Search for: All records

This research employs pepsin-containing membranes to digest proteins online after a capillary electrophoresis (CE) separation and prior to tandem mass spectrometry. Proteolysis after the separation allows the peptides from a given protein to enter the mass spectrometer in a single plug. Thus, migration time can serve as an additional criterion for confirming the identification of a peptide. The membrane resides in a sheath-flow electrospray ionization (ESI) source to enable digestion immediately before spray into the mass spectrometer, thus limiting separation of the digested peptides. Using the same membrane, digestion occurred reproducibly during 20 consecutive CE analyses performed over a 10 h period. Additionally, after separating a mixture of six unreduced proteins with CE, online digestion facilitated protein identification with at least 2 identifiable peptides for all the proteins. Sequence coverages were >75% for myoglobin and carbonic anhydrase II but much lower for proteins containing disulfide bonds. Development of methods for efficient separation of reduced proteins or identification of cross-linked peptides should enhance sequence coverages for proteins with disulfide bonds. Migration times for the peptides identified from a specific protein differed by <∼30 s, which allows for rejection of some spurious peptide identifications. 

Nanopores in thin membranes play important roles in science and industry. Single nanopores have provided a step-change in portable DNA sequencing and understanding nanoscale transport while multipore membranes facilitate food processing and purification of water and medicine. Despite the unifying use of nanopores, the fields of single nanopores and multipore membranes differ – to varying degrees – in terms of materials, fabrication, analysis, and applications. Such a partial disconnect hinders scientific progress as important challenges are best resolved together. This Viewpoint suggests how synergistic crosstalk between the two fields can provide considerable mutual benefits in fundamental understanding and the development of advanced membranes. We first describe the main differences including the atomistic definition of single pores compared to the less defined conduits in multipore membranes. We then outline steps to improve communication between the two fields such as harmonizing measurements and modelling of transport and selectivity. The resulting insight is expected to improve the rational design of porous membranes. The Viewpoint concludes with an outlook of other developments that can be best achieved by collaboration across the two fields to advance the understanding of transport in nanopores and create next-generation porous membranes tailored for sensing, filtration, and other applications.