%AMartin, Scott [Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA, Ohio Biodiversity Conservation Partnership The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA]%APeterman, William [Ohio Biodiversity Conservation Partnership The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA, School of Environmental and Natural Resources The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA]%ALipps, Jr., Gregory [Ohio Biodiversity Conservation Partnership The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA]%AGibbs, H. [Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA, Ohio Biodiversity Conservation Partnership The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA]%BJournal Name: Ecological Applications; Journal Volume: 33; Journal Issue: 2; Related Information: CHORUS Timestamp: 2023-08-17 10:07:16 %D2023%IWiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons) %JJournal Name: Ecological Applications; Journal Volume: 33; Journal Issue: 2; Related Information: CHORUS Timestamp: 2023-08-17 10:07:16 %K %MOSTI ID: 10390329 %PMedium: X %TInferring population connectivity in eastern m assasauga rattlesnakes ( S istrurus c atenatus ) using landscape genetics %XAbstract

Assessing the environmental factors that influence the ability of a threatened species to move through a landscape can be used to identify conservation actions that connect isolated populations. However, direct observations of species' movement are often limited, making the development of alternate approaches necessary. Here we use landscape genetic analyses to assess the impact of landscape features on the movement of individuals between local populations of a threatened snake, the eastern massasauga rattlesnake (Sistrurus catenatus). We linked connectivity data with habitat information from two landscapes of similar size: a large region of unfragmented habitat and a previously studied fragmented landscape consisting of isolated patches of habitat. We used this analysis to identify features of the landscape where modification or acquisition would enhance population connectivity in the fragmented region. We found evidence that current connectivity was impacted by both contemporary land‐cover features, especially roads, and inherent landscape features such as elevation. Next, we derived estimates of expected movement ability using a recently developed pedigree‐based approach and least‐cost paths through the unfragmented landscape. We then used our pedigree and resistance map to estimate resistance polygons of the potential extent forS. catenatusmovement in the fragmented landscape. These polygons identify possible sites for future corridors connecting currently isolated populations in this landscape by linking the impact of future habitat modification or land acquisition to dispersal ability in this species. Overall, our study shows how modeling landscape resistance across differently fragmented landscapes can identify habitat features that affect contemporary movement in threatened species in fragmented landscapes and how this information can be used to guide mitigation actions whose goal is to connect isolated populations.

%0Journal Article