skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Abdelnaby, Mohamed"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Abstract Principal Component Analysis (PCA) has long been a cornerstone in dimensionality reduction for high-dimensional data, including single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). However, PCA’s performance typically degrades with increasing data size, can be sensitive to outliers, and assumes linearity. Recently, Random Projection (RP) methods have emerged as promising alternatives, addressing some of these limitations. This study systematically and comprehensively evaluates PCA and RP approaches, including Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) and randomized SVD, alongside Sparse and Gaussian Random Projection algorithms, with a focus on computational efficiency and downstream analysis effectiveness. We benchmark performance using multiple scRNA-seq datasets including labeled and unlabeled publicly available datasets. We apply Hierarchical Clustering and Spherical K-Means clustering algorithms to assess downstream clustering quality. For labeled datasets, clustering accuracy is measured using the Hungarian algorithm and Mutual Information. For unlabeled datasets, the Dunn Index and Gap Statistic capture cluster separation. Across both dataset types, the Within-Cluster Sum of Squares (WCSS) metric is used to assess variability. Additionally, locality preservation is examined, with RP outperforming PCA in several of the evaluated metrics. Our results demonstrate that RP not only surpasses PCA in computational speed but also rivals and, in some cases, exceeds PCA in preserving data variability and clustering quality. By providing a thorough benchmarking of PCA and RP methods, this work offers valuable insights into selecting optimal dimensionality reduction techniques, balancing computational performance, scalability, and the quality of downstream analyses. 
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available February 8, 2026