<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><records count="1" morepages="false" start="1" end="1"><record rownumber="1"><dc:product_type>Journal Article</dc:product_type><dc:title>COVID-19 and documentary linguistics: Some ways forward</dc:title><dc:creator>Williams, Nicholas; Silva, Wilson D.; W. D. L. Silva, McPherson; Good, Jeff</dc:creator><dc:corporate_author/><dc:editor/><dc:description>In the wake of widespread and ongoing travel restrictions that began in early
2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many documentary linguists worldwide
shifted to remote work methods in order to continue or, in some cases, begin
new projects. This pandemic situation has prompted questions about both
methodological and ethical considerations in doing remote fieldwork. In this
paper, we discuss the pros and cons of working remotely and discuss ways of
working remotely based on our experiences working on projects in West
Africa, northwest Amazonia, and Indonesia. We argue that elements of remote
fieldwork should become a permanent part of linguistic fieldwork, but that
such methods need to be considered in the context of decolonizing language
documentation and centering the community’s needs and interests.</dc:description><dc:publisher/><dc:date>2021-01-01</dc:date><dc:nsf_par_id>10315985</dc:nsf_par_id><dc:journal_name>Language documentation and description</dc:journal_name><dc:journal_volume>20</dc:journal_volume><dc:journal_issue/><dc:page_range_or_elocation/><dc:issn>2756-1224</dc:issn><dc:isbn/><dc:doi>https://doi.org/</dc:doi><dcq:identifierAwardId>1664348</dcq:identifierAwardId><dc:subject/><dc:version_number/><dc:location/><dc:rights/><dc:institution/><dc:sponsoring_org>National Science Foundation</dc:sponsoring_org></record></records></rdf:RDF>