<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><records count="1" morepages="false" start="1" end="1"><record rownumber="1"><dc:product_type>Conference Paper</dc:product_type><dc:title>Identifying and Categorizing Instructor Considerations for Active Learning Implementation</dc:title><dc:creator>Brucati, B; Hearne, L; Weber, K; Johnson, E; Fukawa-Connelly, T</dc:creator><dc:corporate_author/><dc:editor>Cook, S; Katz, B; Melhuish, K</dc:editor><dc:description>In this paper, we discuss our experience collaborating with mathematicians to increase their use of active learning pedagogy in a proof-based linear algebra course. We use this experience to attend to three primary research objectives. First, we identifi ed three primary categories of instructor considerations that would determine whether or not they would incorporate a proposed strategy. Second, we observed and made sense of which of these were most prominent for these mathematicians. Third, we determined what combination of considerations needed to be satisfi ed to warrant the implementation of a strategy by these mathematicians.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education</dc:publisher><dc:date>2025-07-28</dc:date><dc:nsf_par_id>10636741</dc:nsf_par_id><dc:journal_name/><dc:journal_volume/><dc:journal_issue/><dc:page_range_or_elocation/><dc:issn>2474-9346</dc:issn><dc:isbn/><dc:doi>https://doi.org/</dc:doi><dcq:identifierAwardId>2315058</dcq:identifierAwardId><dc:subject/><dc:version_number/><dc:location/><dc:rights/><dc:institution/><dc:sponsoring_org>National Science Foundation</dc:sponsoring_org></record></records></rdf:RDF>