Inferring gene regulatory networks (GRNs) from single-cell gene expression datasets is a challenging task. Existing methods are often designed heuristically for specific datasets and lack the flexibility to incorporate additional information or compare against other algorithms. Further, current GRN inference methods do not provide uncertainty estimates with respect to the interactions that they predict, making inferred networks challenging to interpret. To overcome these challenges, we introduce Probabilistic Matrix Factorization for Gene Regulatory Network inference (PMF-GRN). PMF-GRN uses single-cell gene expression data to learn latent factors representing transcription factor activity as well as regulatory relationships between transcription factors and their target genes. This approach incorporates available experimental evidence into prior distributions over latent factors and scales well to single-cell gene expression datasets. By utilizing variational inference, we facilitate hyperparameter search for principled model selection and direct comparison to other generative models. To assess the accuracy of our method, we evaluate PMF-GRN using the model organisms Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Bacillus subtilis, benchmarking against database-derived gold standard interactions. We discover that, on average, PMF-GRN infers GRNs more accurately than current state-of-the-art single-cell GRN inference methods. Moreover, our PMF-GRN approach offers well-calibrated uncertainty estimates, as it performs gene regulatory network (GRN) inference in a probabilistic setting. These estimates are valuable for validation purposes, particularly when validated interactions are limited or a gold standard is incomplete.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on January 16, 2027
Bayesian Inference of Gene Regulatory Networks at Stochastic Steady State
Gene Regulatory Networks (GRNs) form the regulatory back- bone that coordinates gene expression. The architecture of GRNs shapes their function and constraints the biochemi- cal pathways through which information flows. Inferring the structure of regulatory interactions is thus essential for un- derstanding biological systems, and designing targeted ther- apies. Despite substantial progress in GRN inference, most approaches – from statistical methods to deep learning – do not take into account fundamental biochemical processes that drive regulatory dynamics. To address this shortcoming, here we present a novel Bayesian inference approach based on us- ing the Chemical Langevin Equation (CLE) as a model of gene expression dynamics at stochastic equilibrium. Inter- actions in GRNs are sparse, and we thus use a regularized horseshoe prior enabling selective shrinkage of unsupported interactions while identifying strong regulatory edges. We evaluate our method using synthetic gene expression data, allowing for benchmarking against a known ground truth. Our approach allows us to infer kinetic parameters, identify net- work structure, and infer regulatory cycles without the need to observe transient dynamics. This Bayesian alternative to current methods thus provides both biological interpretability and structural identifiability in GRN inference.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2451529
- PAR ID:
- 10706146
- Publisher / Repository:
- BioRxiv
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of the Royal Society interface
- ISSN:
- 1742-5662
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Martelli, Pier Luigi (Ed.)Cell function is regulated by gene regulatory networks (GRNs) defined by protein-mediated interaction between constituent genes. Despite advances in experimental techniques, we can still measure only a fraction of the processes that govern GRN dynamics. To infer the properties of GRNs using partial observation, unobserved sequential processes can be replaced with distributed time delays, yielding non-Markovian models. Inference methods based on the resulting model suffer from the curse of dimensionality. Results: We develop a simulation-based Bayesian MCMC method employing an approximate likelihood for the efficient and accurate inference of GRN parameters when only some of their products are observed. We illustrate our approach using a two-step activation model: an activation signal leads to the accumulation of an unobserved regulatory protein, which triggers the expression of observed fluorescent proteins. With prior information about observed fluorescent protein synthesis, our method successfully infers the dynamics of the unobserved regulatory protein. We can estimate the delay and kinetic parameters characterizing target regulation including transcription, translation, and target searching of an unobserved protein from experimental measurements of the products of its target gene. Our method is scalable and can be used to analyze non-Markovian models with hidden components.Availability and implementation:Our code is implemented in R and is freely available with a simple example data at https://github.com/Mathbiomed/SimMCMC.more » « less
