<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><records count="1" morepages="false" start="1" end="1"><record rownumber="1"><dc:product_type>Journal Article</dc:product_type><dc:title>Living in the ‘Blue Zone’ of a sea-level rise inundation map: Community perceptions of coastal flooding in King Salmon, California</dc:title><dc:creator>Richmond, Laurie; Kunkel, Kristina</dc:creator><dc:corporate_author/><dc:editor/><dc:description>As sea-level rise (SLR) inundation maps proliferate, it is important to study their politics – both
how they are created and how they act upon and shape various lives and places. This paper uses
the example of King Salmon, CA – a rural, low-income residential area projected to be one of the
most at risk to SLR on the US West Coast – to examine how a community responds to external
projections showing SLR risk to their homes and businesses. Through interviews with 17 King
Salmon community members and observation of a county-hosted ‘communities at risk’ workshop,
we examined the community’s social context, their past experiences with flooding, and their
reaction to SLR projection maps including what next steps they would like to see taken. Residents
expressed a strong connection to the place, noting that it is one of the few affordable places to live
on the coast in California. We found that residents already live with regular flooding during larger
tides of the year and have taken steps to adapt. We observed a strong generational component in
responses to projection maps with many older respondents believing or hoping that the worst
effects from SLR would not come until after they passed away. Residents expressed a lack of faith
in government to address flooding concerns both at present and into the future, noting that
general maintenance issues have gone unaddressed for decades. Many residents interviewed and
observed seemed open or at least resigned to the possibility of relocation at a future undetermined
time. This work reveals the power dynamics inherent in climate projections like SLR maps, which,
due to their technical nature and mobility, can leave communities out of conversations related to
potential futures. Findings also have implications related to climate and SLR work – highlighting
the importance of understanding community context; contributing to equity considerations about
how wealth and other demographic factors shape how communities interact with SLR planning;
and spotlighting the need for sustained learning, engagement, and co-production with communities
in the ‘blue zones’ of SLR inundation maps.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher><dc:date>2024-01-01</dc:date><dc:nsf_par_id>10521773</dc:nsf_par_id><dc:journal_name>Climate Risk Management</dc:journal_name><dc:journal_volume>44</dc:journal_volume><dc:journal_issue>C</dc:journal_issue><dc:page_range_or_elocation>100596</dc:page_range_or_elocation><dc:issn>2212-0963</dc:issn><dc:isbn/><dc:doi>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2024.100596</dc:doi><dcq:identifierAwardId>2103713</dcq:identifierAwardId><dc:subject/><dc:version_number/><dc:location/><dc:rights/><dc:institution/><dc:sponsoring_org>National Science Foundation</dc:sponsoring_org></record></records></rdf:RDF>