%ACole, Courtney%AO’Connell, Abigail%AGong, Zibing%AJablokow, Kathryn%AMohammad, Susan%ARitter, Sarah%AHeininger, Katie%AMarhefka, Jacqueline%AMiller, Scarlett%BJournal Name: Journal of Mechanical Design; Journal Volume: 144; Journal Issue: 12 %D2022%I %JJournal Name: Journal of Mechanical Design; Journal Volume: 144; Journal Issue: 12 %K %MOSTI ID: 10383406 %PMedium: X %TWhat Factors Impact Psychological Safety in Engineering Student Teams? A Mixed-Method Longitudinal Investigation %XAbstract Although teamwork is being integrated throughout engineering education because of the perceived benefits of teams, the construct of psychological safety has been largely ignored in engineering research. This omission is unfortunate because psychological safety reflects collective perceptions about how comfortable team members feel in sharing their perspectives, and it has been found to positively impact team performance in samples outside of engineering. While prior research has indicated that psychological safety is positively related to team performance and outcomes, research related to psychological safety in engineering teams is less established. There is also a lack of comprehensive methodologies that capture the dynamic changes that occur throughout the design process and at each time point. In light of this, the goal of the current study was to understand how psychological safety might be measured practically and reliably in engineering student teams over time. In addition, we sought to identify factors that impact the building and waning of psychological safety in these teams over time. This was accomplished through a study with 260 engineering students in 68 teams in a first-year engineering design class. The psychological safety of the teams was captured for each team over five time points over the course of a semester long design project. The results of this study provide some of the first evidence on the reliability of psychological safety in engineering teams and offer insights as to how to support and improve psychological safety. %0Journal Article