skip to main content

Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Casstevens, Terry M."

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. null (Ed.)
    Summary The need for efficient tools and applications for analyzing genomic diversity is essential for any genetics research program. One such tool, TASSEL (Trait Analysis by aSSociation, Evolution and Linkage), provides many core methods for genomic analyses. Despite its efficiency, TASSEL has limited means to use scripting languages for reproducible research and interacting with other analytical tools. Here we present an R package rTASSEL, a front-end to connect to a variety of highly used TASSEL methods and analytical tools. The goal of this package is to create a unified scripting workflow that exploits the analytical prowess of TASSEL in conjunction with R’s popular data handling and parsing capabilities without ever having the user to switch between these two environments. By implementing this workflow, we can achieve performances ranging from approximately 2 to 20 times faster than other widely used R packages for various functionalities. Availability and implementation rTASSEL is implemented in R using core TASSEL methods written in Java. The source code for rTASSEL can be found at The source code for TASSEL can be found at 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract

    The ability to accurately quantify the simultaneous effect of multiple genomic loci on multiple traits is now possible due to current and emerging high‐throughput genotyping and phenotyping technologies. To date, most efforts to quantify these genotype‐to‐phenotype relationships have focused on either multi‐trait models that test a single marker at a time or multi‐locus models that quantify associations with a single trait. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the performance of a multi‐trait, multi‐locus stepwise (MSTEP) model selection procedure we developed to (a) a commonly used multi‐trait single‐locus model and (b) a univariate multi‐locus model. We used real marker data in maize (Zea maysL.) and soybean (Glycine maxL.) to simulate multiple traits controlled by various combinations of pleiotropic and nonpleiotropic quantitative trait nucleotides (QTNs). In general, we found that both multi‐trait models outperformed the univariate multi‐locus model, especially when analyzing a trait of low heritability. For traits controlled by either a combination of pleiotropic and nonpleiotropic QTNs or a large number of QTNs (i.e., 50), our MSTEP model often outperformed at least one of the two alternative models. When applied to the analysis of two tocochromanol‐related traits in maize grain, MSTEP identified the same peak‐associated marker that has been reported in a previous study. We therefore conclude that MSTEP is a useful addition to the suite of statistical models that are commonly used to gain insight into the genetic architecture of agronomically important traits.

    more » « less