Attention:The NSF Public Access Repository (PAR) system and access will be unavailable from 5:00 PM ET until 8:00 PM ET on Friday, September 11 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Title: CpHMD Input Files and Supplementary Movies Showing Self-assembly and Bilayer CpHMD Trajectories of Different LNP Formulations at Varying Solution pH
Abstract: General note: a/b/c represent replicas 1, 2, and 3, respectively Movie S1a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-KC2-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 3. Movie S2a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-KC2-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 4. Movie S3a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-KC2-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 5. Movie S4a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-KC2-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 6. Movie S5a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-KC2-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 7. Movie S6a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-KC2-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 8. Movie S7a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-KC2-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 9. Movie S8a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-KC2-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 10. Movie S9a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DODAP LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 3. Movie S10a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DODAP LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 4. Movie S11a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DODAP LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 5. Movie S12a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DODAP LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 6. Movie S13a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DODAP LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 7. Movie S14a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DODAP LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 8. Movie S15a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DODAP LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 9. Movie S16a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DODAP LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 10. Movie S17a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DODMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 3. Movie S18a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DODMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 4. Movie S19a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DODMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 5. Movie S20a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DODMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 6. Movie S21a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DODMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 7. Movie S22a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DODMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 8. Movie S23a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DODMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 9. Movie S24a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DODDMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 10. Movie S25a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 3. Movie S26a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 4. Movie S27a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 5. Movie S28a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 6. Movie S29a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 7. Movie S30a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 8. Movie S31a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 9. Movie S32a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 10. Movie S33a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-MC3-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 3. Movie S34a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-MC3-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 4. Movie S35a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-MC3-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 5. Movie S36a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-MC3-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 6. Movie S37a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-MC3-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 7. Movie S38a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-MC3-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 8. Movie S39a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-MC3-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 9. Movie S40a/b/c. Self-assembly of the DLin-MC3-DMA LNP formulation for 100 ns at pH = 10. Movie S41a/b/c. Simulated pH change of the acidic DODAP structure to pH = 7.4. Movie S42a/b/c. Mixed self-assembly/bilayer simulations of DLin-KC2-DMA for 50 ns at pH = 7, started from the corresponding pH 10 structures, which were equilibrated for 100 ns. Movie S43a/b/c. Mixed self-assembly/bilayer simulation of DLin-KC2-DMA for 50 ns at pH = 8, started from the corresponding pH 10 structure, which was equilibrated for 100 ns. Movie S44a/b/c. Mixed self-assembly/bilayer simulation of DLin-KC2-DMA for 50 ns at pH = 9, started from the corresponding pH 10 structure, which was equilibrated for 100 ns. Movie S45a/b/c. Mixed self-assembly/bilayer simulations of DLin-MC3-DMA for 50 ns at pH = 7, started from the corresponding pH 10 structures, which were equilibrated for 100 ns. Movie S46a/b/c. Mixed self-assembly/bilayer simulation of DLin-MC3-DMA for 50 ns at pH = 8, started from the corresponding pH 10 structure, which was equilibrated for 100 ns. Movie S47a/b/c. Mixed self-assembly/bilayer simulation of DLin-MC3-DMA for 50 ns at pH = 9, started from the corresponding pH 10 structure, which was equilibrated for 100 ns. Movie S48a/b/c. Mixed self-assembly/bilayer simulations of DODMA for 50 ns at pH = 7, started from the corresponding pH 10 structures, which were equilibrated for 100 ns. Movie S49a/b/c. Mixed self-assembly/bilayer simulation of DODMA for 50 ns at pH = 8, started from the corresponding pH 10 structure, which was equilibrated for 100 ns. Movie S50a/b/c. Mixed self-assembly/bilayer simulation of DODMA for 50 ns at pH = 