<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><records count="1" morepages="false" start="1" end="1"><record rownumber="1"><dc:product_type>Journal Article</dc:product_type><dc:title>Functional innovation promotes diversification of form in the evolution of an ultrafast trap-jaw mechanism in ants</dc:title><dc:creator>Booher, Douglas B.; Gibson, Joshua C.; Liu, Cong; Longino, John T.; Fisher, Brian L.; Janda, Milan; Narula, Nitish; Toulkeridou, Evropi; Mikheyev, Alexander S.; Suarez, Andrew V.; Economo, Evan P.</dc:creator><dc:corporate_author/><dc:editor>Khila, Abderrahman</dc:editor><dc:description>Evolutionary innovations underlie the rise of diversity and complexity—the 2 long-term trends in the history of life. How does natural selection redesign multiple interacting parts to achieve a new emergent function? We investigated the evolution of a biomechanical innovation, the latch-spring mechanism of trap-jaw ants, to address 2 outstanding evolutionary problems: how form and function change in a system during the evolution of new complex traits, and whether such innovations and the diversity they beget are repeatable in time and space. Using a new phylogenetic reconstruction of 470 species, and X-ray microtomography and high-speed videography of representative taxa, we found the trap-jaw mechanism evolved independently 7 to 10 times in a single ant genus (              Strumigenys              ), resulting in the repeated evolution of diverse forms on different continents. The trap mechanism facilitates a 6 to 7 order of magnitude greater mandible acceleration relative to simpler ancestors, currently the fastest recorded acceleration of a resettable animal movement. We found that most morphological diversification occurred after evolution of latch-spring mechanisms, which evolved via minor realignments of mouthpart structures. This finding, whereby incremental changes in form lead to a change of function, followed by large morphological reorganization around the new function, provides a model for understanding the evolution of complex biomechanical traits, as well as insights into why such innovations often happen repeatedly.</dc:description><dc:publisher/><dc:date>2021-03-02</dc:date><dc:nsf_par_id>10283278</dc:nsf_par_id><dc:journal_name>PLOS Biology</dc:journal_name><dc:journal_volume>19</dc:journal_volume><dc:journal_issue>3</dc:journal_issue><dc:page_range_or_elocation>e3001031</dc:page_range_or_elocation><dc:issn>1545-7885</dc:issn><dc:isbn/><dc:doi>https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001031</dc:doi><dcq:identifierAwardId>1755336; 1932405; 1655076</dcq:identifierAwardId><dc:subject/><dc:version_number/><dc:location/><dc:rights/><dc:institution/><dc:sponsoring_org>National Science Foundation</dc:sponsoring_org></record></records></rdf:RDF>