<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><records count="1" morepages="false" start="1" end="1"><record rownumber="1"><dc:product_type>Conference Paper</dc:product_type><dc:title>Intercultural Readiness: Mapping Effective Teamwork Strategies in Engineering Teams to the Intercultural Development Continuum</dc:title><dc:creator>Chhikara, Alankrita; Lapka, Samantha; Jesiek, Brent K; Kung, Franki_Y H</dc:creator><dc:corporate_author/><dc:editor/><dc:description>This research paper explores the experiences of
engineering students and professionals in multicultural teams,
aiming to understand successful strategies for working in such
environments. With the engineering field diversifying rapidly due
to globalization, there is a growing need for engineers to possess
cross-cultural communication and collaboration skills alongside
technical knowledge. This study aims to improve the effectiveness
of engineering education and addresses the evolving needs for
engineering education and the role of educators in preparing
future engineers for multicultural teamwork. The following
research questions guided our study: (i). What strategies do
engineering students and professionals hold and employ in
navigating multicultural teamwork?, and (ii) How do these specific
strategies mentioned by engineering students and professionals
align with the developmental orientations on the Intercultural
Developmental Continuum (IDC)? The study employed a
qualitative approach, with interviews and focus groups conducted
with 41 engineering students and 17 professionals who reported
prior experience working on multicultural teams. Participants
discussed their experiences and strategies, which were categorized
into social behavioral, cognitive, and affective attitudinal themes.
A total of 17 strategy types were identified in the student data and
16 types in the professional data. Strategies were in turn mapped
to different developmental orientations on the IDC, showing a
relationship between strategies described by participants and
associated stages of intercultural development. Our findings
reveal likely gaps in multicultural teamwork abilities among both
students and professionals. More specifically, engineering students
and professionals may benefit from expanded intercultural
development training to foster more ethnorelative approaches to
teamwork. Future research could involve participants completing
the IDI survey before interviews to better understand their
individual levels of intercultural development, followed by efforts
to design and pilot training and educational materials aligned with
particular intercultural development levels. This research
contributes to understanding successful strategies for working in
multicultural teams, benefiting educators, practitioners, and
engineering students alike.</dc:description><dc:publisher>IEEE</dc:publisher><dc:date>2024-10-13</dc:date><dc:nsf_par_id>10577800</dc:nsf_par_id><dc:journal_name/><dc:journal_volume/><dc:journal_issue/><dc:page_range_or_elocation>1 to 9</dc:page_range_or_elocation><dc:issn/><dc:isbn>979-8-3503-5150-7</dc:isbn><dc:doi>https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE61694.2024.10892844</dc:doi><dcq:identifierAwardId>2044390</dcq:identifierAwardId><dc:subject/><dc:version_number/><dc:location>Washington, DC, USA</dc:location><dc:rights/><dc:institution/><dc:sponsoring_org>National Science Foundation</dc:sponsoring_org></record></records></rdf:RDF>