<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><records count="1" morepages="false" start="1" end="1"><record rownumber="1"><dc:product_type>Journal Article</dc:product_type><dc:title>Global Lake Evaporation Estimates by Integrating Penman Method with Equilibrium Temperature Approach</dc:title><dc:creator>Farooq, Umar; Liu, Heping; Zhang, Qianyu; Wang, Jingfeng; Shen, Lian</dc:creator><dc:corporate_author/><dc:editor/><dc:description>&lt;title&gt;Abstract&lt;/title&gt; &lt;p&gt;Modeling evaporation&lt;italic&gt;E&lt;/italic&gt;from inland water bodies is challenging largely due to the uncertainties of input data, particularly surface water temperature that plays a key role in the available energy, i.e., net radiation&lt;italic&gt;R&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/italic&gt;minus rate of water heat storage change&lt;italic&gt;G&lt;/italic&gt;. The equilibrium temperature approach (ETA) for estimating water surface temperature offers an alternative method to calculate&lt;italic&gt;R&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/italic&gt;and&lt;italic&gt;G&lt;/italic&gt;using standard meteorological data. This study evaluates the global lake&lt;italic&gt;E&lt;/italic&gt;estimates from the widely used Penman model (PM) coupled with the ETA (PM-ETA) against field observations and model simulations from the Lake, Ice, Snow, and Sediment Simulator (LISSS). Our analysis reveals that the PM-ETA tends to overestimate&lt;italic&gt;E&lt;/italic&gt;by approximately 36% and 24% compared to observations and the LISSS simulations, respectively, despite being driven by the same input data. The biases of the PM-ETA&lt;italic&gt;E&lt;/italic&gt;are more pronounced in the cold and polar regions with distinct seasonality of&lt;italic&gt;R&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/italic&gt;and&lt;italic&gt;G&lt;/italic&gt;. Furthermore, the&lt;italic&gt;E&lt;/italic&gt;trends from the PM-ETA deviate from the LISSS simulations over the period of 2001–16 due to the bias trends in the available energy. By incorporating the LISSS-simulated&lt;italic&gt;R&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/italic&gt;and&lt;italic&gt;G&lt;/italic&gt;into the PM, the bias in&lt;italic&gt;E&lt;/italic&gt;is reduced to less than ±5% compared to the LISSS results. This study highlights the need to improve the available energy input of the PM to improve the estimates of global lake&lt;italic&gt;E&lt;/italic&gt;for better water resource management and planning.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;sec&gt;&lt;title&gt;Significance Statement&lt;/title&gt;&lt;p&gt;This study addresses a crucial challenge in modeling evaporation&lt;italic&gt;E&lt;/italic&gt;from inland water bodies—uncertainties in surface water temperature and available energy inputs, particularly net radiation&lt;italic&gt;R&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/italic&gt;and rate of heat storage change&lt;italic&gt;G&lt;/italic&gt;. By evaluating the widely used Penman model (PM) coupled with the equilibrium temperature approach (ETA), we reveal a tendency for the PM-ETA to overestimate&lt;italic&gt;E&lt;/italic&gt;globally, with the largest biases observed in cold and polar regions. Incorporating higher-quality&lt;italic&gt;R&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/italic&gt;and&lt;italic&gt;G&lt;/italic&gt;estimates from the Lake, Ice, Snow, and Sediment Simulator (LISSS) significantly reduces these biases. These findings highlight the importance of alternative higher-quality data products for available energy inputs for improving&lt;italic&gt;E&lt;/italic&gt;estimates by the PM.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/sec&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>American Meteorological Society</dc:publisher><dc:date>2025-09-15</dc:date><dc:nsf_par_id>10636037</dc:nsf_par_id><dc:journal_name>Journal of Hydrometeorology</dc:journal_name><dc:journal_volume>26</dc:journal_volume><dc:journal_issue>9</dc:journal_issue><dc:page_range_or_elocation>1301 to 1313</dc:page_range_or_elocation><dc:issn>1525-755X</dc:issn><dc:isbn/><dc:doi>https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-24-0146.1</dc:doi><dcq:identifierAwardId>2006281; 2003076</dcq:identifierAwardId><dc:subject/><dc:version_number/><dc:location/><dc:rights/><dc:institution/><dc:sponsoring_org>National Science Foundation</dc:sponsoring_org></record></records></rdf:RDF>