<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><records count="1" morepages="false" start="1" end="1"><record rownumber="1"><dc:product_type>Journal Article</dc:product_type><dc:title>Exploring Secondary Electrostatic Interactions Using Molecular Rotors: Implications for SN2 Reactions</dc:title><dc:creator>Lin, Binzhou [Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of South Carolina  Columbia SC 29205 USA]; Liu, Hao [Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of South Carolina  Columbia SC 29205 USA]; Huang, Xiaolong [Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of South Carolina  Columbia SC 29205 USA]; Scott, Harrison M [Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of South Carolina  Columbia SC 29205 USA]; Pellechia, Perry J [Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of South Carolina  Columbia SC 29205 USA]; Shimizu, Ken D [Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of South Carolina  Columbia SC 29205 USA]</dc:creator><dc:corporate_author/><dc:editor/><dc:description>&lt;title&gt;Abstract&lt;/title&gt; &lt;p&gt;Benzylic and allylic electrophiles are well known to react faster in S&lt;sub&gt;N&lt;/sub&gt;2 reactions than aliphatic electrophiles, but the origins of this enhanced reactivity are still being debated. Galabov, Wu, and Allen recently proposed that electrostatic interactions in the transition state between the nucleophile (Nu) and the sp&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;carbon (C2) adjacent to the electrophilic carbon (C1) play a key role. To test this secondary electrostatic hypothesis, molecular rotors were designed that form similar through‐space electrostatic interactions with C2 in their bond rotation transition states without forming bonds to C1. This largely eliminates the alternative explanation of stabilizing conjugation effects between C1 and C2 in the transition state. The rotor barriers were strongly correlated with the experimentally measured S&lt;sub&gt;N&lt;/sub&gt;2 free energy. Notably, rotors where C2 was sp&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;or sp‐hybridized had barriers that were consistently 0.5–2.0 kcal mol&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;lower than those for rotors where C2 was sp&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;‐hybridized. Computational studies of atomic charges were consistent with the formation of stabilizing secondary electrostatic interactions. Further confirmation came from observing the benzylic effect in rotors where the first atom was varied, including oxygen, sulfur, nitrogen, and sp&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;‐carbon. In summary, these studies provided strong experimental support for the role of secondary electrostatic interactions in the S&lt;sub&gt;N&lt;/sub&gt;2 reaction.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Wiley</dc:publisher><dc:date>2025-05-26</dc:date><dc:nsf_par_id>10645563</dc:nsf_par_id><dc:journal_name>Angewandte Chemie International Edition</dc:journal_name><dc:journal_volume>64</dc:journal_volume><dc:journal_issue>22</dc:journal_issue><dc:page_range_or_elocation/><dc:issn>1433-7851</dc:issn><dc:isbn/><dc:doi>https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202505483</dc:doi><dcq:identifierAwardId>2304777; 2003889</dcq:identifierAwardId><dc:subject/><dc:version_number/><dc:location/><dc:rights/><dc:institution/><dc:sponsoring_org>National Science Foundation</dc:sponsoring_org></record></records></rdf:RDF>