<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><records count="1" morepages="false" start="1" end="1"><record rownumber="1"><dc:product_type>Journal Article</dc:product_type><dc:title>SN 2019zrk, a bright SN 2009ip analog with a precursor</dc:title><dc:creator>Fransson, Claes; Sollerman, Jesper; Strotjohann, Nora L.; Yang, Sheng; Schulze, Steve; Barbarino, Cristina; Kool, Erik C.; Ofek, Eran O.; Crellin-Quick, Arien; De, Kishalay; Drake, Andrew J.; Fremling, Christoffer; Gal-Yam, Avishay; Ho, Anna Y.; Kasliwal, Mansi M.</dc:creator><dc:corporate_author/><dc:editor/><dc:description>We present photometric and spectroscopic observations of the Type IIn supernova SN 2019zrk (also known as ZTF 20aacbyec). The SN shows a &gt; 100 day precursor, with a slow rise, followed by a rapid rise to              M               ≈ −19.2 in the              r              and              g              bands. The post-peak light-curve decline is well fit with an exponential decay with a timescale of ∼39 days, but it shows prominent undulations, with an amplitude of ∼1 mag. Both the light curve and spectra are dominated by an interaction with a dense circumstellar medium (CSM), probably from previous mass ejections. The spectra evolve from a scattering-dominated Type IIn spectrum to a spectrum with strong P-Cygni absorptions. The expansion velocity is high, ∼16 000 km s              −1              , even in the last spectra. The last spectrum ∼110 days after the main eruption reveals no evidence for advanced nucleosynthesis. From analysis of the spectra and light curves, we estimate the mass-loss rate to be ∼4 × 10              −2                             M              ⊙              yr              −1              for a CSM velocity of 100 km s              −1              , and a CSM mass of 1               M              ⊙              . We find strong similarities for both the precursor, general light curve, and spectral evolution with SN 2009ip and similar SNe, although SN 2019zrk displays a brighter peak magnitude. Different scenarios for the nature of the 09ip-class of SNe, based on pulsational pair instability eruptions, wave heating, and mergers, are discussed.</dc:description><dc:publisher/><dc:date>2022-10-01</dc:date><dc:nsf_par_id>10423984</dc:nsf_par_id><dc:journal_name>Astronomy &amp; Astrophysics</dc:journal_name><dc:journal_volume>666</dc:journal_volume><dc:journal_issue/><dc:page_range_or_elocation>A79</dc:page_range_or_elocation><dc:issn>0004-6361</dc:issn><dc:isbn/><dc:doi>https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243452</dc:doi><dcq:identifierAwardId>2034437</dcq:identifierAwardId><dc:subject/><dc:version_number/><dc:location/><dc:rights/><dc:institution/><dc:sponsoring_org>National Science Foundation</dc:sponsoring_org></record></records></rdf:RDF>