<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><records count="1" morepages="false" start="1" end="1"><record rownumber="1"><dc:product_type>Journal Article</dc:product_type><dc:title>The debiased Near-Earth object population from ATLAS telescopes</dc:title><dc:creator>Deienno, Rogerio; Denneau, Larry; Nesvorný, David; Vokrouhlický, David; Bottke, William F; Jedicke, Robert; Naidu, Shantanu; Chesley, Steven R; Farnocchia, Davide; Chodas, Paul W</dc:creator><dc:corporate_author>NA</dc:corporate_author><dc:editor>NA</dc:editor><dc:description>This work is dedicated to debias the Near-Earth Object (NEO) population based on observations from the
Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) telescopes. We have applied similar methods used to
develop the recently released NEO model generator (NEOMOD), once debiasing the NEO population using
data from Catalina Sky Survey (CSS) G96 telescope. ATLAS is composed of four different telescopes. We
first analyzed observational data from each of all four telescopes separately and later combined them. Our
results highlight main differences between CSS and ATLAS, e.g., sky coverage and survey power at debiasing
the NEO population. ATLAS has a much larger sky coverage than CSS, allowing it to find bright NEOs that
would be constantly ‘‘hiding’’ from CSS. Consequently, ATLAS is more powerful than CSS at debiasing the NEO
population for H ≲ 19. With its intrinsically greater sensitivity and emphasis on observing near opposition, CSS
excels in the debiasing of smaller objects. ATLAS, as an all sky survey designed to find imminent hazardous
objects, necessarily spends a significant fraction of time looking at places on the sky where objects do not
appear, reducing its power for debiasing the population of small objects. We estimate a NEO population
completeness of ≈ 88%+3%
−2% for H &lt; 17.75 and ≈ 36%+1%
−1% for H &lt; 22.25. Those numbers are similar to previous
estimates (within error bars for H &lt; 17.75) from CSS, yet, around 3% and 8% smaller at their face values,
respectively. We also confirm previous finding that the &#120584;6
secular resonance is the main source of small and
faint NEOs at H = 28, whereas the 3:1 mean motion resonance with Jupiter dominates for larger and brighter
NEOs at H = 15.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher><dc:date>2025-01-01</dc:date><dc:nsf_par_id>10554129</dc:nsf_par_id><dc:journal_name>Icarus</dc:journal_name><dc:journal_volume>425</dc:journal_volume><dc:journal_issue>C</dc:journal_issue><dc:page_range_or_elocation>116316</dc:page_range_or_elocation><dc:issn>0019-1035</dc:issn><dc:isbn/><dc:doi>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116316</dc:doi><dcq:identifierAwardId>2009775</dcq:identifierAwardId><dc:subject/><dc:version_number/><dc:location/><dc:rights/><dc:institution/><dc:sponsoring_org>National Science Foundation</dc:sponsoring_org></record></records></rdf:RDF>