<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><records count="1" morepages="false" start="1" end="1"><record rownumber="1"><dc:product_type>Conference Paper</dc:product_type><dc:title>Abstracts for assessments: Describing a summary statement.</dc:title><dc:creator>Bostic, Jonathan.; Krupa, Erin</dc:creator><dc:corporate_author/><dc:editor>Olanoff, D.; Johnson, K.; Spitzer, S.</dc:editor><dc:description>Quantitative assessment development is a challenging process. The ways in which an assessment might be used, as well as how its score can be interpreted should be clear to intended users. This manuscript provides a discussion about important and useful elements that should be provided by assessment developers. In turn, this information can foster greater usability and portability of quantitative assessments, which can support scholarship focusing on a specific issue.</dc:description><dc:publisher/><dc:date>2021-10-01</dc:date><dc:nsf_par_id>10332431</dc:nsf_par_id><dc:journal_name>Psychology of Mathematics Education North America</dc:journal_name><dc:journal_volume/><dc:journal_issue/><dc:page_range_or_elocation>1854-1858</dc:page_range_or_elocation><dc:issn/><dc:isbn/><dc:doi>https://doi.org/</dc:doi><dcq:identifierAwardId>1920621</dcq:identifierAwardId><dc:subject/><dc:version_number/><dc:location/><dc:rights/><dc:institution/><dc:sponsoring_org>National Science Foundation</dc:sponsoring_org></record></records></rdf:RDF>