<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><records count="1" morepages="false" start="1" end="1"><record rownumber="1"><dc:product_type>Journal Article</dc:product_type><dc:title>A Vertically Resolved Canopy Improves Chemical Transport Model Predictions of Ozone Deposition to North Temperate Forests</dc:title><dc:creator>Vermeuel, Michael P; Millet, Dylan B; Farmer, Delphine K; Ganzeveld, Laurens N; Visser, Auke J; Alwe, Hariprasad D; Bertram, Timothy H; Cleary, Patricia A; Desai, Ankur R; Helmig, Detlev; Kavassalis, Sarah C; Link, Michael F; Pothier, Matson A; Riches, Mj; Wang, Wei; Williams, Sara</dc:creator><dc:corporate_author/><dc:editor/><dc:description>&lt;title&gt;Abstract&lt;/title&gt; &lt;p&gt;Dry deposition is the second largest tropospheric ozone (O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;) sink and occurs through stomatal and nonstomatal pathways. Current O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;uptake predictions are limited by the simplistic big‐leaf schemes commonly used in chemical transport models (CTMs) to parameterize deposition. Such schemes fail to reproduce observed O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;fluxes over terrestrial ecosystems, highlighting the need for more realistic treatment of surface‐atmosphere exchange in CTMs. We address this need by linking a resolved canopy model (1D Multi‐Layer Canopy CHemistry and Exchange Model, MLC‐CHEM) to the GEOS‐Chem CTM and use this new framework to simulate O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;fluxes over three north temperate forests. We compare results with in situ measurements from four field studies and with standalone, observationally constrained MLC‐CHEM runs to test current knowledge of O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;deposition and its drivers. We show that GEOS‐Chem overpredicts observed O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;fluxes across all four studies by up to 2×, whereas the resolved‐canopy models capture observed diel profiles of O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;deposition and in‐canopy concentrations to within 10%. Relative humidity and solar irradiance are strong O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;flux drivers over these forests, and uncertainties in those fields provide the largest remaining source of model deposition biases. Flux partitioning analysis shows that: (a) nonstomatal loss accounts for 60% of O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;deposition on average; (b) in‐canopy chemistry makes only a small contribution to total O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;fluxes; and (c) the CTM big‐leaf treatment overestimates O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;‐driven stomatal loss and plant phytotoxicity in these temperate forests by up to 7×. Results motivate the application of fully online vertically explicit canopy schemes in CTMs for improved O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;predictions.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>AGU</dc:publisher><dc:date>2024-12-28</dc:date><dc:nsf_par_id>10618739</dc:nsf_par_id><dc:journal_name>Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres</dc:journal_name><dc:journal_volume>129</dc:journal_volume><dc:journal_issue>24</dc:journal_issue><dc:page_range_or_elocation/><dc:issn>2169-897X</dc:issn><dc:isbn/><dc:doi>https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042092</dc:doi><dcq:identifierAwardId>2313772; 1822420</dcq:identifierAwardId><dc:subject/><dc:version_number/><dc:location/><dc:rights/><dc:institution/><dc:sponsoring_org>National Science Foundation</dc:sponsoring_org></record></records></rdf:RDF>