Search for: All records

We examine the collective behavior of single cells in microbial systems to provide insights into the origin of the biological clock. Microfluidics has opened a window onto how single cells can synchronize their behavior. Four hypotheses are proposed to explain the origin of the clock from the synchronized behavior of single cells. These hypotheses depend on the presence or absence of a communication mechanism between the clocks in single cells and the presence or absence of a stochastic component in the clock mechanism. To test these models, we integrate physical models for the behavior of the clocks in single cells or filaments with new approaches to measuring clocks in single cells. As an example, we provide evidence for a quorum-sensing signal both with microfluidics experiments on single cells and with continuousin vivometabolism NMR (CIVM-NMR). We also provide evidence for the stochastic component in clocks of single cells. Throughout this study, ensemble methods from statistical physics are used to characterize the clock at both the single-cell level and the macroscopic scale of 10⁶cells. 

Abstract We determined the macroscopic limit for phase synchronization of cellular clocks in an artificial tissue created by a “big chamber” microfluidic device to be about 150,000 cells or less. The dimensions of the microfluidic chamber allowed us to calculate an upper limit on the radius of a hypothesized quorum sensing signal molecule of 13.05 nm using a diffusion approximation for signal travel within the device. The use of a second microwell microfluidic device allowed the refinement of the macroscopic limit to a cell density of 2166 cells per fixed area of the device for phase synchronization. The measurement of averages over single cell trajectories in the microwell device supported a deterministic quorum sensing model identified by ensemble methods for clock phase synchronization. A strong inference framework was used to test the communication mechanism in phase synchronization of quorum sensing versus cell-to-cell contact, suggesting support for quorum sensing. Further evidence came from showing phase synchronization was density-dependent.