%AYik, Brandon%ARaker, Jeffrey%AApkarian, Naneh%AStains, Marilyne%AHenderson, Charles%ADancy, Melissa%AJohnson, Estrella%BJournal Name: Frontiers in Education; Journal Volume: 7 %D2022%I %JJournal Name: Frontiers in Education; Journal Volume: 7 %K %MOSTI ID: 10382086 %PMedium: X %TAssociation of malleable factors with adoption of research-based instructional strategies in introductory chemistry, mathematics, and physics %XActive learning pedagogies are shown to enhance the outcomes of students, particularly in disciplines known for high attrition rates. Despite the demonstrated benefits of active learning, didactic lecture continues to predominate in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses. Change agents and professional development programs have historically placed emphasis on develop–disseminate efforts for the adoption of research-based instructional strategies (RBIS). With numerous reported barriers and motivators for trying out and adopting active learning, it is unclear to what extent these factors are associated with adoption of RBIS and the effectiveness of change strategies. We present the results of a large-scale, survey-based study of introductory chemistry, mathematics, and physics instructors and their courses in the United States. Herein, we evaluate the association of 17 malleable factors with the tryout and adoption of RBIS. Multilevel logistic regression analyses suggest that several contextual, personal, and teacher thinking factors are associated with different stages of RBIS adoption. These results are also compared with analogous results evaluating the association of these factors with instructors’ time spent lecturing. We offer actionable implications for change agents to provide targeted professional development programming and for institutional leaders to influence the adoption of active learning pedagogies in introductory STEM courses. %0Journal Article