An official website of the United States government
Abstract Growing evidence suggests that organisms with narrow niche requirements are particularly disadvantaged in small habitat patches, typical of fragmented landscapes. However, the mechanisms behind this relationship remain unclear. Dietary specialists may be particularly constrained by the availability of their food resources as habitat area shrinks. For herbivorous insects, host plants may be filtered out of small habitat fragments by neutral sampling processes and deterministic plant community shifts due to altered microclimates, edge effects and browsing by ungulates.We examined the relationship between forest fragment area and the abundance of dietary‐specialist and dietary‐generalist larval Lepidoptera (caterpillars) and their host plants in the northeastern USA. We surveyed caterpillars and their host plants over 3 years in equal‐sized plots within 32 forest fragments varying in area between 3 and 1014 ha. We tested whether the abundances and species richness of dietary specialists increased more than those of dietary generalists with increasing fragment area and, if so, whether the difference could be explained by reduced host plant availability or increased browsing by white‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus).The overall abundance of dietary specialists was positively related to fragment area; the relationship was substantially weaker for dietary generalists. There was notable variation among species within diet breadth groups, however. There was no effect of fragment area on the diversity of dietary‐specialist or dietary‐generalist caterpillars. Deer activity was not related to the abundances of either dietary‐generalist or dietary‐specialist caterpillars.Plant community composition was strongly associated with fragment area. Larger fragments were more likely to include host plants for both dietary‐specialist and dietary‐generalist caterpillars. Deer activity was correlated with decreased host plant availability for both groups, with a slightly stronger impact on host plants of dietary specialists. Although dietary specialists were more likely to lack host plants in fragments, the relationship between fragment area and host availability did not depend on caterpillar diet breadth.This study provides further evidence that decreasing patch area disproportionately impacts specialist consumers. Because this relationship was derived from equal‐sized plots, it is robust to some criticisms levelled at fragmentation research. The mechanisms for specialist consumer declines, however, remain elusive.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on May 8, 2027
Concentrated vulnerabilities in bees: Diet specialists have smaller geographic ranges
Abstract Wild bees are widely believed to be in decline, yet most species remain unassessed for IUCN extinction risk. Geographic range size is used in risk assessments under the assumption that species with smaller ranges are more vulnerable to anthropogenic impacts. Narrow diet breadth can also increase vulnerability but is not currently incorporated into assessments.Niche breadth theory predicts a positive association between range size and diet breadth, which could concentrate risk among dietary specialists, but this relationship is not well established for bees and may differ among taxa.Here, we combined pollen‐use data from natural history collections with global occurrence records to test the relationship between diet breadth and range size across bees and among bee families. We assigned diet breadth using three metrics (categorical, numerical and phylogenetic) and estimated range size as the extent of occurrence for 633 species from six families.Across bees, range size increased with diet breadth, and diet specialists tended to occupy smaller ranges. These results suggest that range size and diet breadth jointly contribute to increased vulnerability in bees, indicating that some specialist species may merit conservation prioritisation.Our findings support the integration of trait‐based approaches for assessing extinction risk and highlight the high value of natural history data in identifying patterns of vulnerability among pollinators.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2102006
- PAR ID:
- 10698095
- Publisher / Repository:
- Insect Conservation and Diversity
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Insect Conservation and Diversity
- ISSN:
- 1752-458X
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract An animal’s diet breadth is a central aspect of its life history, yet the factors determining why some species have narrow dietary breadths (specialists) and others have broad dietary breadths (generalists) remain poorly understood. This challenge is pronounced in herbivorous insects due to incomplete host plant data across many taxa and regions. Here, we develop and validate machine learning models to predict pollen diet breadth in bees, using a bee phylogeny and occurrence data for 682 bee species native to the United States, aiming to better understand key drivers. We found that pollen specialist bees made an average of 72.9% of their visits to host plants and could be predicted with high accuracy (mean 94%). Our models predicted generalist bee species, which made up a minority of the species in our dataset, with lower accuracy (mean 70%). The models tested on spatially and phylogenetically blocked data revealed that the most informative predictors of diet breadth are plant phylogenetic diversity, bee species’ geographic range, and regional abundance. Our findings also confirm that range size is predictive of diet breadth and that both male and female specialist bees mostly visit their host plants. Overall, our results suggest we can use visitation data to predict specialist bee species in regions and for taxonomic groups where diet breadth is unknown, though predicting generalists may be more challenging. These methods can thus enhance our understanding of plant-pollinator interactions, leading to improved conservation outcomes and a better understanding of the pollination services bees provide.more » « less
