<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><records count="1" morepages="false" start="1" end="1"><record rownumber="1"><dc:product_type>Journal Article</dc:product_type><dc:title>Microphysics of Circumgalactic Turbulence Probed by Fast Radio Bursts and Quasars</dc:title><dc:creator>Ocker, Stella Koch (ORCID:0000000249415333); Chen, Mandy C (ORCID:0000000287393163); Oh, S Peng (ORCID:0000000210134657); Sharma, Prateek (ORCID:0000000326354643)</dc:creator><dc:corporate_author/><dc:editor/><dc:description>&lt;title&gt;Abstract&lt;/title&gt; &lt;p&gt;The circumgalactic medium (CGM) is poorly constrained at the subparsec scales relevant to turbulent energy dissipation and regulation of multiphase structure. Fast radio bursts are sensitive to small-scale plasma density fluctuations, which can induce multipath propagation (scattering). The amount of scattering depends on the density fluctuation spectrum, including its amplitude&lt;inline-formula&gt;&lt;tex-math&gt;&lt;CDATA/&gt;&lt;/tex-math&gt;&lt;math overflow='scroll'&gt;&lt;msubsup&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mi&gt;C&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mi mathvariant='normal'&gt;n&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mn&gt;2&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;/msubsup&gt;&lt;/math&gt;&lt;/inline-formula&gt;, spectral index&lt;italic&gt;β&lt;/italic&gt;, and dissipation scale&lt;italic&gt;l&lt;/italic&gt;&lt;sub&gt;i&lt;/sub&gt;. We use quasar observations of CGM turbulence at ≳pc scales to infer&lt;inline-formula&gt;&lt;tex-math&gt;&lt;CDATA/&gt;&lt;/tex-math&gt;&lt;math overflow='scroll'&gt;&lt;msubsup&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mi&gt;C&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mi mathvariant='normal'&gt;n&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mn&gt;2&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;/msubsup&gt;&lt;/math&gt;&lt;/inline-formula&gt;, finding it to be&lt;inline-formula&gt;&lt;tex-math&gt;&lt;CDATA/&gt;&lt;/tex-math&gt;&lt;math overflow='scroll'&gt;&lt;mn&gt;1&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;msup&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mn&gt;0&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mo&gt;−&lt;/mo&gt;&lt;mn&gt;16&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;/msup&gt;&lt;mo&gt;≲&lt;/mo&gt;&lt;msubsup&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mi&gt;C&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mi mathvariant='normal'&gt;n&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mn&gt;2&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;/msubsup&gt;&lt;mo&gt;≲&lt;/mo&gt;&lt;mn&gt;1&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;msup&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mn&gt;0&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mo&gt;−&lt;/mo&gt;&lt;mn&gt;9&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;/msup&gt;&lt;/math&gt;&lt;/inline-formula&gt;m&lt;sup&gt;−20/3&lt;/sup&gt;for hot (&lt;italic&gt;T&lt;/italic&gt;&gt; 10&lt;sup&gt;6&lt;/sup&gt;K) gas and&lt;inline-formula&gt;&lt;tex-math&gt;&lt;CDATA/&gt;&lt;/tex-math&gt;&lt;math overflow='scroll'&gt;&lt;mn&gt;1&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;msup&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mn&gt;0&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mo&gt;−&lt;/mo&gt;&lt;mn&gt;8&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;/msup&gt;&lt;mo&gt;≲&lt;/mo&gt;&lt;msubsup&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mi&gt;C&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mi mathvariant='normal'&gt;n&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mn&gt;2&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;/msubsup&gt;&lt;mo&gt;≲&lt;/mo&gt;&lt;mn&gt;1&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;msup&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mn&gt;0&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mo&gt;−&lt;/mo&gt;&lt;mn&gt;4&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;/msup&gt;&lt;/math&gt;&lt;/inline-formula&gt;m&lt;sup&gt;−20/3&lt;/sup&gt;for cool (10&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;≲&lt;italic&gt;T&lt;/italic&gt;≲ 10&lt;sup&gt;5&lt;/sup&gt;K) gas, depending on the gas sound speed and density. These values of&lt;inline-formula&gt;&lt;tex-math&gt;&lt;CDATA/&gt;&lt;/tex-math&gt;&lt;math overflow='scroll'&gt;&lt;msubsup&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mi&gt;C&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mi mathvariant='normal'&gt;n&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mn&gt;2&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;/msubsup&gt;&lt;/math&gt;&lt;/inline-formula&gt;are much smaller than those inferred in the interstellar medium at similar physical scales. The resulting scattering delays from the hot CGM are negligible (≪1&lt;italic&gt;μ&lt;/italic&gt;s at 1 GHz), but they are more detectable from the cool gas as either radio pulse broadening or scintillation, depending on the observing frequency and sightline geometry. Joint quasar-FRB observations of individual galaxies can yield lower limits on&lt;italic&gt;l&lt;/italic&gt;&lt;sub&gt;i&lt;/sub&gt;, even if the CGM is not a significant scattering site. An initial comparison between quasar and FRB observations (albeit for different systems) suggests&lt;italic&gt;l&lt;/italic&gt;&lt;sub&gt;i&lt;/sub&gt;≳ 750 km in ∼10&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;K gas in order for the quasar and FRB constraints to be consistent. If a foreground CGM is completely ruled out as a source of scattering along an FRB sightline, then&lt;italic&gt;l&lt;/italic&gt;&lt;sub&gt;i&lt;/sub&gt;may be comparable to the smallest cloud sizes (≲pc) inferred from photoionization modeling of quasar absorption lines.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>ApJ</dc:publisher><dc:date>2025-07-15</dc:date><dc:nsf_par_id>10678459</dc:nsf_par_id><dc:journal_name>The Astrophysical Journal</dc:journal_name><dc:journal_volume>988</dc:journal_volume><dc:journal_issue>1</dc:journal_issue><dc:page_range_or_elocation>69</dc:page_range_or_elocation><dc:issn>0004-637X</dc:issn><dc:isbn/><dc:doi>https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ade0bc</dc:doi><dcq:identifierAwardId>2407521</dcq:identifierAwardId><dc:subject/><dc:version_number/><dc:location/><dc:rights/><dc:institution/><dc:sponsoring_org>National Science Foundation</dc:sponsoring_org></record></records></rdf:RDF>