skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Beraldo_e_Silva, Leandro"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Abstract The LMC’s stellar bar is offset from the outer disk center, tilted from the disk plane, and does not drive gas inflows. These properties are atypical of bars in gas-rich galaxies, yet the LMC bar’s strength and radius are similar to typical barred galaxies. UsingN-body hydrodynamic simulations, we show that the LMC’s unusual bar is explainable if there was a recent collision (impact parameter ≈2 kpc) between the LMC and SMC. Pre-collision, the simulated bar is centered and coplanar. Post-collision, the simulated bar is offset (≈1.5 kpc) and tilted (≈8 . ° 6). The simulated bar offset reduces with time, and comparing with the observed offset (≈0.8 kpc) suggests the timing of the true collision to be 150–200 Myr ago. Then, 150 Myr post-collision, the LMC’s bar is centered with its dark matter (DM) halo, whereas the outer disk center is separated from the DM center by ≈1 kpc. The SMC collision produces a tilted-ring structure for the simulated LMC, consistent with observations. Post-collision, the simulated LMC bar’s pattern speed decreases by a factor of 2. We also provide a generalizable framework to quantitatively compare the LMC’s central gas distribution in different LMC–SMC interaction scenarios. We demonstrate that the SMC’s torques on the LMC’s bar during the collision are sufficient to explain the observed bar tilt, provided the SMC’s total mass within 2 kpc was (0.8–2.4) × 109M. Therefore, the LMC bar’s tilt constrains the SMC’s pre-collision DM profile, and requires the SMC to be a DM-dominated galaxy. 
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available July 15, 2026
  2. Abstract Barred galaxies exhibit boxy/peanut or X-shapes (BP/X) protruding from their disks in edge-on views. Two types of BP/X morphologies exist depending on whether the X-wings meet at the center (CX) or are off-centered (OX). Orbital studies indicate that various orbital types can generate X-shaped structures. Here we provide a classification approach that identifies the specific orbit families responsible for generating OX- and CX-shaped structures. Applying this approach to three differentN-body bar models, we show that both OX and CX structures are associated with thex1 orbit family, but OX-supporting orbits possess higher angular momentum (closer tox1 orbits) than orbits in CX structures. Consequently, as the bar slows down, the contribution of higher angular momentum OX-supporting orbits decreases and that of lower angular momentum orbits increases, resulting in an evolution of the morphology from OX to CX. If the bar does not slow down, the shape of the BP/X structure and the fractions of OX/CX-supporting orbits remain substantially unchanged. Bars that do not undergo buckling but that do slow down initially show the OX structure and are dominated by high angular momentum orbits, transitioning to a CX morphology. Bars that buckle exhibit a combination of both OX- and CX-supporting orbits immediately after the buckling but become more CX dominated as their pattern speed decreases. This study demonstrates that the evolution of BP/X morphology and orbit populations strongly depends on the evolution of the bar angular momentum. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract UsingN-body simulations, we explore the effects of growing a supermassive black hole (SMBH) prior to or during the formation of a stellar bar. Keeping the final mass and growth rate of the SMBH fixed, we show that if it is introduced before or while the bar is still growing, the SMBH does not cause a decrease in bar amplitude. Rather, in most cases, it is strengthened. In addition, an early-growing SMBH always either decreases the buckling amplitude, delays buckling, or both. This weakening of buckling is caused by an increase in the disk vertical velocity dispersion at radii well beyond the nominal black hole sphere of influence. While we find considerable stochasticity and sensitivity to initial conditions, the only case where the SMBH causes a decrease in bar amplitude is when it is introduced after the bar has attained a steady state. In this case, we confirm previous findings that the decrease in bar strength is a result of scattering of bar-supporting orbits with small pericenter radii. By heating the inner disk both radially and vertically, an early-growing SMBH increases the fraction of stars that can be captured by the inner Lindblad resonance (ILR) and the vertical ILR, thereby strengthening both the bar and the boxy-peanut-shaped bulge. Using orbital frequency analysis of star particles, we show that when an SMBH is introduced early and the bar forms around it, the bar is populated by different families of regular bar-supporting orbits than when the bar forms without an SMBH. 
    more » « less