%AReistad, J. [Birkeland Centre for Space Science University of Bergen Bergen Norway]%ALaundal, K. [Birkeland Centre for Space Science University of Bergen Bergen Norway]%AØstgaard, N. [Birkeland Centre for Space Science University of Bergen Bergen Norway]%AOhma, A. [Birkeland Centre for Space Science University of Bergen Bergen Norway]%ABurrell, A. [Space Science Division U.S. Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC USA]%AHatch, S. [Birkeland Centre for Space Science University of Bergen Bergen Norway]%AHaaland, S. [Birkeland Centre for Space Science University of Bergen Bergen Norway, Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research Göttingen Germany, The University Centre in Svalbard Longyearbyen Svalbard]%AThomas, E. [Thayer School of Engineering Dartmouth College Hanover NH USA]%BJournal Name: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics; Journal Volume: 126; Journal Issue: 11; Related Information: CHORUS Timestamp: 2023-08-28 03:00:48 %D2021%IDOI PREFIX: 10.1029 %JJournal Name: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics; Journal Volume: 126; Journal Issue: 11; Related Information: CHORUS Timestamp: 2023-08-28 03:00:48 %K %MOSTI ID: 10361673 %PMedium: X %TQuantifying the Lobe Reconnection Rate During Dominant IMF B y Periods and Different Dipole Tilt Orientations %XAbstract

Lobe reconnection is usually thought to play an important role in geospace dynamics only when the Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) is mainly northward. This is because the most common and unambiguous signature of lobe reconnection is the strong sunward convection in the polar cap ionosphere observed during these conditions. During more typical conditions, when the IMF is mainly oriented in a dawn‐dusk direction, plasma flows initiated by dayside and lobe reconnection both map to high‐latitude ionospheric locations in close proximity to each other on the dayside. This makes the distinction of the source of the observed dayside polar cap convection ambiguous, as the flow magnitude and direction are similar from the two topologically different source regions. We here overcome this challenge by normalizing the ionospheric convection observed by the Super Dual Aurora Radar Network (SuperDARN) to the polar cap boundary, inferred from simultaneous observations from the Active Magnetosphere and Planetary Electrodynamics Response Experiment (AMPERE). This new method enable us to separate and quantify the relative contribution of both lobe reconnection and dayside/nightside (Dungey cycle) reconnection during periods of dominating IMFBy. Our main findings are twofold. First, the lobe reconnection rate can typically account for 20% of the Dungey cycle flux transport during local summer when IMFByis dominating and IMFBz ≥ 0. Second, the dayside convection relative to the open/closed boundary is vastly different in local summer versus local winter, as defined by the dipole tilt angle.

%0Journal Article