<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><records count="1" morepages="false" start="1" end="1"><record rownumber="1"><dc:product_type>Journal Article</dc:product_type><dc:title>The Pledging Puzzle: How Can Revocable Promises Increase Charitable Giving?</dc:title><dc:creator>Andreoni, James; Serra-Garcia, Marta</dc:creator><dc:corporate_author/><dc:editor/><dc:description>What is the value of pledges if they are often reneged upon? In this paper, we show—both theoretically and experimentally—that pledges can be used to screen donors and to better understand their motives for giving. In return, nonprofit managers can use the information they glean from pledges to better target future charitable giving appeals and interventions to donors, such as expressions of gratitude. In an experiment, we find that offering the option to pledge gifts induces self-selection. If expressions of gratitude are then targeted to individuals who select into pledges, reneging can be significantly reduced. Our findings provide an explanation for the potential usefulness of pledges.</dc:description><dc:publisher>informs.</dc:publisher><dc:date>2021-10-01</dc:date><dc:nsf_par_id>10522383</dc:nsf_par_id><dc:journal_name>Management Science</dc:journal_name><dc:journal_volume>67</dc:journal_volume><dc:journal_issue>10</dc:journal_issue><dc:page_range_or_elocation>6198 to 6210</dc:page_range_or_elocation><dc:issn>0025-1909</dc:issn><dc:isbn/><dc:doi>https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3811</dc:doi><dcq:identifierAwardId>1658952</dcq:identifierAwardId><dc:subject/><dc:version_number/><dc:location/><dc:rights/><dc:institution/><dc:sponsoring_org>National Science Foundation</dc:sponsoring_org></record></records></rdf:RDF>