9, started from the corresponding pH 10 structure, which was equilibrated for 100 ns. Movie S51a/b/c. Mixed self-assembly/bilayer simulations of DLin-DMA for 50 ns at pH = 7, started from the corresponding pH 10 structures, which were equilibrated for 100 ns. Movie S52a/b/c. Mixed self-assembly/bilayer simulation of DLin-DMA for 50 ns at pH = 8, started from the corresponding pH 10 structure, which was equilibrated for 100 ns. Movie S53a/b/c. Mixed self-assembly/bilayer simulation of DLin-DMA for 50 ns at pH = 9, started from the corresponding pH 10 structure, which was equilibrated for 100 ns. Movie S54a/b/c. Mixed self-assembly/bilayer simulation of DODAP for 50 ns at pH = 7, started from the corresponding pH 10 structure, which was equilibrated for 100 ns. Movie S55a/b/c. Mixed self-assembly/bilayer simulation of DODAP for 50 ns at pH = 8, started from the corresponding pH 10 structure, which was equilibrated for 100 ns. Movie S56a/b/c. Mixed self-assembly/bilayer simulations of DODAP for 50 ns at pH = 9, started from the corresponding pH 10 structures, which were equilibrated for 100 ns.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2317652
PAR ID:
10700619
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Zenodo
Date Published:
Format(s):
Medium: X
Right(s):
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. The pKa values and associated protonation states of ionizable lipids in lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulations are strongly dependent on their chemical environment. This phenomenon leads to poorly understood structure-function relationships that influence payload delivery, tissue selective biodistribution, and manufacturing. For example, the charge- and biodistribution of an mRNA-loaded LNP can vary based on the type of ionizable lipid used, the molar ratio of its components, and its car-go. Yet, the spatial resolution of experimental protonation-state measurements is currently limited to the apparent charge of an ionizable lipid averaged over all environments/conformations of the LNP — best represented by the apparent pKa value. Such measurements are too coarse to capture the heterogenous charge distributions of ionizable lipids in LNPs, which influ-ence biocorona formation and interactions with the payload. Similar limitations are inherent to classical fixed-protonation-state in silico models that cannot capture the environment-dependent protonation states determining local pKa. To address this gap in experimental and computational tools available to accurately determine the local charge distributions in LNPs, this work now incorporates a scalable continuous constant pH molecular dynamics (CpHMD) model to simulate the self-assembly processes of five reported distinct LNP formulations. Parameters for ionizable lipids were generated from fitting fixed -state calculations performed with Hamiltonian replica exchange (HREX) to improve conformational sampling during parameterization. Simulated systems were composed of 100 ionizable lipids (50 mol%), cholesterol (40 mol%), dis-tearoylphosphatidylcholine (10 mol%), and mRNA (20 nucleotides) to model the interior of an LNP. Self-assembly was simulated for 100 ns at different pH values and integrated with bilayer models for neutral/basic pH conditions to validate the apparent pKa for each system. For our most accurate mixed self-assembly/bilayer model, the theoretically calculated apparent pKa values matched well with the experimental values (mean absolute error (MAE) = 0.32 pKa units (R2 = 0.52), and all systems exhibited pH-dependent structures. Overall, this work provides a new computational platform technology to (i) pre-dict the pKa values of ionizable lipids in different chemical environments and (ii) enable a structure-based way to model the heterogeneous, environment-dependent charge distributions of ionizable lipids in LNP systems typically encountered during LNP manufacturing and delivery. 
    more » « less
  2. The pKa values and associated protonation states of ionizable lipids in lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulations are strongly dependent on their chemical environment. This phenomenon leads to poorly understood structure-function relationships that influence payload delivery, tissue-selective biodistribution, and manufacturing. For example, the charge- and biodistribution of an mRNA-loaded LNP can vary based on the type of ionizable lipid used, the molar ratio of its components, and its cargo. Yet, the spatial resolution of experimental protonation state measurements is currently limited to the apparent charge of an ionizable lipid averaged over all environments/conformations of an LNP — best represented by its apparent pKa value. Such measurements are too coarse to capture the heterogenous charge distributions of ionizable lipids in LNPs, which influence biocorona formation and interactions with the payload. Similar limitations are inherent to classical fixed protonation-state in silico models that cannot capture the environment-dependent protonation states and pKa values determining local pKa. To address this gap in experimental and computational tools available to accurately determine the local charge distributions in LNPs, this work now incorporates a scalable continuous constant pH molecular dynamics (CpHMD) model to simulate the self-assembly processes of five reported distinct LNP formulations. Parameters for ionizable lipids were generated from fitting fixed lambda-state calculations performed with Hamiltonian replica exchange (HREX) to improve conformational sampling during parameterization. Simulated systems were composed of 100 ionizable lipids (50 mol%), cholesterol (40 mol%), distearoylphosphatidylcholine (10 mol%), and mRNA (20 nucleotides) to model the interior of an LNP. Self-assembly was simulated for 100 ns at different pH values to validate the apparent pKa for each system. The theoretically calculated apparent pKa values matched reasonably well with those measured experimentally (mean absolute error = 0.5 pKa units), and all systems exhibited pH-dependent structures. Overall, this work provides a new computational platform technology to (i) predict the pKa values of ionizable lipids in different chemical environments and (ii) enable a structure-based way to model the heterogeneous, environment-dependent charge distributions of ionizable lipids in LNP systems typically encountered during LNP manufacturing and delivery. 
