skip to main content


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Altschuler, Jason M."

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Abstract

    Multimarginal Optimal Transport (MOT) has attracted significant interest due to applications in machine learning, statistics, and the sciences. However, in most applications, the success of MOT is severely limited by a lack of efficient algorithms. Indeed, MOT in general requires exponential time in the number of marginalskand their support sizesn. This paper develops a general theory about what “structure” makes MOT solvable in$$\mathrm {poly}(n,k)$$poly(n,k)time. We develop a unified algorithmic framework for solving MOT in$$\mathrm {poly}(n,k)$$poly(n,k)time by characterizing the structure that different algorithms require in terms of simple variants of the dual feasibility oracle. This framework has several benefits. First, it enables us to show that the Sinkhorn algorithm, which is currently the most popular MOT algorithm, requires strictly more structure than other algorithms do to solve MOT in$$\mathrm {poly}(n,k)$$poly(n,k)time. Second, our framework makes it much simpler to develop$$\mathrm {poly}(n,k)$$poly(n,k)time algorithms for a given MOT problem. In particular, it is necessary and sufficient to (approximately) solve the dual feasibility oracle—which is much more amenable to standard algorithmic techniques. We illustrate this ease-of-use by developing$$\mathrm {poly}(n,k)$$poly(n,k)-time algorithms for three general classes of MOT cost structures: (1) graphical structure; (2) set-optimization structure; and (3) low-rank plus sparse structure. For structure (1), we recover the known result that Sinkhorn has$$\mathrm {poly}(n,k)$$poly(n,k)runtime; moreover, we provide the first$$\mathrm {poly}(n,k)$$poly(n,k)time algorithms for computing solutions that are exact and sparse. For structures (2)-(3), we give the first$$\mathrm {poly}(n,k)$$poly(n,k)time algorithms, even for approximate computation. Together, these three structures encompass many—if not most—current applications of MOT.

     
    more » « less