difficult to link these observed healing rates to laboratory studies of frictional healing in part because of uncertainty in lithology. Here, we study the 2011 Prague earthquake sequence, which includes repeating earthquakes in the Arbuckle group and the granitic basement, and compare them to laboratory experiments on samples of the Arbuckle and Troy granite (representative of the basement rock) (Okamoto et al., 2025,https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JB030573). We find three spatially distinct groups of repeating earthquakes with different moment‐recurrence behavior: (a) constant moment‐recurrence time in the Arbuckle group, (b) scattered moment‐recurrence time at the intersection of the foreshock‐mainshock fault in the granitic basement, and (c) moment‐predictable behavior outside of the foreshock‐mainshock fault intersection also in the granitic basement. Our observation of stagnant healing for repeating sequences in the Arbuckle group is consistent with laboratory observations of low healing rates for moderately high pore fluid pressures in Arbuckle samples. For the moment‐predictable group, the source radius that is required in order to match healing rates is consistent with source radius estimations when taking into account reasonable attenuation of theP‐pulse width. Overall, we observe diverse healing behaviors in the seismic families that are consistent with laboratory healing rates, providing seismic evidence that contact‐scale frictional mechanisms are relevant to large‐scale earthquake dynamics.more » « less
-
Abstract Elevated seismic noise for moderate‐size earthquakes recorded at teleseismic distances has limited our ability to see their complexity. We develop a machine‐learning‐based algorithm to separate noise and earthquake signals that overlap in frequency. The multi‐task encoder‐decoder model is built around a kernel pre‐trained on local (e.g., short distances) earthquake data (Yin et al., 2022,https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggac290) and is modified by continued learning with high‐quality teleseismic data. We denoise teleseismic P waves of deep Mw5.0+ earthquakes and use the clean P waves to estimate source characteristics with reduced uncertainties of these understudied earthquakes. We find a scaling of moment and duration to beM0 ≃ τ4, and a resulting strong scaling of stress drop and radiated energy with magnitude ( and ). The median radiation efficiency is 5%, a low value compared to crustal earthquakes. Overall, we show that deep earthquakes have weak rupture directivity and few subevents, suggesting a simple model of a circular crack with radial rupture propagation is appropriate. When accounting for their respective scaling with earthquake size, we find no systematic depth variations of duration, stress drop, or radiated energy within the 100–700 km depth range. Our study supports the findings of Poli and Prieto (2016,https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jb013521) with a doubled amount of earthquakes investigated and with earthquakes of lower magnitudes.more » « less
-
Abstract Dynamic earthquake triggering is commonly identified through the temporal correlation between increased seismicity rates and global earthquakes that are possible triggering events. However, correlation does not imply causation. False positives may occur when unrelated seismicity rate changes coincidently occur at around the time of candidate triggers. We investigate the expected false positive rate in Southern California with globalM ≥ 6 earthquakes as candidate triggers. We compute the false positive rate by applying the statistical tests used by DeSalvio and Fan (2023),https://doi.org/10.1029/2023jb026487to synthetic earthquake catalogs with no real dynamic triggering. We find a false positive rate of ∼3.5%–8.5% when realistic earthquake clustering is present, consistent with the 95% confidence typically used in seismology. However, when this false positive rate is applied to the tens of thousands of spatial‐temporal windows in Southern California tested in DeSalvio and Fan (2023),https://doi.org/10.1029/2023jb026487, thousands of false positives are expected. The expected false positive occurrence is large enough to explain the observed apparent triggering following 70% of large global earthquakes (DeSalvio & Fan, 2023,https://doi.org/10.1029/2023jb026487), without requiring any true dynamic triggering. Aside from the known triggering from the nearby El Mayor‐Cucapah, Mexico, earthquake, the spatial and temporal characteristics of the reported triggering are indistinguishable from random false positives. This implies that best practice for dynamic triggering studies that depend on temporal correlation is to estimate the false positive rate and investigate whether the observed apparent triggering is distinguishable from the correlations that may occur by chance.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
