%AMcDermott, Timothy [Center for Magnetoencephalography University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) Omaha Nebraska]%AWiesman, Alex [Center for Magnetoencephalography University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) Omaha Nebraska, Department of Neurological Sciences UNMC Omaha Nebraska]%AMills, Mackenzie [Center for Magnetoencephalography University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) Omaha Nebraska]%ASpooner, Rachel [Center for Magnetoencephalography University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) Omaha Nebraska, Department of Neurological Sciences UNMC Omaha Nebraska]%ACoolidge, Nathan [Center for Magnetoencephalography University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) Omaha Nebraska, Department of Psychology University of Nebraska Omaha Nebraska]%AProskovec, Amy [Center for Magnetoencephalography University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) Omaha Nebraska, Department of Psychology University of Nebraska Omaha Nebraska]%AHeinrichs‐Graham, Elizabeth [Center for Magnetoencephalography University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) Omaha Nebraska, Department of Neurological Sciences UNMC Omaha Nebraska]%AWilson, Tony [Center for Magnetoencephalography University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) Omaha Nebraska, Department of Neurological Sciences UNMC Omaha Nebraska]%BJournal Name: Human Brain Mapping; Journal Volume: 40; Journal Issue: 3; Related Information: CHORUS Timestamp: 2023-09-08 08:43:56 %D2018%IWiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons) %JJournal Name: Human Brain Mapping; Journal Volume: 40; Journal Issue: 3; Related Information: CHORUS Timestamp: 2023-09-08 08:43:56 %K %MOSTI ID: 10078330 %PMedium: X %TtDCS modulates behavioral performance and the neural oscillatory dynamics serving visual selective attention %XAbstract

Transcranial direct‐current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive method for modulating human brain activity. Although there are several hypotheses about the net effects of tDCS on brain function, the field's understanding remains incomplete and this is especially true for neural oscillatory activity during cognitive task performance. In this study, we examined whether different polarities of occipital tDCS differentially alter flanker task performance and the underlying neural dynamics. To this end, 48 healthy adults underwent 20 min of anodal, cathodal, or sham occipital tDCS, and then completed a visual flanker task during high‐density magnetoencephalography (MEG). The resulting oscillatory responses were imaged in the time‐frequency domain using beamforming, and the effects of tDCS on task‐related oscillations and spontaneous neural activity were assessed. The results indicated that anodal tDCS of the occipital cortices inhibited flanker task performance as measured by reaction time, elevated spontaneous activity in the theta (4–7 Hz) and alpha (9–14 Hz) bands in prefrontal and occipital cortices, respectively, and reduced task‐related theta oscillatory activity in prefrontal cortices during task performance. Cathodal tDCS of the occipital cortices did not significantly affect behavior or any of these neuronal parameters in any brain region. Lastly, the power of theta oscillations in the prefrontal cortices was inversely correlated with reaction time. In conclusion, anodal tDCS modulated task‐related oscillations and spontaneous activity across multiple cortical areas, both near the electrode and in distant sites that were putatively connected to the targeted regions.

%0Journal Article