This work concerns the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing process. We developed and implemented a physics-based approach for layerwise control of the thermal history of an LPBF part. Controlling the thermal history of an LPBF part during the process is crucial as it influences critical-to-quality characteristics, such as porosity, solidified microstructure, cracking, surface finish, and geometric integrity, among others. Typically, LPBF processing parameters are optimized through exhaustive empirical build-and-test procedures. However, because thermal history varies with geometry, processing parameters seldom transfer between different part shapes. Furthermore, particularly in complex parts, the thermal history can vary significantly between layers leading to both within-part and between-part variation in properties. In this work, we devised an autonomous physics-based controller to maintain the thermal history within a desired window by optimizing the processing parameters layer by layer. This approach is a form of digital feedforward model predictive control. To demonstrate the approach, five thermal history control strategies were tested on four unique part geometries (20 total parts) made from stainless steel 316L alloy. The layerwise control of the thermal history significantly reduced variations in grain size and improved geometric accuracy and surface finish. This work provides a pathway for rapid, shape-agnostic qualification of LPBF part quality through control of the causal thermal history as opposed to expensive and cumbersome trial-and-error parameter optimization.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on March 1, 2027
Thermal Modeling and Feedforward Control for Defect Mitigation in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process
Modeling and control of the spatiotemporal temperature distribution (thermal history) in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is critical because the thermal history governs defects, such as porosity, poor surface finish, cracking, and deformation. This article presents a coupled physics-based computational modeling and feedforward process control framework for regulating the thermal history in LPBF-processed parts. Existing LPBF process optimization relies on empirical parameter tuning by manufacturing and testing of simple, standardized coupon geometries. Empirical coupon-based optimization inherently disregards the geometry-dependent effect of thermal history on defect formation. Consequently, process parameters optimized based on coupon studies, when used for manufacturing real-world components, often result in build failures and defects. To address this limitation, a rapid graph theory-based computational model was coupled to a feedforward control (FFC) algorithm. The approach is implemented for manufacturing a topology-optimized Inconel 718 aerospace component (GE bracket). The model-guided FFC approach maintains a constant end-of-cycle (interpass or interlayer) temperature across layers by adjusting the laser power and velocity. The processing parameters are adjusted in silico—offline and prior to manufacturing—within the thermal model. Compared to its empirically optimized counterpart, the FFC-processed GE bracket exhibited three characteristics favorable to functional integrity and production: (i) meltpool instability-induced porosity was not observed; (ii) thermal-induced deformation, dross formation, and recoater contact damage were significantly mitigated; and (iii) FFC-induced improvements enabled the part to be manufactured with 45% less support mass, resulting in a 20% reduction in the as-built part weight (with the part design unchanged). This work thus underscores the potential of physics-based control, as opposed to empirical optimization, to mitigate defects in LPBF parts and accelerate their practical deployment.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10693509
- Publisher / Repository:
- ASME Transactions
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
- Volume:
- 148
- Issue:
- 3
- ISSN:
- 1087-1357
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- laser powder bed fusion, thermal history, feedforward control, graph theory, GE bracket, additive manufacturing, control and automation, modeling and simulation, rapid prototyping and solid freeform fabrication, sensing, monitoring, and diagnostics, Inconel 718
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
We developed and applied a model-based feedforward control approach to reduce temperature-induced flaw formation in the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing process. The feedforward control is built upon three basic steps. First, the thermal history of the part is rapidly predicted using a mesh-free graph theory model. Second, thermal history metrics are extracted from the model to identify regions of heat buildup, symptomatic of flaw formation. Third, process parameters are changed layer-by-layer based on insights from the thermal model. This technique was validated with two identical build plates (Inconel 718). Parts on the first build plate were made under manufacturer recommended nominal process parameters. Parts on the second build plate were made with model optimized process parameters. Results were validated with in-situ infrared thermography, and materials characterization techniques. Parts produced under controlled processing exhibited superior geometric accuracy and resolution, finer grain size, and increased microhardness.more » « less
-
Abstract This work pertains to the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing process. The goal of this work is to mitigate the expense and time required for qualification of laser powder bed fusion processed parts. In pursuit of this goal, the objective of this work is to develop and apply a physics-based model predictive control strategy to modulate the thermal history before the part is built. The key idea is to determine a desired thermal history for a given part a priori to printing using a physics-based model. Subsequently, a model predictive control strategy is developed to attain the desired thermal history by changing the laser power layer-by-layer. This is an important area of research because the spatiotemporal distribution of temperature within the part (also known as the thermal history) influences flaw formation, microstructure evolution, and surface/geometric integrity, all of which ultimately determine the mechanical properties of the part. Currently, laser powder bed fusion parts are qualified using a build-and-test approach wherein parameters are optimized by printing simple test coupons, followed by examining their properties via materials characterization and testing — a cumbersome and expensive process that often takes years. These parameters, once optimized, are maintained constant throughout the process for a part. However, thermal history is a function of over 50 processing parameters including material properties and part design, consequently, the current approach of parameter optimization based on empirical testing of simple test coupons seldom transfers successfully to complex, practical parts. Rather than instinctive process parameter optimization, the model predictive control strategy presents a radically different approach to LPBF part qualification that is based on understanding and modulating the causal thermal physics of the process. The approach has three steps: (Step 1) Predict – given a part geometry, use a rapid, mesh-less physics-based simulation model to predict its thermal history, analyze the predicted thermal history trend, isolate potential red flag problems such as heat buildup, and set a desired thermal history that corrects deleterious trends. (Step 2) Parse – iteratively simulate the thermal history as a function of various laser power levels layer-by-layer over a fixed time horizon. (Step 3) Select – the laser power that provides the closest match to the desired thermal history. Repeat Steps 2 and 3 until the part is completely built. We demonstrate through experiments with various geometries two advantages of this model predictive control strategy when applied to laser powder bed fusion: (i) prevent part failures due to overheating and distortion, while mitigating the need for anchoring supports; and (ii) improve surface integrity of hard to access internal surfaces.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Despite its potential to overcome the design and processing barriers of traditional subtractive and formative manufacturing techniques, the use of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) metal additive manufacturing is currently limited due to its tendency to create flaws. A multitude of LPBF-related flaws, such as part-level deformation, cracking, and porosity are linked to the spatiotemporal temperature distribution in the part during the process. The temperature distribution, also called the thermal history, is a function of several factors encompassing material properties, part geometry and orientation, processing parameters, placement of supports, among others. These broad range of factors are difficult and expensive to optimize through empirical testing alone. Consequently, fast and accurate models to predict the thermal history are valuable for mitigating flaw formation in LPBF-processed parts. In our prior works, we developed a graph theory-based approach for predicting the temperature distribution in LPBF parts. This mesh-free approach was compared with both non-proprietary and commercial finite element packages, and the thermal history predictions were experimentally validated with in- situ infrared thermal imaging data. It was found that the graph theory-derived thermal history predictions converged within 30–50% of the time of non-proprietary finite element analysis for a similar level of prediction error. However, these prior efforts were based on small prismatic and cylinder-shaped LPBF parts. In this paper, our objective was to scale the graph theory approach to predict the thermal history of large volume, complex geometry LPBF parts. To realize this objective, we developed and applied three computational strategies to predict the thermal history of a stainless steel (SAE 316L) impeller having outside diameter 155 mm and vertical height 35 mm (700 layers). The impeller was processed on a Renishaw AM250 LPBF system and required 16 h to complete. During the process, in-situ layer-by-layer steady state surface temperature measurements for the impeller were obtained using a calibrated longwave infrared thermal camera. As an example of the outcome, on implementing one of the three strategies reported in this work, which did not reduce or simplify the part geometry, the thermal history of the impeller was predicted with approximate mean absolute error of 6% (standard deviation 0.8%) and root mean square error 23 K (standard deviation 3.7 K). Moreover, the thermal history was simulated within 40 min using desktop computing, which is considerably less than the 16 h required to build the impeller part. Furthermore, the graph theory thermal history predictions were compared with a proprietary LPBF thermal modeling software and non-proprietary finite element simulation. For a similar level of root mean square error (28 K), the graph theory approach converged in 17 min, vs. 4.5 h for non-proprietary finite element analysis.more » « less
-
The long-term goal of this work is to predict and control the microstructure evolution in metal additive manufacturing processes. In pursuit of this goal, we developed and applied an approach which combines physics-based thermal modeling with data-driven machine learning to predict two important microstructure-related characteristics, namely, the meltpool depth and primary dendritic arm spacing in Nickel Alloy 718 parts made using the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process. Microstructure characteristics are critical determinants of functional physical properties, e.g., yield strength and fatigue life. Currently, the microstructure of LPBF parts is optimized through a cumbersome build-and-characterize empirical approach. Rapid and accurate models for predicting microstructure evolution are therefore valuable to reduce process development time and achieve consistent properties. However, owing to their computational complexity, existing physics-based models for predicting the microstructure evolution are limited to a few layers, and are challenging to scale to practical parts. This paper addresses the aforementioned research gap via a novel physics and data integrated modeling approach. The approach consists of two steps. First, a rapid, part-level computational thermal model was used to predict the temperature distribution and cooling rate in the entire part before it was printed. Second, the foregoing physics-based thermal history quantifiers were used as inputs to a simple machine learning model (support vector machine) trained to predict the meltpool depth and primary dendritic arm spacing based on empirical materials characterization data. As an example of its efficacy, when tested on a separate set of samples from a different build, the approach predicted the primary dendritic arm spacing with root mean squared error ≈ 110 nm. This work thus presents an avenue for future physics-based optimization and control of microstructure evolution in LPBF.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
