Search for: All records

Non-volatile memory (NVM) is poised to augment or replace DRAM as main memory. With the right abstraction and support, non-volatile main memory (NVMM) can provide an alternative to the storage system to host long-lasting persistent data. However, keeping persistent data in memory requires programs to be written such that data is crash consistent (i.e. it can be recovered after failure). Critical to supporting crash recovery is the guarantee of ordering of when stores become durable with respect to program order. Strict persistency, which requires persist order to coincide with program order of stores, is simple and intuitive but generally thought to be too slow. More relaxed persistency models are available but demand higher programming complexity, e.g. they require the programmer to insert persist barriers correctly in their program. We identify the source of strict persistency inefficiency as the gap between the point of visibility (PoV) which is the cache, and the point of persistency (PoP) which is the memory. In this paper, we propose a new approach to close the PoV/PoP gap which we refer to as Battery-Backed Buffer (BBB). The key idea of BBB is to provide a battery-backed persist buffer (bbPB) in each core next to the L1 data cache (L1D). A store value is allocated in the bbPB as it is written to cache, becoming part of the persistence domain. If a crash occurs, battery ensures bbPB can be fully drained to NVMM. BBB simplifies persistent programming as the programmer does not need to insert persist barriers or flushes. Furthermore, our BBB design achieves nearly identical results to eADR in terms of performance and number of NVMM writes, while requiring two orders of magnitude smaller energy and time to drain. 

Future systems are expected to increasingly include a Non-Volatile Main Memory (NVMM). However, due to the limited NVMM write endurance, the number of writes must be reduced. While new architectures and algorithms have been proposed to reduce writes to NVMM, few or no studies have looked at the effect of compiler optimizations on writes.In this paper, we investigate the impact of one popular compiler optimization (loop tiling) on a very important computation kernel (matrix multiplication). Our novel observation includes that tiling on matrix multiplication causes a 25× write amplification. Furthermore, we investigate techniques to make tilling more NVMM friendly, through choosing the right tile size and employing hierarchical tiling. Our method Write-Efficient Tiling (WET) adds a new outer tile designed for fitting the write working set to the Last Level Cache (LLC) to reduce the number of writes to NVMM. Our experiments reduce writes by 81% while simultaneously improve performance. 

Emerging Non-Volatile Memories (NVMs) are expected to be included in future main memory, providing the opportunity to host important data persistently in main memory. However, achieving persistency requires that programs be written with failure-safety in mind. Many persistency models and techniques have been proposed to help the programmer reason about failure-safety. They require that the programmer eagerly flush data out of caches to make it persistent. Eager persistency comes with a large overhead because it adds many instructions to the program for flushing cache lines and incurs costly stalls at barriers to wait for data to become durable. To reduce these overheads, we propose Lazy Persistency (LP), a software persistency technique that allows caches to slowly send dirty blocks to the NVMM through natural evictions. With LP, there are no additional writes to NVMM, no decrease in write endurance, and no performance degradation from cache line flushes and barriers. Persistency failures are discovered using software error detection (checksum), and the system recovers from them by recomputing inconsistent results. We describe the properties and design of LP and demonstrate how it can be applied to loop-based kernels popularly used in scientific computing. We evaluate LP and compare it to the state-of-the-art Eager Persistency technique from prior work. Compared to it, LP reduces the execution time and write amplification overheads from 9% and 21% to only 1% and 3%, respectively.