Nutrition-dependent growth of sexual traits is a major contributor to phenotypic diversity, and a large body of research documents insulin signalling as a major regulator of nutritional plasticity. However, findings across studies raise the possibility that the role of individual components within the insulin signalling pathway diverges in function among traits and taxa. Here, we use RNAi-mediated transcript depletion in the gazelle dung beetle to investigate the functions of forkhead box O (Foxo) and two paralogs of the insulin receptor (InR1 and InR2) in shaping nutritional plasticity in polyphenic male head horns, exaggerated fore legs, and weakly nutrition-responsive genitalia. Our functional genetic manipulations led to three main findings: FoxoRNAi reduced the length of exaggerated head horns in large males, while neither InR1 nor InR2 knock-downs resulted in measurable horn phenotypes. These results are similar to those documented previously for another dung beetle (Onthophagus taurus), but in stark contrast to findings in rhinoceros beetles. Secondly, knockdown of Foxo, InR1, and InR2 led to an increase in the intercept or slope of the scaling relationship of genitalia size. These findings are in contrast even to results documented previously for O. taurus. Lastly, while FoxoRNAi reduces male forelegs in D. gazella and O. taurus, the effects of InR1 and InR2 knockdowns diverged across dung beetle species. Our results add to the growing body of literature indicating that despite insulin signalling's conserved role as a regulator of nutritional plasticity, the functions of its components may diversify among traits and species, potentially fuelling the evolution of scaling relationships.
Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Abstract -
Polyphenism is a type of developmental plasticity that translates continuous environmental variability into discontinuous phenotypes. Such discontinuity likely requires a switch between alternative gene-regulatory networks, a principle that has been borne out by mechanisms found to promote morph-specific gene expression. However, whether robustness is required to execute a polyphenism decision has awaited testing at the molecular level. Here, we used a nematode model for polyphenism,more » « less
Pristionchus pacificus , to identify the molecular regulatory factors that ensure the development of alternative forms. This species has a dimorphism in its adult feeding structures, specifically teeth, which are a morphological novelty that allows predation on other nematodes. Through a forward genetic screen, we determined that a duplicate homolog of the Mediator subunit MDT-15/MED15,P. pacificus MDT-15.1, is necessary for the polyphenism and the robustness of the resulting phenotypes. This transcriptional coregulator, which has a conserved role in metabolic responses to nutritional stress, coordinates these processes with its effects on this diet-induced polyphenism. Moreover, this MED15 homolog genetically interacts with two nuclear receptors, NHR-1 and NHR-40, to achieve dimorphism: Single and double mutants for these three factors result in morphologies that together produce a continuum of forms between the extremes of the polyphenism. In summary, we have identified a molecular regulator that confers discontinuity to a morphological polyphenism, while also identifying a role for MED15 as a plasticity effector. -
Ruvinsky, Ilya (Ed.)Abstract Developmental polyphenism, the ability to switch between phenotypes in response to environmental variation, involves the alternating activation of environmentally sensitive genes. Consequently, to understand how a polyphenic response evolves requires a comparative analysis of the components that make up environmentally sensitive networks. Here, we inferred coexpression networks for a morphological polyphenism, the feeding-structure dimorphism of the nematode Pristionchus pacificus. In this species, individuals produce alternative forms of a novel trait—moveable teeth, which in one morph enable predatory feeding—in response to environmental cues. To identify the origins of polyphenism network components, we independently inferred coexpression modules for more conserved transcriptional responses, including in an ancestrally nonpolyphenic nematode species. Further, through genome-wide analyses of these components across the nematode family (Diplogastridae) in which the polyphenism arose, we reconstructed how network components have changed. To achieve this, we assembled and resolved the phylogenetic context for five genomes of species representing the breadth of Diplogastridae and a hypothesized outgroup. We found that gene networks instructing alternative forms arose from ancestral plastic responses to environment, specifically starvation-induced metabolism and the formation of a conserved diapause (dauer) stage. Moreover, loci from rapidly evolving gene families were integrated into these networks with higher connectivity than throughout the rest of the P. pacificus transcriptome. In summary, we show that the modular regulatory outputs of a polyphenic response evolved through the integration of conserved plastic responses into networks with genes of high evolutionary turnover.more » « less
-
Evolution of, and via, Developmental Plasticity: Insights through the Study of Scaling Relationships
Abstract Scaling relationships emerge from differential growth of body parts relative to each other. As such, scaling relationships are at least in part the product of developmental plasticity. While some of the developmental genetic mechanisms underlying scaling relationships are starting to be elucidated, how these mechanisms evolve and give rise to the enormous diversity of allometric scaling observed in nature is less understood. Furthermore, developmental plasticity has itself been proposed as a mechanism that facilitates adaptation and diversification, yet its role in the developmental evolution of scaling relationships remains largely unknown. In this review, we first explore how the mechanisms of scaling relationships have evolved. We primarily focus on insect development and review how pathway components and pathway interactions have evolved across taxa to regulate scaling relationships across diverse traits. We then discuss the potential role of developmental plasticity in the evolution of scaling relationships. Specifically, we address the potential role of allometric plasticity and cryptic genetic variation in allometry in facilitating divergence via genetic accommodation. Collectively, in this article, we aim to bring together two aspects of developmental plasticity: the mechanistic underpinnings of scaling relationships and their evolution, and the potential role that plasticity plays in the evolutionary diversification of scaling relationships.
-
Abstract Developmental processes transduce diverse influences during phenotype formation, thereby biasing and structuring amount and type of phenotypic variation available for evolutionary processes to act on. The causes, extent, and consequences of this bias are subject to significant debate. Here we explore the role of developmental bias in contributing to organisms’ ability to innovate, to adapt to novel or stressful conditions, and to generate well integrated, resilient phenotypes in the face of perturbations. We focus our inquiry on one taxon, the horned dung beetle genus
Onthophagus , and review the role developmental bias might play across several levels of biological organization: (a) gene regulatory networks that pattern specific body regions; (b) plastic developmental mechanisms that coordinate body wide responses to changing environments and; (c) developmental symbioses and niche construction that enable organisms to build teams and to actively modify their own selective environments. We posit that across all these levels developmental bias shapes the way living systems innovate, adapt, and withstand stress, in ways that can alternately limit, bias, or facilitate developmental evolution. We conclude that the structuring contribution of developmental bias in evolution deserves further study to better understand why and how developmental evolution unfolds the way it does.