<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><records count="1" morepages="false" start="1" end="1"><record rownumber="1"><dc:product_type>Journal Article</dc:product_type><dc:title>Effects of post oak (Quercus stellata) and smooth brome (Bromus inermis) competition on water uptake and root partitioning of eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana)</dc:title><dc:creator>Hamati, Samia; Medeiros, Juliana S.; Ward, David</dc:creator><dc:corporate_author/><dc:editor>Guo, Xiao</dc:editor><dc:description>Eastern redcedar              Juniperus virginiana              is encroaching into new habitats, which will affect native ecosystems as this species competes with other plants for available resources, including water. We designed a greenhouse experiment to investigate changes in soil moisture content and rooting depths of two-year-old              J              .              virginiana              saplings growing with or without competition. We had four competition treatments: 1) none, 2) with a native tree (              Quercus stellata              ), 3) with an invasive grass (              Bromus inermis              ), and 4) with both              Q              .              stellata              and              B              .              inermis              . We measured soil moisture content over two years as well as root length, total biomass, relative water content, midday water potential, and mortality at the end of the experiment. When              J              .              virginiana              and              B              .              inermis              grew together, water depletion occurred at both 30–40 cm and 10–20 cm. Combined with root length results, we can infer that              J              .              virginiana              most likely took up water from the deeper layers whereas              B              .              inermis              used water from the top layers. We found a similar pattern of water depletion and uptake when              J              .              virginiana              grew with              Q              .              stellata              , indicating that              J              .              virginiana              took up water from the deeper layers and              Q              .              stellata              used water mostly from the top soil layers. When the three species grew together, we found root overlap between              J              .              virginiana              and              Q              .              stellata              . Despite the root overlap, our relative water content and water potential indicate that              J              .              virginiana              was not water stressed in any of the plant combinations. Regardless,              J              .              virginiana              saplings had less total biomass in treatments with              B              .              inermis              and we recorded a significantly higher mortality when              J              .              virginiana              grew with both competitors. Root overlap and partitioning can affect how              J              .              virginiana              perform and adapt to new competitors and can allow their co-existence with grasses and other woody species, which can facilitate              J              .              virginiana              encroachment into grasslands and woodlands. Our data also show that competition with both              Q              .              stellata              and              B              .              inermis              could limit establishment, regardless of water availability.</dc:description><dc:publisher/><dc:date>2023-02-01</dc:date><dc:nsf_par_id>10412175</dc:nsf_par_id><dc:journal_name>PLOS ONE</dc:journal_name><dc:journal_volume>18</dc:journal_volume><dc:journal_issue>2</dc:journal_issue><dc:page_range_or_elocation>e0280100</dc:page_range_or_elocation><dc:issn>1932-6203</dc:issn><dc:isbn/><dc:doi>https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280100</dc:doi><dcq:identifierAwardId>1915908</dcq:identifierAwardId><dc:subject/><dc:version_number/><dc:location/><dc:rights/><dc:institution/><dc:sponsoring_org>National Science Foundation</dc:sponsoring_org></record></records></rdf:RDF>