<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><records count="1" morepages="false" start="1" end="1"><record rownumber="1"><dc:product_type>Journal Article</dc:product_type><dc:title>Large-scale invasion of western Atlantic mesophotic reefs by lionfish potentially undermines culling-based management</dc:title><dc:creator>Andradi-Brown, Dominic A.; Vermeij, Mark J.; Slattery, Marc; Lesser, Michael; Bejarano, Ivonne; Appeldoorn, Richard; Goodbody-Gringley, Gretchen; Chequer, Alex D.; Pitt, Joanna M.; Eddy, Corey; Smith, Struan R.; Brokovich, Eran; Pinheiro, Hudson T.; Jessup, M. Elliott; Shepherd, Bart; Rocha, Luiz A.; Curtis-Quick, Jocelyn; Eyal, Gal; Noyes, Timothy J.; Rogers, Alex D.; Exton, Dan A.</dc:creator><dc:corporate_author/><dc:editor/><dc:description>The detrimental effects of invasive lionfishes
(Pterois volitans and Pterois miles) on western
Atlantic shallow reefs are well documented, including
declines in coral cover and native fish populations,
with disproportionate predation on critically endangered
reef fish in some locations. Yet despite individuals
reaching depths[100 m, the role of mesophotic
coral ecosystems (MCEs; reefs 30–150 m) in lionfish
ecology has not been addressed. With lionfish control
programs in most invaded locations limited to 30 mby
diving restrictions, understanding the role of MCEs in
lionfish distributions remains a critical knowledge gap
potentially hindering conservation management. Here
we synthesise unpublished and previously published
studies of lionfish abundance and body length at paired
shallow reef (0–30 m) and MCE sites in 63 locations
in seven western Atlantic countries and eight sites in
three Indo-Pacific countries where lionfish are native.
Lionfish were found at similar abundances across the
depth gradient from shallow to adjacent MCEs, with
no difference between invaded and native sites. Of the
five invaded countries where length data were available
three had larger lionfish on mesophotic than
shallow reefs, one showed no significant difference,
while the fifth represented a recently invaded site. This
suggests at least some mesophotic populations may
represent extensions of natural ontogenetic migrations.
Interestingly, despite their shallow focus, in
many cases culling programs did not appear to alter
abundance between depths. In general, we identify
widespread invasive lionfish populations on MCE that
could be responsible for maintaining high densities of
lionfish recruits despite local shallow-biased control
programs. This study highlights the need for management
plans to incorporate lionfish populations below
the depth limit of recreational diving in order to
address all aspects of the local population and
maximise the effectiveness of control efforts.</dc:description><dc:publisher/><dc:date>2017-01-01</dc:date><dc:nsf_par_id>10059880</dc:nsf_par_id><dc:journal_name>Biological invasions</dc:journal_name><dc:journal_volume>19</dc:journal_volume><dc:journal_issue>3</dc:journal_issue><dc:page_range_or_elocation>939-954</dc:page_range_or_elocation><dc:issn>1387-3547</dc:issn><dc:isbn/><dc:doi>https://doi.org/DOI 10.1007/s10530-016-1358-0</dc:doi><dcq:identifierAwardId>1632348</dcq:identifierAwardId><dc:subject/><dc:version_number/><dc:location/><dc:rights/><dc:institution/><dc:sponsoring_org>National Science Foundation</dc:sponsoring_org></record></records></rdf:RDF>