<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><records count="1" morepages="false" start="1" end="1"><record rownumber="1"><dc:product_type>Journal Article</dc:product_type><dc:title>Genetic and environmental influences on the distributions of three chromosomal drive haplotypes in maize</dc:title><dc:creator>Brady, MJ; Dawe, RK</dc:creator><dc:corporate_author/><dc:editor/><dc:description>Meiotic drive elements are regions of the genome that are transmitted to progeny
at frequencies that exceed Mendelian expectations, often to the detriment of the
organism. In maize there are three prevalent chromosomal drive elements known
as Abnormal chromosome 10 (Ab10), K10L2, and the B chromosome. There has
been much speculation about how these drivers might interact with each other and
the environment in traditional maize landraces and their teosinte ancestors. Here
we used genotype-by-sequencing data to score more than 10,000 maize and teosinte
lines for the presence or absence of each driver. Fewer than ~0.5% of modern
inbred lines carry chromosomal drivers. In contrast, among individuals from 5331
open-pollinated landraces, 6.32% carried Ab10, 5.16% carried K10L2, and 12.28%
carried at least one B chromosome. These frequencies are consistent with those
reported in previous studies. Using a GWAS approach we identified unlinked loci
that associate with the presence or absence of the selfish genetic elements. Many
significant SNPs are positively associated with the drivers, suggesting that there may
have been selection for alleles that ameliorate their negative fitness consequences.
We then assessed the contributions of population structure, associated loci, and the
environment on the distribution of each chromosomal driver. There was no significant
relationship between any chromosomal driver and altitude, contrary to conclusions
based on smaller studies. Our data suggest that the distribution of the major chromosomal
drivers is primarily influenced by neutral processes and the deleterious fitness
consequences of the drivers themselves. While each driver has a unique relationship
to genetic background and the environment, they are largely unconstrained by either.</dc:description><dc:publisher>PLOS Genetics</dc:publisher><dc:date>2025-07-06</dc:date><dc:nsf_par_id>10661354</dc:nsf_par_id><dc:journal_name>PLOS genetics</dc:journal_name><dc:journal_volume/><dc:journal_issue/><dc:page_range_or_elocation/><dc:issn>1553-7390</dc:issn><dc:isbn/><dc:doi>https://doi.org/</dc:doi><dcq:identifierAwardId>1925546</dcq:identifierAwardId><dc:subject/><dc:version_number/><dc:location/><dc:rights/><dc:institution/><dc:sponsoring_org>National Science Foundation</dc:sponsoring_org></record></records></rdf:RDF>