An official website of the United States government
Abstract Global environmental change is causing a decline in biodiversity with profound implications for ecosystem functioning and stability. It remains unclear how global change factors interact to influence the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning and stability. Here, using data from a 24-year experiment, we investigate the impacts of nitrogen (N) addition, enriched CO2(eCO2), and their interactions on the biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationship (complementarity effects and selection effects), the biodiversity-ecosystem stability relationship (species asynchrony and species stability), and their connections. We show that biodiversity remains positively related to both ecosystem productivity (functioning) and its stability under N addition and eCO2. However, the combination of N addition and eCO2diminishes the effects of biodiversity on complementarity and selection effects. In contrast, N addition and eCO2do not alter the relationship between biodiversity and either species asynchrony or species stability. Under ambient conditions, both complementarity and selection effects are negatively related to species asynchrony, but neither are related to species stability; these links persist under N addition and eCO2. Our study offers insights into the underlying processes that sustain functioning and stability of biodiverse ecosystems in the face of global change.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on June 2, 2027
Mechanistic links between coexistence, productivity, and stability in experimental grasslands
The escalating biodiversity crisis underscores the urgent need for a unified framework that links the mechanisms maintaining biodiversity to its functional consequences. However, studies of species coexistence and biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning have largely progressed independently. Here, using long-term data from five grassland biodiversity experiments, we quantified “coexistence potential” (i.e., the degree to which niche differences exceed fitness differences) and tested its relationships with biodiversity effects on both ecosystem productivity (via complementarity and selection effects) and stability (via species asynchrony and species stability). We found that the relationships within the coexistence–productivity–stability triad were overall positive. These patterns were mechanistically explained by phylogenetic and trait composition: Phylogenetically and functionally more diverse communities supported higher coexistence potential and greater productivity, while those dominated by species with stronger root-mycorrhizal collaboration and larger seeds exhibited enhanced productivity and stability. Our work provides integrative empirical evidence linking biodiversity maintenance to ecosystem functioning, demonstrating that conserving phylogenetically and functionally diverse communities, particularly those including collaborative species, is key to sustaining biodiverse, productive, and stable ecosystems.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2425352
- PAR ID:
- 10697454
- Author(s) / Creator(s):
- ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; more »
- Publisher / Repository:
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Volume:
- 123
- Issue:
- 22
- ISSN:
- 0027-8424
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Summary Decades of studies have demonstrated links between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, yet the generality of the relationships and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear, especially for forest ecosystems.Using 11 tree‐diversity experiments, we tested tree species richness–community productivity relationships and the role of arbuscular (AM) or ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungal‐associated tree species in these relationships.Tree species richness had a positive effect on community productivity across experiments, modified by the diversity of tree mycorrhizal associations. In communities with both AM and ECM trees, species richness showed positive effects on community productivity, which could have resulted from complementarity between AM and ECM trees. Moreover, both AM and ECM trees were more productive in mixed communities with both AM and ECM trees than in communities assembled by their own mycorrhizal type of trees. In communities containing only ECM trees, species richness had a significant positive effect on productivity, whereas species richness did not show any significant effects on productivity in communities containing only AM trees.Our study provides novel explanations for variations in diversity–productivity relationships by suggesting that tree–mycorrhiza interactions can shape productivity in mixed‐species forest ecosystems.more » « less
-
ABSTRACT Although biodiversity is widely recognised for its role in maintaining ecosystem functioning under environmental change, its importance has received relatively little attention in the context of emerging environmental stressors such as nanoparticles. By assembling phytoplankton communities across a gradient of species richness and exposing them to varying concentrations of copper oxide nanoparticles, we experimentally explored how biodiversity modulates ecosystem functioning under nanoparticle exposure. We found that the positive effect of biodiversity on phytoplankton biomass production was amplified at higher nanoparticle concentrations, allowing diverse communities to maintain biomass despite strong inhibitory effects of nanoparticles on monocultures. This enhanced biodiversity effect was primarily driven by increased complementarity, specifically through more frequent facilitative interactions among species under nanoparticle stress. Our findings advance the understanding of how biodiversity preserves ecosystem functioning and underscore its role in mitigating the impacts of emerging anthropogenic stressors.more » « less
-
Abstract Biodiversity can stabilize ecosystem functioning, yet this relationship is often weakened under environmental change such as nutrient enrichment. The mechanisms underlying this weakening remain unclear, particularly whether it arises from shifts in species that consistently contribute to community dynamics or from increased species turnover. Species that persist through time are expected to underpin stability by maintaining species stability and asynchronous dynamics, whereas transient species, characterized by low temporal occupancy, primarily contribute to compositional turnover with limited stabilizing effects. Disentangling the roles of these two groups may therefore explain how nutrient enrichment alters biodiversity–stability relationships.Using data from 49 grasslands with and without fertilization, we partitioned communities into persistent and transient species based on temporal occupancy. We quantified their respective contributions to community temporal stability and evaluated how fertilization altered the relationships between species richness, species asynchrony, species stability and community stability using structural equation models.Community stability was primarily driven by persistent species: communities with more stable and asynchronous persistent species exhibited higher temporal stability. In unfertilized conditions, species richness was positively associated with the stability and asynchrony of persistent species, as well as with the asynchrony between persistent and transient species, which were linked to higher community stability. Under fertilization, these pathways were weakened, as fertilization reduced persistent species stability and persistent–transient asynchrony, resulting in lower community stability. Transient species contributed little to stability in either condition and may obscure biodiversity–stability relationships when not explicitly accounted for.Synthesis. These results indicate that biodiversity–stability relationships are mediated predominantly by species that persist through time, consistent with theoretical expectations that invariability emerges from stable and asynchronous population dynamics. Nutrient enrichment weakens these relationships by disrupting the stabilizing role of persistent species rather than by increasing the contribution of transient species. Accounting for species temporal persistence thus provides a mechanistic basis for predicting how global change alters ecosystem stability.more » « less
-
Abstract To determine which types of plant traits might better explain ecosystem functioning and plant evolutionary histories, we compiled 42 traits for each of 15 perennial species in a biodiversity experiment. We used every possible combination of three traits to cluster species. Across these 11,480 combinations, clusters generated using tissue %Ca, %N and %K best mapped onto phylogeny. Moreover, for the 15 best combinations of three traits, 82% of traits were chemical, 16% morphological and 2% metabolic. The diversity‐dependence of ecosystem productivity was better explained by the %Ca, %N and %K clusters: compared to adding a new species at random, adding a species from an absent cluster/clade better‐explained gains in productivity. Species number impacted productivity only when all clusters were present. Our results suggest that tissue elemental chemistry might be more phylogenetically conserved and more strongly related to ecosystem functioning than commonly measured morphological and physiological traits, a possibility that merits exploration.more » « less