    more » « less
  3. In the last several years, countless developments have been made to engineer more efficient and potent mRNA lipid nanoparticle vaccines, culminating in the rapid development of effective mRNA vaccines against COVID-19. However, despite these advancements and materials approaches, there is still a lack of understanding of the resultant immunogenicity of mRNA lipid nanoparticles. Therefore, a more mechanistic, design-driven approach needs to be taken to determine which biophysical characteristics, especially related to changes in lipid compositions, drive nanoparticle immunogenicity. Here, we synthesized a panel of six mRNA lipid nanoparticle formulations, varying the concentrations of different lipid components and systematically studied their effect on NLRP3 inflammasome activation; a key intracellular protein complex that controls various inflammatory responses. Initial experiments aimed to determine differences in nanoparticle activation of NLRP3 inflammasomes by IL-1β ELISA, which unveiled that nanoparticles with high concentrations of ionizable lipid DLin-MC3-DMA in tandem with high cationic lipid DPTAP and low cholesterol concentration induced the greatest activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. These results were further corroborated by the measurement of ASC specks indicative of NLRP3 complex assembly, as well as cleaved gasdermin-D and caspase-1 expression indicating complex activation. We also uncovered these activation profiles to be mechanistically correlated primarily with lysosomal rupturing caused by the delayed membrane disruption capabilities of ionizable lipids until the lysosomal stage, as well as by mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and calcium influx for some of the particles. Therefore, we report that the specific, combined effects of each lipid type, most notably ionizable, cationic lipids, and cholesterol, is a crucial mRNA lipid nanoparticle characteristic that varies the endo/lysosomal rupture capabilities of the formulation and activate NLRP3 inflammasomes in a lysosomal rupture dependent manner. These results provide a more concrete understanding of mRNA lipid Nanoparticle-Associated Molecular Patterns for the activation of molecular-level immune responses and provide new lipid composition design considerations for future mRNA-delivery approaches. 
    more » « less
  4. Design: Ten grams of tissue were ground under liquid nitrogen with a mortar and pestle and cross-linked by stirring for 10 min in 100 mL ice-cold fixation buffer (15 mM PIPES-NaOH, pH 6.8, 0.32 mM sorbitol, 80 mM KCl, 20 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EGTA, 2mM EDTA, 1mM DTT, 0.15 mM spermine, and 0.5 mM spermidine) containing 1% formaldehyde. Fixation was stopped by adding glycine to 125 mM. Nuclei were isolated by adding Triton X-100 to 1% and stirring for 10 minutes. The suspension was filtered through one layer of Miracloth (Calbiochem) and placed in 50 mL centrifuge tubes. In 50 mL centrifuge tubes, 35 mL nuclear suspensions were underplayed with 15 mL of Percoll cushion composed of 50% Percoll (GE) in BFA. Nuclei suspensions were centrifuged at 3000g for 15 min at 4°C. The nuclei at the Percoll interface were transferred to a 50 mL tube and diluted two-fold with MNase digestion buffer (“MDB”, containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 320 mM sucrose, 4 mM MgCl2, and 1mM CaCl2). Nuclei suspensions were centrifuged at 2000g for 10 minutes at 4°C, and nuclei pellets were resuspended in 2.5 mL MDB. Nuclei were aliquoted into 500 mL aliquots, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C until use. Nuclei were thawed at room temperature, digested by adding MNase to 10U/mL (light) or 100 U/mL (heavy), and incubating at room temperature for 5 minutes. Digestions were stopped with 10 mM EGTA. Nuclei were de-cross-linked by incubating overnight at 65°C in the presence of 10% SDS and 100 ug/mL Proteinase K. DNA was extracted by phenol-chloroform extraction followed by EtOH precipitation. Digested DNA was resuspended in 40 ug/mL RNase A and electrophoresed in a 1% agarose gel. DNA fragments under 200 bp were excised and gel extracted following ethidium bromide staining with the Qiaex II gel extraction kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Following nucleus isolation and digestion, gel-extracted DNA was used to prepare sequencing libraries using the NEBNext® Ultra DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB) using manufacturer instructions. Indexed libraries were pooled and sequenced on 8 Illumina HiSeq 2500 lanes with paired-end 50-cycle sequencing. 
    more » « less
  5. Understanding and manipulating crystallization processes has been an important challenge for solution-processed organic thin films, both for fundamental studies and for fabricating thin films with near-intrinsic charge transport properties. We report an in situ X-ray scattering study of the crystallization of 2-decyl-7-phenyl-[1]benzothieno[3,2- b ][1]benzothiophene (Ph-BTBT-C 10 ) during its deposition from solution. At temperatures modestly below the smectic-E/crystalline phase boundary, the crystallization goes through a transient liquid crystal state before reaching the final stable crystalline phase. Significant dynamics occur in the first few seconds of the transition, which are observed through fluctuations in the X-ray scattering intensity, and are correlated with the time interval that the transient thin film coexists with the evaporating solvent. The transition to the stable crystalline phase takes minutes or even hours under these conditions, which may be a result of the asymmetry of the molecule. Transient phases are of potential interest for applications, since they can act as a route to self-assembly of organic thin films. However, our observations show that the long-lived monolayer-stacked intermediate state does not act as a template for the bilayer-stacked crystalline phase. Rather, the grain structure is replaced through nucleation, where the nucleation free-energy barrier is related to a potential barrier that prevents molecules to flip their long axis by 180°. 
    more » « less