<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><records count="1" morepages="false" start="1" end="1"><record rownumber="1"><dc:product_type>Workshop Report</dc:product_type><dc:title>Health Compliance Through a Transparent Supply Chain</dc:title><dc:creator>Wijesekera, Primal</dc:creator><dc:corporate_author/><dc:editor/><dc:description>Privacy regimes are increasingly taking center stage for bringing up cases against violators or introducing new
regulations to safeguard consumer rights. Health regulations mostly predate most of the generic privacy regulations. However, we still see how health entities fail to meet regulatory requirements. Prior work suggests that third-party code is responsible for a significant portion of these violations. Hence, we propose using Software Bills of Materials (SBOM) as an effective intervention for communicating compliance limitations and expectations surrounding third-party code to help developers make informed decisions.</dc:description><dc:publisher>IEEE Workshop on Technology and Consumer Protection (ConPro ’24)</dc:publisher><dc:date>2024-05-23</dc:date><dc:nsf_par_id>10545904</dc:nsf_par_id><dc:journal_name/><dc:journal_volume/><dc:journal_issue/><dc:page_range_or_elocation/><dc:issn/><dc:isbn/><dc:doi>https://doi.org/</dc:doi><dcq:identifierAwardId>2217771</dcq:identifierAwardId><dc:subject/><dc:version_number/><dc:location/><dc:rights/><dc:institution/><dc:sponsoring_org>National Science Foundation</dc:sponsoring_org></record></records></rdf:RDF>