<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><records count="1" morepages="false" start="1" end="1"><record rownumber="1"><dc:product_type>Journal Article</dc:product_type><dc:title>Elevating Corporate Profits Over Individual Liberty: Comparing AI Trade Secret Privilege in Criminal Proceedings with Patent Litigation.</dc:title><dc:creator>Michaels, Andrew C</dc:creator><dc:corporate_author/><dc:editor/><dc:description>This essay compares the claims of trade secret privilege in criminal proceedings asserted by the creators of AI systems with the assertions of such privilege in patent infringement discovery. This comparison reveals that, in the case of patent infringement, courts have generally limited such privilege assertions. This essay argues that the case for discovery in the criminal context should be stronger, rather than weaker, in the criminal context.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Joe Christenson, Inc</dc:publisher><dc:date>2024-02-14</dc:date><dc:nsf_par_id>10545299</dc:nsf_par_id><dc:journal_name>Houston law review</dc:journal_name><dc:journal_volume/><dc:journal_issue/><dc:page_range_or_elocation/><dc:issn>0018-6694</dc:issn><dc:isbn/><dc:doi>https://doi.org/</dc:doi><dcq:identifierAwardId>2131504</dcq:identifierAwardId><dc:subject/><dc:version_number/><dc:location/><dc:rights/><dc:institution/><dc:sponsoring_org>National Science Foundation</dc:sponsoring_org></record></records></rdf:RDF>