-
Abstract Motivation Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) in a cell provide the tight feedback needed to synchronize cell actions. However, genes in a cell also take input from, and provide signals to other neighboring cells. These cell–cell interactions (CCIs) and the GRNs deeply influence each other. Many computational methods have been developed for GRN inference in cells. More recently, methods were proposed to infer CCIs using single cell gene expression data with or without cell spatial location information. However, in reality, the two processes do not exist in isolation and are subject to spatial constraints. Despite this rationale, no methods currently exist to infer GRNs and CCIs using the same model. Results We propose CLARIFY, a tool that takes GRNs as input, uses them and spatially resolved gene expression data to infer CCIs, while simultaneously outputting refined cell-specific GRNs. CLARIFY uses a novel multi-level graph autoencoder, which mimics cellular networks at a higher level and cell-specific GRNs at a deeper level. We applied CLARIFY to two real spatial transcriptomic datasets, one using seqFISH and the other using MERFISH, and also tested on simulated datasets from scMultiSim. We compared the quality of predicted GRNs and CCIs with state-of-the-art baseline methods that inferred either only GRNs or only CCIs. The results show that CLARIFY consistently outperforms the baseline in terms of commonly used evaluation metrics. Our results point to the importance of co-inference of CCIs and GRNs and to the use of layered graph neural networks as an inference tool for biological networks. Availability and implementation The source code and data is available at https://github.com/MihirBafna/CLARIFY.more » « less
-
Accurately inferring gene regulatory networks (GRNs) from single‐cell RNA sequencing (scRNA‐seq) data is critical for understanding cellular dynamics in both normal development and disease. However, existing computational methods often suffer from low precision and high false‐positive rates due to the intrinsic noise and complex regulatory architecture in scRNA‐seq data. We introduce scTIGER2.0, a deep‐learning‐based framework that integrates expression correlation, pseudotime ordering, temporal causal discovery, and bootstrap‐based significance testing to infer high‐confidence, directional gene–gene interactions. Benchmarking against five popular GRN inference methods using large‐scale datasets, scTIGER2.0 consistently achieved superior specificity, especially in linear developmental trajectories. In real applications, scTIGER2.0 identified an APOE‐centered GRN from Alzheimer's disease scRNA‐seq data and uncovered interconnected GRNs for FOS, FOXP1, JUN, KLF6, NCOA4, and RUNX1 from acute myeloid leukemia data, where 87.5% of the predicted targets show promoter‐binding peaks in the corresponding ChIP‐seq data. These results demonstrate that scTIGER2.0 is a robust, accurate and fully integrated platform for uncovering biologically meaningful GRNs from noisy scRNA‐seq data.more » « less
-
Benos, Panayiotis (Ed.)Abstract The inference of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) from high-throughput data constitutes a fundamental and challenging task in systems biology. Boolean networks are a popular modeling framework to understand the dynamic nature of GRNs. In the absence of reliable methods to infer the regulatory logic of Boolean GRN models, researchers frequently assume threshold logic as a default. Using the largest repository of published expert-curated Boolean GRN models as best proxy of reality, we systematically compare the ability of two popular threshold formalisms, the Ising and the 01 formalism, to truthfully recover biological functions and biological system dynamics. While Ising rules match fewer biological functions exactly than 01 rules, they yield a better average agreement. In general, more complex regulatory logic proves harder to be represented by either threshold formalism. Informed by these results and a meta-analysis of regulatory logic, we propose modified versions for both formalisms, which provide a better function-level and dynamic agreement with biological GRN models than the usual threshold formalisms. For small biological GRN models with low connectivity, corresponding threshold networks exhibit similar dynamics. However, they generally fail to recover the dynamics of large networks or highly connected networks. In conclusion, this study provides new insights into an important question in computational systems biology: how truthfully do Boolean threshold networks capture the dynamics of GRNs?more » « less
An official website of the United States government