-
Whitehead, A (Ed.)Abstract Bees are palynivorous insects that vary widely in the number of plant families from which they collect pollen. Their evolutionary history has been marked by multiple transitions in diet breadth between specialists that only visit specific plant genera (narrow diet breadth) and generalists that visit multiple large plant families (broad diet breadth). Understanding the evolution of sensory systems associated with changes in the detection, discrimination, and gustation of different pollen in bees can shed light on the underlying genetic mechanisms associated with transitions between narrow and broad diet breadths. We conducted a comparative study of three families of insect olfactory receptor genes (odorant receptors (ORs), gustatory receptors (GRs), and ionotropic receptors (IRs)) linked to diet breadth across 51 bee species. We calculated rates of gene gains and losses and identified genes experiencing positive selection across specialist and generalist bees. Our results show that broad generalists exhibit high rates of OR gene losses and GR gene gains. We observed accelerated rates of evolution in seven orthologous groups of genes across specialists and one group in generalists. Several orthogroups showed diversification in putative ligand-binding domains of proteins, indicating potential shifts in functional properties of the receptors. Taken together, these results indicate that dietary specialization in bees requires chemosensory system diversification of existing genes while dietary generalization is associated with the loss of ORs and gain of GRs. Our study provides important insights into the genetic architecture underlying shifts in niche occupancy across insects.more » « less
-
Environmental conditions are dynamic, and plants respond to those dynamics on multiple time scales. Disequilibrium occurs when a response occurs more slowly than the driving environmental changes. We review evidence regarding disequilibrium in plant distributions, including their responses to paleoclimate changes, recent climate change and new species introductions. There is strong evidence that plant species distributions are often in some disequilibrium with their environmental conditions.This disequilibrium poses a challenge when projecting future species distributions using species distribution models (SDMs). Classically, SDMs assume that the set of species occurrences is an unbiased sample of the suitable environmental conditions. However, a species in disequilibrium with the environment may have higher‐than‐expected occurrence probabilities (e.g. due to extinction debts) or lower‐than‐expected occurrence probabilities (e.g. due to dispersal limitation) in different areas. If unaccounted for, this will lead to biased estimates of the environmental suitability.We review methods for avoiding such biases in SDMs, ranging from simple thinning of the occurrence dataset to complex dynamic and process‐based models. Such models require large data inputs, natural history knowledge and technical expertise, so implementing them can be challenging. Despite this, we advocate for their increased use, since process‐based models provide the best potential to account for biases in model training data and to then represent the dynamics of species occupancy as ranges shift.Synthesis. Occurrence records for a species are often in disequilibrium with climate. SDMs trained on such data will produce biased estimates of a species' niche unless this disequilibrium is addressed in the modelling. A range of tools, spanning a wide gradient of complexity and realism, can resolve this bias.more » « less
-
Abstract Harvest of wild organisms is an important component of human culture, economy, and recreation, but can also put species at risk of extinction. Decisions that guide successful management actions therefore rely on the ability of researchers to link changes in demographic processes to the anthropogenic actions or environmental changes that underlie variation in demographic parameters.Ecologists often use population models or maximum sustained yield curves to estimate the impacts of harvest on wildlife and fish populations. Applications of these models usually focus exclusively on the impact of harvest and often fail to consider adequately other potential, often collinear, mechanistic drivers of the observed relationships between harvest and demographic rates. In this study, we used an integrated population model and long‐term data (1973–2016) to examine the relationships among hunting and natural mortality, the number of hunters, habitat conditions, and population size of blue‐winged tealSpatula discors, an abundant North American dabbling duck with a relatively fast‐paced life history strategy.Over the last two and a half decades of the study, teal abundance tripled, hunting mortality probability increased slightly (), and natural mortality probability increased substantially () at greater population densities. We demonstrate strong density‐dependent effects on natural mortality and fecundity as population density increased, indicative of compensatory harvest mortality and compensatory natality. Critically, an analysis that only assessed the relationship between survival and hunting mortality would spuriously indicate depensatory mortality due to multicollinearity between abundance, natural mortality and hunting mortality.Our findings demonstrate that models that only consider the direct effect of hunting on survival or natural mortality can fail to accurately assess the mechanistic impact of hunting on population dynamics due to multicollinearity among demographic drivers. This multicollinearity limits inference and may have strong impacts on applied management actions globally.more » « less
