<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><records count="1" morepages="false" start="1" end="1"><record rownumber="1"><dc:product_type>Journal Article</dc:product_type><dc:title>The Need for Social Ethics in Interdisciplinary Environmental Science Graduate Programs: Results from a Nation-Wide Survey in the United States</dc:title><dc:creator>Hall, Troy E.; Engebretson, Jesse; O’Rourke, Michael; Piso, Zach; Whyte, Kyle; Valles, Sean</dc:creator><dc:corporate_author/><dc:editor/><dc:description>Professionals in environmental fields engage with complex problems
that involve stakeholders with different values, different forms of knowledge, and
contentious decisions. There is increasing recognition of the need to train graduate
students in interdisciplinary environmental science programs (IESPs) in these
issues, which we refer to as ‘‘social ethics.’’ A literature review revealed topics and
skills that should be included in such training, as well as potential challenges and
barriers. From this review, we developed an online survey, which we administered
to faculty from 81 United States colleges and universities offering IESPs (480
surveys were completed). Respondents overwhelmingly agreed that IESPs should
address values in applying science to policy and management decisions. They also
agreed that programs should engage students with issues related to norms of scientific
practice. Agreement was slightly less strong that IESPs should train students
in skills related to managing value conflicts among different stakeholders. The
primary challenges to incorporating social ethics into the curriculum were related to
the lack of materials and expertise for delivery, though challenges such as ethics
being marginalized in relation to environmental science content were also prominent.
Challenges related to students’ interest in ethics were considered less problematic.
Respondents believed that social ethics are most effectively delivered when
incorporated into existing courses, and they preferred case studies or problem-based
learning for delivery. Student competence is generally not assessed, and respondents
recognized a need for both curricular materials and assessment tools.</dc:description><dc:publisher/><dc:date>2016-03-30</dc:date><dc:nsf_par_id>10018872</dc:nsf_par_id><dc:journal_name>Science and Engineering Ethics</dc:journal_name><dc:journal_volume/><dc:journal_issue/><dc:page_range_or_elocation/><dc:issn>1353-3452</dc:issn><dc:isbn/><dc:doi>https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9775-0</dc:doi><dcq:identifierAwardId>1338614</dcq:identifierAwardId><dc:subject/><dc:version_number/><dc:location/><dc:rights/><dc:institution/><dc:sponsoring_org>National Science Foundation</dc:sponsoring_org></record></records></rdf:RDF>