An official website of the United States government
This empirical work-in-progress paper examines the impact of two technology-enhanced learning tools, an interactive visualization with multiple representations and explicit scaffolding and a simulation tool with single representation and implicit scaffolding, on students’ conceptual understanding and affective outcomes in semiconductor physics. This domain is known for early conceptual difficulty that often limits student progression into advanced coursework and the semiconductor workforce. Using a crossover design, 20 undergraduate electrical engineering students engaged with both tools and completed pre and post-assessments of conceptual knowledge, perceived understanding, interest, and motivation. A semi-structured focus group was analyzed using thematic analysis to capture students’ learning experiences. The findings reveal that while both tools supported students' cognitive and affective processes, one primarily fostered foundational understanding for novice learners, whereas the other one enabled deeper exploration for more experienced students. Although limited by sample size and short duration, the results suggest that aligning tool design with learners’ developmental stage may support both learning and motivation. Overall, this study demonstrates how instructional design features shape students’ engagement with complex engineering content and underscores the importance of adaptive technology-enhanced learning environments.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on June 21, 2027
NSF-IUSE: Multiple/Single Representations and Scaffolding Design in Technology-enhanced Semiconductor Learning: A Pilot Crossover Study
This empirical work-in-progress paper examines the impact of two technology-enhanced learning tools, an interactive visualization with multiple representations and explicit scaffolding and a simulation tool with single representation and implicit scaffolding, on students’ conceptual understanding and affective outcomes in semiconductor physics. This domain is known for early conceptual difficulty that often limits student progression into advanced coursework and the semiconductor workforce. Using a crossover design, 20 undergraduate electrical engineering students engaged with both tools and completed pre and post-assessments of conceptual knowledge, perceived understanding, interest, and motivation. A semi-structured focus group was analyzed using thematic analysis to capture students’ learning experiences. The findings reveal that while both tools supported students' cognitive and affective processes, one primarily fostered foundational understanding for novice learners, whereas the other one enabled deeper exploration for more experienced students. Although limited by sample size and short duration, the results suggest that aligning tool design with learners’ developmental stage may support both learning and motivation. Overall, this study demonstrates how instructional design features shape students’ engagement with complex engineering content and underscores the importance of adaptive technology-enhanced learning environments.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10701582
- Publisher / Repository:
- American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE)
- Date Published:
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- simulation, visualization, representation, scaffolding, conceptual, affective
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Engineering technology education often struggles to help students connect abstract energy concepts to authentic design contexts. This study examines the integration of an AI-supported scaffold within a first-year energy-efficiency design challenge. Students used a simulation tool to optimize a solar-powered house affected by tree shading, balancing technical, economic, and environmental constraints. A large language model served as a conversational design counterpart under two conditions: a scaffolded model that prompted evidence-based argumentation and a non-technical model that engaged in open-ended dialogue. Pre- and post-test results indicated significant gains in conceptual knowledge and self-reported decision-making confidence. Student reflections suggested that AI-supported dialogue encouraged clearer justification of design choices and deeper consideration of trade-offs. Rather than isolating specific causal mechanisms, this study characterizes the overall impact of embedding AI-driven scaffolding within simulation-based learning. Findings suggest that structured AI interaction can support reflective reasoning and evidence-based design thinking in early engineering technology education.more » « less
-
Engineering technology education often struggles to help students connect abstract energy concepts to authentic design contexts. This study examines the integration of an AI-supported scaffold within a first-year energy-efficiency design challenge. Students used a simulation tool to optimize a solar-powered house affected by tree shading, balancing technical, economic, and environmental constraints. A large language model served as a conversational design counterpart under two conditions: a scaffolded model that prompted evidence-based argumentation and a non-technical model that engaged in open-ended dialogue. Pre- and post-test results indicated significant gains in conceptual knowledge and self-reported decision-making confidence. Student reflections suggested that AI-supported dialogue encouraged clearer justification of design choices and deeper consideration of trade-offs. Rather than isolating specific causal mechanisms, this study characterizes the overall impact of embedding AI-driven scaffolding within simulation-based learning. Findings suggest that structured AI interaction can support reflective reasoning and evidence-based design thinking in early engineering technology education.more » « less
-
Abstract As the use of computers in education increases, adaptive learning platforms are becoming more common. However, these adaptive systems are typically designed to support acquisition of declarative knowledge and/or procedural fluency but rarely address conceptual learning. In this work, we developed the Crystallography Adaptive Learning Module (CALM) for materials science to provide students a tool for individualized conceptual learning. We used a randomized quasi‐experimental design comparing two instructional designs with different levels of computer‐provided direction and student agency. Undergraduate students were randomly assigned to one of two different instructional designs; one design had students complete an individualized, adaptive path using the CALM (N = 80), and the other gave students the freedom to explore CALM's learning resources but with limited guidance (N = 85). Within these two designs, we also investigated students among different cumulative grade point average (GPA) groups. While there was no statistically significant difference in the measure of conceptual understanding between instructional designs or among the groups with the same GPA, there is evidence to suggest the CALM improves conceptual understanding of students in the middle GPA group. Students using CALM also showed increased participation with the interactive learning videos compared to the other design. The number of videos watched in each instructional condition aligns with overall academic performance as the low GPA group received the most assigned supplements but watched the least videos by choice. This study provides insight for technology developers on how to develop educational adaptive technology systems that provide a proper level of student agency to promote conceptual understanding in challenging STEM topics.more » « less
-
Purpose: The presented study was conducted to unpack high school students’ motivational influences in engineering/computer science project-based learning (PjBL), using the attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction (ARCS) model of motivation as a conceptual framework. Methods: A qualitative research approach was used with student focus groups as the data source. A total of six focus groups with 32 student participants was conducted. The students were enrolled in high schools located in four different states in the U.S. The qualitative analysis of transcripts was performed using first and second cycle coding methods. Findings: The findings show that student motivation is nuanced in regard with attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction. The findings identify research-based strategies for fostering student motivation, such as implementing learner-focused scaffolding in PjBL environments, improving the relevance of the classroom content with the real-world context that students have experiences in or are knowledgeable about, and focusing on stimulating intrinsic motivation in addition to extrinsic rewards. Conclusion: The findings provide support for the comprehensibility and utility of the ARCS model of motivation in high school engineering/CS education, and more importantly empirically unpacks what the model factors mean from students’ perspective. Practitioners may use these findings to inform the design, development, and implementation of PjBL in high school settings.more » « less
