Search for: All records

Abstract Invasive wildflowers pose a conservation paradox: While they often reduce the diversity and abundance of native wildflowers, they can provide resources for native pollinators, including imperiled species. Previous work has framed wildflower invasions as outcomes of global change, but less is known about how interacting anthropogenic drivers influence both invasion and pollination. In particular, it remains unclear whether exotic wildflowers compensate for native floral losses under ongoing environmental change. To address this, we tested whether exotic wildflowers provide resources for native pollinators under two drivers of wildflower decline: eutrophication and defaunation. Using a factorial global change experiment at three sites in the highly invaded California floristic region, we tested whether increases in exotic wildflowers (1) sustain pollinator visitation and richness, (2) maintain pollinator composition and function, and (3) facilitate co‐invasion by exotic pollinators. We found that eutrophication promoted exotic asters, which served as visually prominent, attractive hubs in plant–pollinator networks. These asters attracted both generalist and specialist native pollinators but also increased visitation by exotic pollinators, raising the risk of invasional meltdown. Our results suggest that exotic wildflowers can buffer pollinator communities against anthropogenic change but may do so while shifting pollinator composition toward non‐native species. 

Abstract Plants use chemicals to respond to their environments. Despite the impact of competition on plant productivity, few studies consider how plant–plant competition affects phytochemistry; most phytochemistry studies focus on plant–consumer interactions. It therefore remains unclear how plants chemically respond to changes in both competition and consumer pressure. We used 1H-NMR spectroscopy to characterize the phytochemistry (both primary and secondary metabolites) of a C4 grass (Andropogon gerardi) and a legume (Lespedeza capitata) in a field experiment. Both species were grown with intraspecific or interspecific neighbours (monoculture or 16-species polyculture) with or without a combined fungicide + insecticide treatment (consumers reduced vs. consumers present) in a factorial design. We measured species aboveground biomass, healthy plant cover (NDVI) and phytochemistry in the four treatments to determine whether plants alter their biomass, phytochemistry, or both in response to neighbours and herbivory. Phytochemistry of A. gerardi did not vary with neighbour identity or consumers, in contrast to A. gerardi biomass, which was higher under interspecific competition and when consumers were reduced. Phytochemistry of L. capitata was also unrelated to consumer reduction, though L. capitata had higher NDVI under reduced consumers. However, L. capitata had lower biomass and exhibited phytochemical signs of metabolic stress (lower sugars and higher amino acid production) when grown with interspecific neighbours. Theory and empirical work have focused on coevolution with consumers as driving phytochemical variation, but our results suggest that—at community scales—the competitive environment may be more important than consumer pressure in determining short-term phytochemical responses of some species. 

Abstract Anthropogenic activities add more reactive nitrogen (N) to the environment than all natural sources combined, and the fate of this N is of environmental concern. If N that is deposited on terrestrial ecosystems through atmospheric deposition is retained in plant tissues or soil organic matter, it could stimulate carbon (C) storage in plant biomass or soils. However, added N also could increase soil inorganic N concentrations and leaching, potentially polluting watersheds, particularly in areas with low-N soils and/or a high propensity for leaching, such as sandy or arid areas. Here, we assessed N allocation and retention across a 13-year experimental N addition gradient in a temperate grassland. We found that N accumulation decreased significantly at mid- to high levels of N addition compared to the Control, such that ecosystem N pools were equivalent across a 10 g m⁻² year⁻¹range of annual N addition rates (0–10 g N m⁻² year⁻¹), which spans most of the global range of N deposition. Nitrogen addition increased plant tissue percent N, but the total pool of N did not increase because of reduced plant biomass, particularly in roots. Nitrogen addition also increased soil inorganic N concentrations. Our results indicate that N addition is unlikely to increase grassland N pools, particularly in sandy or low-fertility ecosystems with a high potential for leaching because high application rates lead to N saturation, and additional inputs are lost. 

Distributed experimental networks have emerged as a powerful approach in field ecology, enabling experimental replication across global gradients. These networks use standardized treatments at dispersed sites to identify factors like climate or soil that shape biotic responses. Reserving space for future “add‐on” work fosters discovery by transforming distributed networks into distributed experimental infrastructure. However, challenges include balancing feasibility, plot impacts, and demands on site scientists. Using the Disturbance and Recovery Across Grasslands Network (DRAGNet) as a case study informed by lessons learned in the Nutrient Network (NutNet), we outline effective practices for designing add‐on work to retain the original experiment’s integrity while effectively using the resources of the network participants. By following guidelines for hypothesis‐driven, inclusive research that engages contributors intellectually, minimizes plot impacts using field‐tested protocols, and maximizes scientific impact and inclusion, distributed networks can become valuable infrastructure for advancing ecological understanding. 

Abstract Global interest and investment in nature‐based solutions (NbS) are rapidly increasing because of the potential of this approach to concurrently counter biodiversity loss, provide cost‐effective measures for climate change adaptations, and maintain natural processes that underpin human health and wellbeing.Recognition is growing that grasslands in many regions will protect carbon stores more effectively than forests in the warmer, drier, more fire‐prone conditions of the future while also serving as hotspots for biodiversity. Yet grasslands have received less attention for their NbS potential. Despite the wide‐ranging goals of this approach, many investments in nature‐based solutions also have focused narrowly on using plants to meet climate pledges, often without considering plant interactions with herbivores and the abiotic environment that jointly control ecosystem functioning and underpin the success of nature‐based solutions.Here, we review the roles that large and small vertebrate and invertebrate herbivores play in the ability of the world's grasslands to provide nature‐based solutions, with a focus on wild herbivore impacts on biodiversity and carbon storage.Synthesis. Planning for nature‐based solutions with a holistic, ecologically informed view that includes the role of herbivores and their interaction with plants and the environment will allow NbS investments to more likely achieve successful, sustainable outcomes. 

Abstract Plant disease often increases with N, decreases with CO₂, and increases as biodiversity is lost (i.e., the dilution effect). Additionally, all these factors can indirectly alter disease by changing host biomass and hence density-dependent disease transmission. Yet over long periods of time as communities undergo compositional changes, these biomass-mediated pathways might fade, intensify, or even reverse in direction. Using a field experiment that has manipulated N, CO₂, and species richness for over 20 years, we compared severity of a specialist rust fungus (Puccinia andropogonis) on its grass host (Andropogon gerardii) shortly after the experiment began (1999) and twenty years later (2019). Between these two sampling periods, two decades apart, we found that disease severity consistently increased with N and decreased with CO₂. However, the relationship between diversity and disease reversed from a dilution effect in 1999 (more severe disease in monocultures) to an amplification effect in 2019 (more severe disease in mixtures). The best explanation for this reversal centered on host density (i.e., aboveground biomass), which was initially highest in monoculture, but became highest in mixtures two decades later. Thus, the diversity-disease pattern reversed, but disease consistently increased with host biomass. These results highlight the consistency of N and CO₂as drivers of plant disease in the Anthropocene and emphasize the critical role of host biomass—despite potentially variable effects of diversity—for relationships between biodiversity and disease.